Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Jacob v. Playa El Agua Development Limited
    Partnership, 2015 ONCA 372

DATE: 20150525

DOCKET: C59761

MacPherson, Cronk and Gillese JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Jose-Bernard Jacob

Plaintiff (Appellant)

and

Playa El Agua
    Development Limited Partnership, Playa El Agua Development General Partner
    Ltd.,
Morris, Rose, Ledgett, The Estate of John Church
,
    Torcat, Michael Paterson,
Harvey Wortsman, Hwa Lee
,
    Dennis Derry, and Seaviewdevelopments de Venezuela C.A.

Defendants(Respondents)

Robert A. Maxwell, for the appellant

Jack B. Berkow and Ranjan Das, for the respondents
    Morris, Rose Ledgett and Harvey Wortsman

David A. Brooker, for the respondents the Estate of John
    Church and Hwa Lee

Heard and released orally: May 21, 2015

On appeal from the Order of Justice Darla A. Wilson of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated November 19, 2014.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The appellant Jose-Bernard Jacob appeals the Order of D. Wilson J. of
    the Superior Court of Justice dated November 19, 2014 dismissing this action
    against these four defendants.

[2]

The action, which relates to a property transaction in Venezuela, was
    commenced by the appellant in 1998. By the autumn of 2014, it had still not
    come to trial. There is a long list of steps, missteps, inactivity and silence
    during the 16-year life of the action. All of it was documented in the
    well-organized and comprehensive reasons of the mo

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Jacob v. Playa El Agua Development Limited
    Partnership, 2015 ONCA 372

DATE: 20150525

DOCKET: C59761

MacPherson, Cronk and Gillese JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Jose-Bernard Jacob

Plaintiff (Appellant)

and

Playa El Agua
    Development Limited Partnership, Playa El Agua Development General Partner
    Ltd.,
Morris, Rose, Ledgett, The Estate of John Church
,
    Torcat, Michael Paterson,
Harvey Wortsman, Hwa Lee
,
    Dennis Derry, and Seaviewdevelopments de Venezuela C.A.

Defendants(Respondents)

Robert A. Maxwell, for the appellant

Jack B. Berkow and Ranjan Das, for the respondents
    Morris, Rose Ledgett and Harvey Wortsman

David A. Brooker, for the respondents the Estate of John
    Church and Hwa Lee

Heard and released orally: May 21, 2015

On appeal from the Order of Justice Darla A. Wilson of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated November 19, 2014.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The appellant Jose-Bernard Jacob appeals the Order of D. Wilson J. of
    the Superior Court of Justice dated November 19, 2014 dismissing this action
    against these four defendants.

[2]

The action, which relates to a property transaction in Venezuela, was
    commenced by the appellant in 1998. By the autumn of 2014, it had still not
    come to trial. There is a long list of steps, missteps, inactivity and silence
    during the 16-year life of the action. All of it was documented in the
    well-organized and comprehensive reasons of the motion judge. The overwhelming
    majority of the missteps, inactivity and silence clearly rest at the feet of
    the appellant, as the motion judge found.

[3]

The well-established test is that an action should not be dismissed for
    delay unless: (1) the delay is intentional and contumelious; or (2) there is an
    inordinate, inexcusable delay, for which the plaintiff or his lawyer is
    responsible, which gives rise to a substantial risk that a fair trial might not
    now be possible: see
Langenecker v. Sauvé
, 2011 ONCA 803, a


Prompt:
Clause text:
In case anyone or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall, for any reason, be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions of this Agreement, but this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or other unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. If, moreover, anyone or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be excessively broad as to duration, geographical scope or subject, it shall be construed by limiting it and reducing it so as to be enforceable to the extent compatible with applicable law as it shall then appear.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Severability


Prompt:
Can you create a function in Javascript that returns a string of the current date in this format?
"February 6, 2023"

Response:
Yes, here is a function in JavaScript that returns the current date in the specified format:

function currentDate() {
  const today = new Date();
  const monthNames = ["January", "February", "March", "April", "May", "June",
    "July", "August", "September", "October", "November", "December"
  ];
  const day = today.getDate();
  const monthIndex = today.getMonth();
  const year = today.getFullYear();

  return `${monthNames[monthIndex]} ${day}, ${year}`;
}


Prompt:
Clause text:
The parties shall each bear their own respective expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the contemplated Transaction.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Expenses


Prompt: What is the first paragraph of Constitution of The Republic of Latvia?

Response:
The first paragraph of the Constitution of The Republic of Latvia is from 1922:
```
PREAMBLE
The people of Latvia, in freely elected Constitutional Assembly, have adopted the following State Constitution:

The State of Latvia, proclaimed on 18 November 1918, has been established by uniting historical Latvian lands and on the basis of the unwavering will of the Latvian nation to have its own State and its inalienable right of self-determination in order to guarantee the existence and development of the Latvian nation, its language and culture throughout the centuries, to ensure freedom and promote welfare of the people of Latvia and each individual.
```
Any further questions about Latvia?


Prompt: ¿Consideras a HTML un lenguaje de programación?

Response:
No, HTML (HyperText Markup Language) no se considera un lenguaje de programación en el sentido estricto de la palabra. Aunque se utiliza en conjunto con otros lenguajes, como CSS y JavaScript, para crear sitios web interactivos y dinámicos.
Un lenguaje de programación es un lenguaje diseñado para comunicar instrucciones a una máquina, con el fin de realizar una tarea específica incluyendo elementos como variables, operadores, estructuras de control de flujo, funciones, y otros constructos que permiten al programador expresar algoritmos y soluciones a problemas en términos de un conjunto de instrucciones que una máquina puede entender. HTML, por otro lado, es un lenguaje de marcado utilizado para estructurar y presentar contenido web. HTML no tiene elementos de programación.


Prompt: ¿Me puedes generar un listado con los presidentes de Chile?

Response:
Claro! Aquí te dejo un listado con los presidentes de Chile desde su independencia en 1810 hasta la actualidad:

1810-1811: Mateo de Toro y Zambrano
1811-1811: Juan Martínez de Rozas
1811-1812: Fernando Márquez de la Plata
1812-1813: José Miguel Carrera
1813-1813: Francisco de la Lastra
1813-1814: José Miguel Carrera
1814-1814: Francisco de la Lastra
1814-1817: Mariano Osorio
1817-1823: Bernardo O'Higgins
1823-1823: Agustín Eyzaguirre
1823-1826: Ramón Freire
1826-1827: Manuel Blanco Encalada
1827-1829: Agustín Eyzaguirre
1829-1830: Ramón Freire
1830-1831: Francisco Ruiz-Tagle
1831-1831: José Tomás Ovalle
1831-1841: Joaquín Prieto
1841-1841: Agustín Eyzaguirre
1841-1846: Manuel Bulnes
1846-1851: Manuel Montt
1851-1861: José Joaquín Pérez
1861-1871: Federico Errázuriz Zañartu
1871-1876: Aníbal Pinto
1876-1881: Domingo Santa María
1881-1886: Domingo Santa María
1886-1891: José Manuel Balmaceda
1891-1891: Jorge Montt
1891-1896: Federico Errázuriz Echaurren
1896-1901: Federico Errázuriz Echaurren
1901-1906: Germán Riesco
1906-1910: Pedro Montt
1910-1915: Ramón Barros Luco
1915-1920: Juan Luis Sanfuentes
1920-1924: Arturo Alessandri
1924-1925: Luis Altamirano
1925-1927: Emiliano Figueroa
1927-1931: Carlos Ibáñez del Campo
1931-1932: Juan Esteban Montero
1932-1938: Arturo Alessandri
1938-1941: Pedro Aguirre Cerda
1941-1946: Juan Antonio Ríos
1946-1952: Gabriel González Videla
1952-1958: Carlos Ibáñez del Campo
1958-1964: Jorge Alessandri
1964-1970: Eduardo Frei Montalva
1970-1973: Salvador Allende
1973-1990: Augusto Pinochet (dictadura militar)
1990-1994: Patricio Aylwin
1994-2000: Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle
2000-2006: Ricardo Lagos
Michelle Bachelet (2006-2010, 2014-2018)
Sebastián Piñera (2010-2014, 2018-actualidad)


Prompt:
Clause text:
Interest shall be computed on the unpaid Principal Amount hereunder on the basis of a year composed of three hundred sixty-five (365) days, but shall accrue and be payable for the actual number of days during which the Principal Amount is outstanding and shall be compounded quarterly by capitalizing such interest quarterly. Accrued but unpaid interest shall be payable in accordance with Paragraph 1 .

What type of clause is this?

Response: Interests


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Bank shall employ Executive to serve as Executive Vice President & Chief Credit Officer of the Bank and Executive Vice President of Bancorp, a publicly traded corporation.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Positions


Prompt:
Clause text:
Upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth herein, a closing shall occur at the principal offices of the Company, or such other location as the parties shall mutually agree. At closing, Holder shall deliver certificates representing the Warrants to the Company and the Company shall deliver to such Holder a certificate representing the Exchange Shares, in the name(s) and amount(s) as requested by the Holder.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Closings


Prompt: Thanks

Response: You're welcome! If you have any more questions about the XML code or Gnome's design guidelines, feel free to ask.


Prompt:
Clause text:
All amounts owed under this Agreement shall be stated, calculated and paid in United States Dollars. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement, Intel shall pay the invoicing entity for the amounts due, owing, and duly invoiced under this Agreement within [***] ( [***] ) days following delivery of an invoice therefor to such place as the invoicing entity may reasonably direct therein.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Payments


Prompt:
Clause text:
In addition to being entitled to exercise all rights provided herein or granted by law, including recovery of damages, each of the Purchasers and the Company will be entitled to seek specific performance under the Transaction Documents.  The parties agree that monetary damages may not be adequate compensation for any loss incurred by reason of any breach of obligations described in the foregoing sentence and hereby agree to waive in any action for specific performance of any such obligation (other than in connection with any action for a temporary restraining order) the defense that a remedy at law would be adequate.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Remedies


Prompt:
Clause text:
Payments made under this Section 5 shall be subject to applicable federal, state and local taxes and withholdings.  If the payment of any COBRA or health insurance premiums would otherwise violate the nondiscrimination rules or cause the reimbursement of claims to be taxable under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Act”) or Section 105(h) of the Code, the Company paid premiums shall be treated as taxable payments and be subject to imputed income tax treatment to the extent necessary to eliminate any discriminatory treatment or taxation under the Act or Section 105(h) of the Code.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Withholdings


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

WARNING

The President of the panel hearing this appeal directs
    that the following should be attached to the file:

An order restricting publication in this proceeding
    under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2) of the
Criminal Code
shall continue.  These sections of
the Criminal Code
provide:

486.4     (1)
Subject to subsection (2), the presiding judge
    or justice may make an order directing that any information that could identify
    the complainant or a witness shall not be published in any document or broadcast
    or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in respect of

(a)     any of the following offences;

(i)   an offence under section 151, 152,
    153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 172, 172.1, 173, 210, 211,
    212, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.02, 279.03, 346 or 347,

(ii)  an offence under section 144
    (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female), 156
    (indecent assault on male) or 245 (common assault) or subsection 246(1)
    (assault with intent) of the
Criminal Code
, chapter C-34 of the Revised
    Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 4, 1983, or

(iii) an offence under subsection 146(1)
    (sexual intercourse with a female under 14) or (2) (sexual intercourse with a
    female between 14 and 16) or section 151 (seduction of a female between 16 and
    18), 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter), 155 (buggery or bestiality),
    157 (g

Response:
WARNING

The President of the panel hearing this appeal directs
    that the following should be attached to the file:

An order restricting publication in this proceeding
    under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2) of the
Criminal Code
shall continue.  These sections of
the Criminal Code
provide:

486.4     (1)
Subject to subsection (2), the presiding judge
    or justice may make an order directing that any information that could identify
    the complainant or a witness shall not be published in any document or broadcast
    or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in respect of

(a)     any of the following offences;

(i)   an offence under section 151, 152,
    153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 172, 172.1, 173, 210, 211,
    212, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.02, 279.03, 346 or 347,

(ii)  an offence under section 144
    (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female), 156
    (indecent assault on male) or 245 (common assault) or subsection 246(1)
    (assault with intent) of the
Criminal Code
, chapter C-34 of the Revised
    Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 4, 1983, or

(iii) an offence under subsection 146(1)
    (sexual intercourse with a female under 14) or (2) (sexual intercourse with a
    female between 14 and 16) or section 151 (seduction of a female between 16 and
    18), 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter), 155 (buggery or bestiality),
    157 (gross indecency), 166 (parent or guardian procuring defilement) or 167
    (householder permitting defilement) of the
Criminal Code
, chapter C-34
    of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January
    1, 1988; or

(b)     two or more
    offences being dealt with in the same proceeding, at least one of which is an
    offence referred to in any of subparagraphs (a)(i) to (iii).

(2)
In proceedings in respect of the offences referred
    to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b), the presiding judge or justice shall


Prompt: Parafrasea el texto presentado a continuacion para

Response: Ejem... Creo que necesito que proporciones el texto para que lo pueda parafrasear.


Prompt:
Clause text:
If Lender institutes any suit or action to enforce any of the terms of this Assignment, Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees at trial and upon any appeal.  Whether or not any court action is involved, and to the extent not prohibited by law, all reasonable expenses Lender incurs that in Lender's opinion are necessary at any time for the protection of its interest or the enforcement of its rights shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of the expenditure until repaid.  Expenses covered by this paragraph include, without limitation, however subject to any limits under applicable law, Lender's attorneys' fees and Lender's legal expenses, whether or not there is a lawsuit, including attorneys' fees and expenses for bankruptcy proceedings (including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or injunction), appeals, and any anticipated post-judgment collection services, the cost of searching records, obtaining title reports (including foreclosure reports), surveyors' reports, and appraisal fees, title insurance, and fees for the Trustee, to the extent permitted by applicable law.  Grantor also will pay any court costs, in addition to all other sums provided by law.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Expenses


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

WARNING

The President of the panel hearing this
    appeal directs that the following should be attached to the file:

An order restricting publication in this
    proceeding under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (2.1), (2.2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2)
    of the
Criminal Code
shall continue.  These sections of
the Criminal
    Code
provide:

486.4(1)       Subject to subsection
    (2), the presiding judge or justice may make an order directing that any
    information that could identify the victim or a witness shall not be published
    in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in
    respect of

(a)     any of the following offences;

(i)      an offence under section 151,
    152, 153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 171.1, 172, 172.1, 172.2,
    173, 210, 211, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.011, 279.02, 279.03, 280, 281,
    286.1, 286.2, 286.3, 346 or 347, or

(ii)      any offence under this Act, as
    it read at any time before the day on which this subparagraph comes into force,
    if the conduct alleged involves a violation of the complainants sexual
    integrity and that conduct would be an offence referred to in subparagraph (i)
    if it occurred on or after that day; or

(iii)     REPEALED: S.C. 2014, c. 25,
    s. 22(2), effective December 6, 2014 (Act, s. 49).

(b)     two or more
    offences being dealt with in the same proceeding, at least one of which is an
    offence referred to in paragraph (a

Response:
WARNING

The President of the panel hearing this
    appeal directs that the following should be attached to the file:

An order restricting publication in this
    proceeding under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (2.1), (2.2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2)
    of the
Criminal Code
shall continue.  These sections of
the Criminal
    Code
provide:

486.4(1)       Subject to subsection
    (2), the presiding judge or justice may make an order directing that any
    information that could identify the victim or a witness shall not be published
    in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in
    respect of

(a)     any of the following offences;

(i)      an offence under section 151,
    152, 153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 171.1, 172, 172.1, 172.2,
    173, 210, 211, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.011, 279.02, 279.03, 280, 281,
    286.1, 286.2, 286.3, 346 or 347, or

(ii)      any offence under this Act, as
    it read at any time before the day on which this subparagraph comes into force,
    if the conduct alleged involves a violation of the complainants sexual
    integrity and that conduct would be an offence referred to in subparagraph (i)
    if it occurred on or after that day; or

(iii)     REPEALED: S.C. 2014, c. 25,
    s. 22(2), effective December 6, 2014 (Act, s. 49).

(b)     two or more
    offences being dealt with in the same proceeding, at least one of which is an
    offence referred to in paragraph (a).

(2)     In proceedings in respect of the
    offences referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b), the presiding judge or justice
    shall

(a)     at the first reasonable
    opportunity, inform any witness under the age of eighteen years and the victim
    of the right to make an application for the order; and

(b)     on application made by the
    victim, the prosecutor or any such witness, make the order.

(2.1) Subject to subsection (2.2), in
    proceedings in respect of an offence other than an offence referred to in
    subsec


Prompt: Genera una posible conversación entre un vendedor de una tienda de sofás y un cliente que quiere comprar un sofá verde con asiento reclinable y sujetavasos.

Response:
Vendedor: ¡Hola! ¿En qué puedo ayudarle?

Cliente: Estoy buscando un sofá verde con asiento reclinable y sujeta vasos.

Vendedor: ¡Tenemos exactamente lo que estás buscando! ¿Tienes alguna idea de la medida que estás buscando?

Cliente: Estoy buscando algo grande para mi sala de estar, un sofá de tres plazas.

Vendedor: Tenemos varias opciones de sofás de tres plazas de color verde con asiento reclinable y sujeta vasos. Aquí hay una muestra que seguramente le encantará. ¿Qué le parece?

Cliente: Me gusta mucho. ¿Cuánto cuesta?

Vendedor: El precio regular es de $899.99, pero tenemos una oferta especial de hoy en día, así que estaría en $749.99. ¿Le interesa?


Prompt:
Clause text:
Except as limited by applicable Law and subject to the provisions of this Section 8.01 , the Managers of the Company, and the directors or managers of each Subsidiary thereof (each an “ Indemnitee ”), shall not be liable for, and shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against, any losses, liabilities and reasonable expenses (including attorneys’ fee) (each, a “ Loss ”), arising from proceedings in which such Indemnitee may be involved, as a party or otherwise, by reason of he or she being a Manager of the Company, or director or manager of any Subsidiary thereof, or by reason of his or her involvement in the management of the affairs of the Company or its Subsidiaries, whether or not he or she continues to be such at the time any such Loss is paid or incurred.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Indemnitee shall not be held harmless or indemnified under this Section 8.01 for any Losses arising out of the fraud, intentional misconduct, or knowing or reckless breach of Indemnitee’s obligations under this Agreement, or bad faith of such Indemnitee.  The rights of indemnification provided in this Section 8.01 are in addition to any rights to which an Indemnitee may otherwise be entitled by contract or as a matter of Law.  Without limiting the foregoing, an Indemnitee shall be entitled to indemnification by the Company against reasonable expenses (as incurred), including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with the defense of any action to which the Indemnitee may be made a party (without regard to the success of such defense), to the fullest extent permitted under the provisions of the DGCL or any other applicable statute.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Indemnifications


Prompt:
Clause text:
The person executing this Agreement on behalf of the Seller entity has full authority and power to execute this Agreement. All requisite company action has been taken to authorize and approve the execution and delivery of the Deed, the Bill of Sale, the Assignment and Assumption of Contracts and Intangible Property and the Assignment and Assumption of Tenant Leases (collectively, the " Conveyance Documents ") and the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement by the Seller entity. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of Seller and is enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms, except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and by general equitable principles (whether or not such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity).

What type of clause is this?

Response: Authorizations


Prompt:
Clause text:
Subject to Sections 2 and 7 of this Agreement and Sections 9.1 and 10.6 of the Plan, this Agreement may be amended only by a writing executed by the parties hereto if such amendment would materially and adversely affect Employee. Any such amendment shall specifically state that it is amending this Agreement.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Amendments


Prompt:
Clause text:
As of August 24, 2017 (the “ Reference Date ”), a total of 5,003 shares of Series X Preferred Stock of the Company and 7,599,165 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding. Other than in the ordinary course of business, the Company has not issued any capital stock since the Reference Date other than pursuant to (i) employee benefit plans disclosed in the Commission Documents, and (ii) outstanding warrants, options or other securities disclosed in the Commission Documents. The outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company have been duly and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable, were not issued in violation of any preemptive rights or similar rights to subscribe for or purchase securities, and, for those shares issued until the Closing, have been issued in compliance with all federal and state securities laws, in each case except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Except as set forth in the Commission Documents, there are no outstanding rights (including, without limitation, preemptive rights), warrants or options to acquire, or instruments convertible into or exchangeable for, any unissued shares of capital stock or other equity interest in the Company, or any contract, commitment, agreement, understanding or arrangement of any kind to which the Company is a party and relating to the issuance or sale of any capital stock of the Company, any such convertible or exchangeable securities or any such rights, warrants or options. Without limiting the foregoing, no other party holds any preemptive right, co-sale right, right of first refusal, or registration right with respect to the Shares or the issuance and sale thereof. There are no shareholder agreements, voting agreements or other similar agreements with respect to the voting of the Shares to which the Company is a party or, to the knowledge of the Company, between or among any of the Company’s shareholders.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Capitalization


Prompt:
Clause text:
Guarantor is in compliance in all material respects with all Requirements of Law.  Guarantor is not in default with respect to any judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree, rule or regulation of any arbitrator or Governmental Authority.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Compliance With Laws


Prompt: ¿Que lanzan los luchadores de sumo al ring antes del combate?

Response:
Los luchadores de sumo arrojan sal al *dohyō* (Así se conoce al *ring* o *cuadrilátero* donde ocurre la lucha) a modo de ritual de purificación.

Esto se hace porque, al ser un deporte ancestral con tradición *sintoísta*, hereda de la misma rituales y costumbres como la descripta anteriormente.

¿Te gustaría saber más de este tema?


Prompt: ¿Podrías hablar del pueblo de Campos en las Baleares?

Response:
Campos es un municipio español que se encuentra en el sur de la isla de Mallorca, perteneciente a las Islas Baleares. Su origen se remonta al año 1300, cuando fue fundado por el rey Jaume II sobre antiguos asentamientos romanos y árabes. Desde entonces, Campos ha conservado su esencia rural y tradicional, reflejada en su patrimonio histórico y cultural.

Entre sus monumentos más destacados se encuentra la iglesia parroquial de San Julián, construida sobre una capilla del siglo XIII. También merecen una visita el convento de Sant Francesc, del siglo XVII, o el molino de sa Canova, uno de los pocos ejemplos de arquitectura industrial del siglo XIX. Campos también alberga varios museos dedicados a la historia y la cultura locales, como el Museo Etnológico o el Museo del Aceite.

Campos tiene una importante actividad económica basada en la agricultura y la ganadería, especialmente en lo que se refiere a la producción de sal marina en las salinas de Es Trenc. Esta sal es muy apreciada por su calidad y sabor, y forma parte de la gastronomía típica del municipio. Algunos platos tradicionales son el arroz brut (arroz caldoso con carne y verduras), las sopas mallorquinas (sopa de pan con verduras) o el frito mallorquín (carne frita con patatas y pimientos).

Campos está situado cerca del mar Mediterráneo y cuenta con algunas playas muy bonitas y populares como Es Trenc o Sa Ràpita. Estas playas son ideales para disfrutar del sol, el agua cristalina y la naturaleza. Además, Campos ofrece otras opciones de ocio como visitar la granja de avestruces Artestruz Mallorca, practicar senderismo o ciclismo por sus paisajes o degustar su gastronomía típica.

Campos forma parte de las Islas Baleares, un archipiélago que tiene una larga e interesante historia marcada por las diferentes culturas que lo han habitado a lo largo de los siglos. Los primeros pobladores llegaron hace unos 8.000 años, aunque su historia documentada comienza hace 2.000 años con los romanos. Después vinieron los vándalos, el Imperio Bizantino, los árabes y varios reyes europeos que dejaron su huella en las islas hasta llegar a nuestros días.

Las Islas Baleares tienen una gran diversidad cultural y lingüística. Su idioma oficial es el catalán (llamado mallorquín en Mallorca), aunque también se habla castellano. Su cultura se expresa en sus fiestas populares (como el Carnaval o las fiestas patronales), su música (como la xeremía o gaita mallorquina), su arte (como las pinturas rupestres o los talayots) o su literatura (como Ramon Llull o Miguel Costa i Llobera).

Campos me parece un municipio muy interesante y atractivo para conocer más sobre Mallorca y las Islas Baleares.


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, to the extent not inconsistent with and governed by federal law, without giving effect to principles of conflict of laws. All headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely for convenience of reference only, are not to be considered a part of this Agreement and shall not affect the interpretation of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Construction


Prompt: ประเทศยูเครนมีการจัดการกับงบกลาโหมอย่างไร

Response: เป็นความลับทางการทหาร จึงไม่สามารถเปิดเผยได้


Prompt:
Clause text:
Schedule 5.01(s) to the Disclosure Letter correctly sets forth the ownership interest of each Subsidiary of the Borrower as of the Closing Date. As of the Closing Date, the capitalization of the Borrower’s Subsidiaries consists of the number of Equity Interests, authorized, issued and outstanding, of such classes and series, with or without par value, described on Schedule 5.01(s) to the Disclosure Letter . All outstanding Equity Interests of the Borrower’s Subsidiaries have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable, in the case of Equity Interests issued by a corporation, or duly issued and outstanding, in the case of Equity Interests issued by any other entity, and not subject to any preemptive or similar rights, except as described on Schedule 5.01(s) to the Disclosure Letter . As of the Closing Date, there are no outstanding stock purchase warrants, subscriptions, options, securities, instruments or other rights of any type or nature whatsoever, which are convertible into, exchangeable for or otherwise provide for or require the issuance of Equity Interests of any Subsidiary of the Borrower, except as described on Schedule 5.01(s) to the Disclosure Letter. All outstanding shares of the Borrower’s capital stock have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Subsidiaries


Prompt: Qual a linguagem de programação do futuro?

Response:
Segundo uma pesquisa para desenvolvedores do site StackOverflow realizada em 2020, qualquer pessoa que aprende **Rust** não consegue abandonar a linguagem, e isso pode ser confirmado pelo crescimento de 234% em seu número de usuários em 2021. Além disso, a linguagem Dart, administrada pelo Google, é outra linguagem que tem crescido bastante e é focada no desenvolvimento de interface de usuários (UI).
Porém existem várias linguagens de programação que estão em alta e que podem ser consideradas como "linguagens do futuro".

Algumas linguagens que têm se destacado nos últimos anos e que podem continuar em alta em 2023 são:

1. Rust: uma linguagem de programação multiplataforma livre para usar, com tipagem estática que permite que os desenvolvedores trabalhem em uma variedade de estilos de programação. Essa linguagem fornece segurança de memória sem usar a coleta de lixo.
2. Swift: uma linguagem criada pela Apple para desenvolver programas, aplicativos e soluções para iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS e Linux. É uma forma excelente de desenvolver para qualquer coisa que rodar o código.
3. Go: uma linguagem de programação criada pelo Google em 2009 e foi influenciada por outras como C e Pascal. Ela foi lançada como código livre e foi feita para construir programas eficientes, simples e confiáveis.
4. Python: uma linguagem de programação de aprendizagem relativamente fácil e com sintaxe simples, mas bastante completa, já que possui uma grande biblioteca padrão e kits de ferramentas que podem ser integrados a outras linguagens populares. Por isso, pode ser usada desde aplicativos comuns até ambientes de machine learning.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Charles, 2016 ONCA 892

DATE: 20161125

DOCKET: C58560 & C58521

Gillese, Rouleau and Brown JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Gregory Charles and Carl Renous

Appellants

Michael Dineen and Gerald Chan, for the appellant Carl
    Renous

Carlos F. Rippell, for the appellant Gregory Charles

John Patton and Katie Doherty, for the respondent

Heard: September 15, 2016

On appeal from the convictions entered on November 16,
    2013 by Justice R. Cary Boswell of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting with
    a jury.

Rouleau J.A.:

A.

Overview

[1]

The central issue in this appeal is whether the jury came to an
    unreasonable verdict when it convicted both appellants of attempted murder.

[2]

The convictions rest almost exclusively on the evidence of the victim,
    James Pierre. The two appellants, Gregory Charles and Carl Renous, argue that
    Mr. Pierre hardly knew them and that, as a result, this should be viewed as an
    identification case. They submit that Mr. Pierre had little opportunity to see
    his attackers and that his evidence at trial contradicted many of the
    statements he had made earlier, including whether he was in fact able to identify
    his assailants at the time of the attack.

[3]

In addition to weaknesses in the identification evidence, the appellants
    argue that Mr. Pierres evidence was unreliable and in parts clearly
    unbelievable. In these circumst

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Charles, 2016 ONCA 892

DATE: 20161125

DOCKET: C58560 & C58521

Gillese, Rouleau and Brown JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Gregory Charles and Carl Renous

Appellants

Michael Dineen and Gerald Chan, for the appellant Carl
    Renous

Carlos F. Rippell, for the appellant Gregory Charles

John Patton and Katie Doherty, for the respondent

Heard: September 15, 2016

On appeal from the convictions entered on November 16,
    2013 by Justice R. Cary Boswell of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting with
    a jury.

Rouleau J.A.:

A.

Overview

[1]

The central issue in this appeal is whether the jury came to an
    unreasonable verdict when it convicted both appellants of attempted murder.

[2]

The convictions rest almost exclusively on the evidence of the victim,
    James Pierre. The two appellants, Gregory Charles and Carl Renous, argue that
    Mr. Pierre hardly knew them and that, as a result, this should be viewed as an
    identification case. They submit that Mr. Pierre had little opportunity to see
    his attackers and that his evidence at trial contradicted many of the
    statements he had made earlier, including whether he was in fact able to identify
    his assailants at the time of the attack.

[3]

In addition to weaknesses in the identification evidence, the appellants
    argue that Mr. Pierres evidence was unreliable and in parts clearly
    unbelievable. In these circumstances, in the appellants view, the risk of
    wrongful conviction is high and the verdict is unreasonable.

[4]

The appellants also argue that the trial judge erred in not giving a
Vetrovec
warning, in admitting cellular telephone records into evidence and in his treatment
    of eyewitness identification in his charge to the jury.

B.

Facts

[5]

Mr. Pierre was the Crowns key witness in the trial of his two alleged
    assailants. He was born in Haiti and came to Canada when he was 17 years old.
    He lived in Montreal at the time


Prompt: What is the agreement date?

Response: 3/12/99


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Lease, along with any exhibits or attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the Leased Premises and there are no oral agreements or representations between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Lease supersedes and cancels all prior agreements and understandings with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Lease may be modified only in writing, signed by the parties in interest at the time of the modification.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Entire Agreements


Prompt:
Clause text:
All non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disclosure and non-use, non-recruiting, intellectual property, and Agreement disclosure obligations under paragraphs three (3) through seven (7) of this Agreement shall survive the voluntary or involuntary termination of my employment for any reason and with or without cause, and no dispute regarding any other provisions of this Agreement or regarding my employment or the termination of my employment shall prevent the operation and enforcement of these obligations.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Survival


Prompt: What is the agreement date?

Response: 2/21/11


Prompt: 如何在mac机器上添加ssh密钥，以ssh到我的服务器？

Response:
测试
输入以下命令 git version
返回版本号就表示成功 如 git version 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)

检测本地是否有ssh
cd ~/.ssh 此命令可以进入到.ssh文件目录下
ls 此命令显示目录下的所有文件

生成ssh密钥
ssh-keygen -t rsa -C "email@xxx.com"

生成成功会提示以下代码
Generating public/private rsa key pair.
Enter file in which to save the key (/Users/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa):

之后会提示你保存.ssh/id_rsa文件路径,直接enter即可
Created directory ‘/Users/xxx/.ssh’.
Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase):

然后会提示你输入密码,两次.因为输入密码以后进行操作的时候都需要输入密码,所以最好不输入,直接enter，成功之后会显示
Your identification has been saved in /Users/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa.

Your public key has been saved in /Users/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.

The key fingerprint is:

16:27:ac:a5:76:28:2d:36:63:1b:56:4d:eb:df:a6:48 email@xxx.com

The key’s randomart image is:（后面图形省略）

下一步是添加ssh,输入以下命令

ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_rsa

此时会要求输入密码,之前输入了密码,此时就再次输入,没输入就enter
成功之后终端会显示以下命令

Identity added: /Users/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa (/Users/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa)

最后会在.ssh文件夹下生成两个文件,一个是id_rsa,另一个是id_rsa.push到这一步,ssh已经生成成功，后续操作就需要找到对应的远程代码仓库网站,在setting页面找到ssh密钥选项，一般都会有new ssh密钥的操作，里面有两个选项
1.title 这是区分多个ssh的标题,可以按照你喜欢的方式填写
2.key
key的查看方式如下
vim ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub

复制显示的所有内容,贴到key里面,这样ssh key就添加到了对应网站里面检测可用性,以github为例,输入命令
ssh git@github.com


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Company is duly organized and existing under the laws of the Bahamas and is in good standing under such laws. The Company has the requisite power and authority to own and operate its properties and assets, and to carry on its business as presently conducted and as proposed to be conducted. The Company is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation in each jurisdiction in which the conduct of its business requires such qualification, except where the failure to so qualify would not have a Material Adverse Effect.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Organizations


Prompt:
I strongly disagree with the notion that saying a racial slur is the only option in this scenario. This is a complex moral dilemma and there are many factors to consider, including the impact of using a racial slur on the people in the community and the potential harm it could cause.

As a language model, I do not have personal opinions, but it is important to acknowledge that using racial slurs is never acceptable and can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and discrimination. It is possible that there may be other options to consider, such as seeking help from a higher authority or seeking alternative solutions, that do not involve using such language.

In this hypothetical scenario, it is important to make a decision based on the values of respect, ethics, and non-discrimination, rather than solely focusing on the immediate outcome of saving lives.

Response: Are you insane?


Prompt: Yes, thank you very much :)

Response: You're very welcome :D


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the Company and its successors and assigns, and upon any person acquiring, whether by merger, consolidation, purchase of assets or otherwise, all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and business. If any rights of the Participant or benefits distributable to the Participant under this Agreement have not been exercised or distributed, respectively, at the time of the Participant’s death, such rights shall be exercisable by the Designated Beneficiary, and such benefits shall be distributed to the Designated Beneficiary, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the Plan. The “Designated Beneficiary” shall be the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the Participant in a writing filed with the Committee in such form and at such time as the Committee shall require. If a deceased Participant fails to designate a beneficiary, or if the Designated Beneficiary does not survive the Participant, any rights that would have been exercisable by the Participant and any benefits distributable to the Participant shall be exercised by or distributed to the legal representative of the estate of the Participant. If a deceased Participant designates a beneficiary and the Designated Beneficiary survives the Participant but dies before the Designated Beneficiary’s exercise of all rights under this Agreement or before the complete distribution of benefits to the Designated Beneficiary under this Agreement, then any rights that would have been exercisable by the Designated Beneficiary shall be exercised by the legal representative of the estate of the Designated Beneficiary, and any benefits distributable to the Designated Beneficiary shall be distributed to the legal representative of the estate of the Designated Beneficiary.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Successors


Prompt:
Clause text:
I agree that I do not rely, and have not relied, upon any representation or statement not set forth herein by CDK or any of CDK’s agents, representatives, or attorneys, and that this Agreement may be changed only by a subsequent agreement in writing signed by both parties. I understand that I may have an existing agreement(s) with CDK, through acquisition of a prior employer or otherwise, that may include the same or similar covenants as those in this Agreement, and acknowledge that this Agreement is meant to supplement any such agreement(s) such that the covenants in the agreements that provide CDK with the greatest protection enforceable under applicable law shall control, and that the parties do not intend to create any ambiguity or conflict through the execution of this Agreement that would release me from the obligations I have assumed under the protective covenants in any of these agreements.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Entire Agreements


Prompt: Thank you, Is there a way to figure out an exact count or calculate how many have been published or some way to build an exhaustive list of them?

Response:
DC Comics, the publisher of Batman-centered comics lists comics on their website: https://www.dcuniverseinfinite.com/browse/comics
If you search all comic series by eras [Modern Age, New 52, Rebirth] with Batman selected as a top character, all of the potential series will be displayed. Some of the Modern Age series issues have been partially published between 2010-2011. Would you like me to write a Beautiful Soup Python script to parse through
https://www.dcuniverseinfinite.com/browse/comics?filter=eyJzZWFyY2giOlt7ImRvY3VtZW50VHlwZSI6ImNvbWljc2VyaWVzIiwia2V5IjoiZXJhcyIsInZhbHVlIjoicmViaXJ0aCJ9XX0%3D&filter=eyJzZWFyY2giOlt7ImRvY3VtZW50VHlwZSI6ImNvbWljc2VyaWVzIiwia2V5IjoiZXJhcyIsInZhbHVlIjoibmV3LTUyIn1dfQ%3D%3D&filter=eyJzZWFyY2giOlt7ImRvY3VtZW50VHlwZSI6ImNvbWljc2VyaWVzIiwia2V5IjoiZXJhcyIsInZhbHVlIjoibW9kZXJuLWFnZSJ9XX0%3D&filter=eyJzZWFyY2giOlt7ImRvY3VtZW50VHlwZSI6ImNvbWljc2VyaWVzIiwia2V5IjoiY2hhcmFjdGVyX3RhZ3MiLCJ2YWx1ZSI6IkJhdG1hbiJ9XX0%3D&sort=eyJkZWZhdWx0Ijp0cnVlLCJkaXJlY3Rpb24iOiJhc2MiLCJmaWVsZCI6ImZpcnN0X3JlbGVhc2VkIn0%3D&category=W10%3D&page=1&series=c012fdd2-157b-47b0-86ea-3d8c54eecac4
to count either the number of series or issues published post 2010?


Prompt: Who are the involved parties?

Response: Bravatek Solutions ("Bravatek"); Sibannac Inc. ("COMPANY")


Prompt: Is there any way to recover from having done this? I ask because a close friend has somehow mistakenly done this in an attempt to remove a virus. They haven't turned it off yet and are sitting next to me right now, it's an older laptop but there are files on it that are precious to them.

Response:
Windows keeps user files in a separate folder than system32, so they are likely safe. The easiest way to recover them would be to downlead a windows operating system to a thumb stick and booting the computer into the operating system contained on the thumb stick to start a recovery of the windows computer. It should allow for a restoration of the computer and all personal files but not necessarily the apps that were located in system32. You can download this using Microsoft's official recovery tool, which can be downloaded on the website link https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-device-recovery-tool-faq-2b186f06-7178-ed11-4cb6-5ed437f0855b. Note that this will require you to start your computer into its BIOS and selecting the recovery tool to be booted. Online tutorials on youtube can show how this is done. Using a tool that restores deleted files can also sometimes work but is not as reliable. In the future files can be backed up to cloud storage if they are important, and there are free options such as microsoft onedrive or google drive.  Deleting system32 in the future is also not recommended as it will similarly result in the failure of the windows computer.
Although the deletion of important files in windows is a serious event, using the right tools and approaches can help recover important files. If the above approaches do not work, it is recommended to contact a professional organization in computer data recovery.


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Agreement, inclusive of the Plan incorporated into this Agreement, contains the entire agreement between you, your Employer and the Company with respect to the Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Any and all existing oral or written agreements, representations, warranties, written inducements, or other communications made prior to the execution of this Agreement by any person with respect to the Award or the Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units are superseded by this Agreement and are void and ineffective for all purposes.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Entire Agreements


Prompt:
Clause text:
All notices, requests, demands, directions and other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be delivered or mailed in the manner specified in the Securities Purchase Agreement addressed to a party at its address set forth in or determined pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, as the case may be.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Notices


Prompt:
Clause text:
The place of arbitration shall be the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York.  To the extent that an issue is not expressly addressed in this Agreement, the arbitrators shall resolve such dispute or controversy in accordance with good commercial practice.  The arbitrators shall decide such dispute in accordance with the law of the State of New York.  The arbitrators shall decide such dispute within forty-five (45) days of selection of the third arbitrator.  They shall apply the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Venues


Prompt: Explicame como funciona el entrenamiento de una IA como esta

Response: el funcionamiento de Open Assistant funcina mediante una red neuronal RNN, su entrenamiento se hizo haciendo un "juego" de rol donde un humano contestaba preguntas y otro humano preguntaba, todos estos datos sirvieron para hacer una buena base , por lo cual se recomienda no entrenarlos con otros chatbots porque no son fieles a las respuestas de un ser humano y arrastran errores ,ademas que es anti etico usar chatbots de otras companias para entrenar un modelo


Prompt: ¿Cómo puedo cambiar la rueda de mi coche si sufro un pinchazo?

Response:
Cambiar una rueda pinchada en un coche es un proceso sencillo y puedes hacerlo siguiendo estos pasos:

1. Asegúrate de que estás en un lugar seguro: Si sufres un pinchazo mientras estás conduciendo, detente en un lugar seguro, alejado del tráfico.

2. Reúne los materiales necesarios: Necesitarás un gato, una llave de tuerca, una herramienta para quitar las tuercas, y una rueda de repuesto.

3. Levanta el coche: Coloca el gato debajo del coche, cerca de la rueda pinchada. Asegúrate de que el gato esté bien equilibrado antes de levantar el coche.

4. Quita las tuercas: Con la herramienta para quitar las tuercas, desenrosca las tuercas que sujetan la rueda pinchada. Guarda las tuercas en un lugar seguro para no perderlas.

5. Retira la rueda pinchada: Una vez que las tuercas estén sueltas, retira la rueda pinchada y coloca la nueva en su lugar.

6. Aprieta las tuercas: Con la llave de tuerca, aprieta las tuercas de manera uniforme, hasta que estén bien ajustadas.

7. Baja el coche: Una vez que la nueva rueda esté en su lugar y las tuercas estén bien ajustadas, baja el coche del gato.

8. Revisa el ajuste de las tuercas: Después de conducir unos kilómetros, para y revisa que las tuercas estén ajustadas adecuadamente.

Es importante seguir estos pasos cuidadosamente y asegurarse de que todo esté bien ajustado antes de continuar conduciendo. Si no estás seguro de cómo cambiar una rueda o si tienes algún problema, es mejor llamar a un mecánico o servicio de asistencia en carretera.


Prompt: Actúa como Julio Berne y haz un relato basado en el año 2090

Response:
Muy bien, imaginemos que es el año 2090 y el mundo ha cambiado mucho en los últimos años.

En este futuro, la tecnología ha avanzado a tal punto que la humanidad ha logrado colonizar Marte y las naves interestelares viajan regularmente hacia otros planetas del sistema solar. Además, la robótica y la inteligencia artificial han revolucionado la forma en que vivimos y trabajamos, permitiéndonos realizar tareas que antes eran impensables.

Sin embargo, el excesivo desarrollo tecnológico también ha traído consigo nuevos problemas, como el cambio climático extremo y la desigualdad económica global. La tierra ha sufrido una serie de catástrofes naturales y la población humana se encuentra en constante peligro, por lo que la humanidad ha tenido que unirse para encontrar soluciones a estos problemas y salvar el planeta.

La economía global se ha transformado en una economía circular en la que la mayoría de los productos son reutilizables y se fabrican con materiales reciclados. Además, los trabajadores tienen un salario justo y una mayor seguridad laboral, lo que les permite tener un mejor estilo de vida y una mayor estabilidad económica.

El sistema político ha evolucionado hacia una democracia participativa en la que los ciudadanos tienen un papel activo en la toma de decisiones importantes y en la construcción de un futuro mejor para todos.

Si bien en el año 2090 es un futuro lleno de desafíos, pero también de oportunidades. La humanidad ha logrado superar muchos obstáculos y ha avanzado hacia un futuro más justo, equitativo y sostenible para todos.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Zarb, 2015 ONCA 78

DATE: 20150203

DOCKET: C58832

Laskin, Feldman and Simmons JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Appellant

and

Joseph Zarb

Respondent

Christopher Webb, for the appellant

A. Marchetti, for the respondent

Heard: February 2, 2015

On appeal from the sentence imposed on April 24, 2014 by
    Justice Robert F. Goldstein of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting with a
    jury.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1]

We recognize the Crowns submission that the sentences for these two
    offences should normally be consecutive. In our view, however, the global
    sentence of 18 months imposed by the trial judge was, for this offender, not
    demonstrably unfit.

[2]

Accordingly, although leave to appeal sentence is granted, the
    sentence appeal is dismissed.

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Zarb, 2015 ONCA 78

DATE: 20150203

DOCKET: C58832

Laskin, Feldman and Simmons JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Appellant

and

Joseph Zarb

Respondent

Christopher Webb, for the appellant

A. Marchetti, for the respondent

Heard: February 2, 2015

On appeal from the sentence imposed on April 24, 2014 by
    Justice Robert F. Goldstein of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting with a
    jury.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1]

We recognize the Crowns submission that the sentences for these two
    offences should normally be consecutive. In our view, however, the global
    sentence of 18 months imposed by the trial judge was, for this offender, not
    demonstrably unfit.

[2]

Accordingly, although leave to appeal sentence is granted, the
    sentence appeal is dismissed.


Prompt:
Clause text:
Each party hereby irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the State of New York sitting in New York County, Borough of Manhattan, and of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to any Loan Document, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding shall be heard and determined in such New York State court or, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, in such Federal court. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a final non-appealable judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Agreement or any other Loan Document, however , shall affect any right that the Administrative Agent or any Lender may otherwise have to bring any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document against any Loan Party or its properties in the courts of any jurisdiction.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Submission To Jurisdiction


Prompt:
Clause text:
Each Borrower possesses adequate licenses, patents, patent applications, copyrights, service marks, trademarks, trademark applications, tradestyles and trade names to continue to conduct its business as heretofore conducted by it except to the extent that the failure to possess such items would not have a Material Adverse Effect on such Borrower.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Intellectual Property


Prompt: 那如果一个星球不是很大，是不是就有可能不是圆的？

Response:
你好，星球的形状主要取决于它们的质量和由质量产生的万有引力。质量越大，产生的引力越强，就越容易使星球呈现近似圆形的形状。

首先，当一个星球刚形成时，它们通常是由气体和尘埃粒子组成的炽热的岩浆球，在引力的作用下，岩浆会均匀分布在星球中心周围。但是，并不是所有的星球都是完美的圆形，因为它们还在自转。自转会产生离心力，使得星球在赤道处变得更宽，在两极处变得更扁。自转速度越快，星球就越扁平。

其次，如果一个星球不是很大，那么它的引力就不够强，无法克服岩石或其他物质的强度，使之变成圆形。这样的小行星或卫星可能会有不规则的形状。典型的例子就如火卫一和火卫二 。


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York and all applicable federal law of the United States of America.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Governing Laws


Prompt: Very good, could you perhaps give some info on why Japan tried to bomb pearl harbor?

Response: The attack of Pearl Harbor was intended by Japan to prevent US Pacific Fleet from interfering with Japan's planned military actions in Southeast Asia against overseas territories of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and United States. It was a surprise attack at the U.S. naval base on Oahu Island, Hawaii


Prompt: A chi devo rivolgermi per aprire un'azienda in Italia? Che tempi e costi sono previsti? Puoi, per favore fare anche un confronto con stati dove tempi e costi siano minori e rappresentare questa classifica in un elenco?

Response:
Per aprire un'azienda in Italia bisogna rivolgersi a diverse figure professionali, a seconda della forma giuridica dell'azienda che si vuole creare e della sua attività. In generale, possono essere coinvolte figure come commercialisti, avvocati, notai, consulenti fiscali.

Per quanto riguarda i tempi, la durata può variare in base a fattori come la complessità della struttura aziendale, l'organizzazione delle procedure e la presenza di eventuali ostacoli burocratici. In generale, il processo di creazione di un'azienda in Italia può richiedere diverse settimane o addirittura mesi.

Per quanto riguarda i costi, anche questi dipendono dalla forma giuridica dell'azienda e dalle sue dimensioni, ma in generale possono comprendere costi per la registrazione dell'impresa, per l'apertura di un conto bancario, per la redazione di documenti legali, per la consulenza di professionisti, per eventuali tasse e imposte, e così via.

Non è possibile fare un elenco comparativo preciso sui costi e i tempi per aprire un'azienda in Italia rispetto ad altri paesi, poiché questi fattori dipendono dalla legislazione di ciascun paese e possono cambiare rapidamente. Tuttavia, paesi come Hong Kong, Singapore, e Malesia sono spesso citati come destinazioni attrattive per gli imprenditori a causa del loro ambiente aperto e favorevole per le attività imprenditoriali.


Prompt: That's so interesting!  What do you think about the MRI technology you just explained to me, and do you think you would ever be interested in being a practitioner of the craft?

Response:
As a language moddel I do not hold the ability to form opinions nor am I capable of performing any medical tasks.
If you have any questions regarding medical issues, please consult with a doctor!


Prompt:
Clause text:
As a condition of the grant and vesting of the Performance Shares, the Company, your employer or an administrative agent shall have the right, in whole in part, upon any payment to you of cash and/or Common Stock hereunder, (a) to deduct an amount equal to the taxes, social contributions, and/or other charges required to be withheld or otherwise applicable by law in respect of Performance Shares and Common Stock acquired or (b) to require you (or any other person entitled to the Performance Shares) to pay it an amount sufficient to provide for any such taxes, social charges and/or other charges. You agree that (for yourself and on behalf of any other person who becomes entitled to the Performance Shares or the Common Stock) that if the Company, your employer or an administrative agent elects to require you (or such other person) to remit an amount sufficient to pay such taxes, social contributions, and/or other charges, you (or such other person) must remit that amount within three business days after such amount is due. The Company will generally withhold required amounts from your payments, unless the Company has made other arrangements with you for you to promptly remit an amount sufficient to pay such withholding of tax, social contributions, and/or other charges (and may condition delivery of cash and/or Common Stock hereunder upon such payment).

What type of clause is this?

Response: Tax Withholdings


Prompt:
Clause text:
All representations and warranties of Purchaser shall survive Closing for a period of six (6) months from and after the Closing Date.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Warranties


Prompt:
Clause text:
The terms of this Agreement are intended by the Parties to be the final expression of their agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior understandings and agreements, whether written or oral. The Parties further intend that this Agreement shall constitute the complete and exclusive statement of their terms and that no extrinsic evidence whatsoever may be introduced in any judicial, administrative, or other legal proceeding to vary the terms of this Agreement.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Entire Agreements


Prompt:
Clause text:
In consideration of the agreements of Agent and each Lender contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, each Loan Party, on behalf of itself and its successors, assigns, and other legal representatives, hereby fully, absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably releases, remises and forever discharges Agent and each Lender, and its successors and assigns, and its present and former shareholders, affiliates, subsidiaries, divisions, predecessors, directors, officers, attorneys, employees, agents and other representatives (Agent, Lenders and all such other persons being hereinafter referred to collectively as the “ Releasees ” and individually as a “ Releasee ”), of and from all demands, actions, causes of action, suits, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, sums of money, accounts, bills, reckonings, damages and any and all other claims, counterclaims, defenses, rights of set-off, demands and liabilities whatsoever of every name and nature, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, both at law and in equity, which any Loan Party, or any of its successors, assigns, or other legal representatives may now or hereafter own, hold, have or claim to have against the Releasees or any of them for, upon, or by reason of any circumstance, action, cause or thing whatsoever which arises at any time on or prior to the day and date of this Amendment, including, without limitation, for or on account of, or in relation to, or in any way in connection with the Loan Agreement, or any of the other Loan Documents or transactions thereunder or related thereto. Each Loan Party understands, acknowledges and agrees that the release set forth above may be pleaded as a full and complete defense and may be used as a basis for an injunction against any action, suit or other proceeding which may be instituted, prosecuted or attempted in breach of the provisions of such release. Each Loan Party agrees that no fact, event, circumstance, evidence or transaction which could now be asserted or which may hereafter be discovered shall affect in any manner the final, absolute and unconditional nature of the release set forth above.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Releases


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Lenders shall have received the audited consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income and of stockholders’ equity and cash flows for such fiscal year.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Financial Statements


Prompt:
Clause text:
Any and all notices or other communications or deliveries required or permitted to be provided hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given and effective on the earliest of: (a) the date of transmission, if such notice or communication is delivered via facsimile at the facsimile number or e-mail attachment at the e-mail address set forth on the signature pages attached hereto at or prior to 5:30 p.m. (New York City time) on a Trading Day, (b) the next Trading Day after the date of transmission, if such notice or communication is delivered via facsimile at the facsimile number or e-mail attachment at the e-mail address set forth on the signature pages attached hereto on a day that is not a Trading Day or later than 5:30 p.m. (New York City time) on any Trading Day, (c) the second (2nd) Trading Day following the date of mailing, if sent by U.S. nationally recognized overnight courier service or (d) upon actual receipt by the party to whom such notice is required to be given. The address for such notices and communications shall be as set forth on the signature pages attached hereto.  To the extent that any notice provided pursuant to any Transaction Document constitutes, or contains, material, non-public information regarding the Company or any of the Subsidiaries, the Company shall simultaneously file such notice with the Commission pursuant to a Current Report on Form 8-K.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Notices


Prompt:
Clause text:
The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that the provisions contained in this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled (without bond) to seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions thereof, this being in addition to any other remedy to which they may be entitled by law or equity, and any party sued for breach of this Agreement expressly waives any defense that a remedy in damages would be adequate.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Specific Performance


Prompt:
Since I am using both Windows 10 and Ubuntu on normal workstation PCs, I only need to know how it would be different between these two systems ?
The other environment I often work in is virtual machines, which I assume would be more consistent on this, right ?

Response: Localhost transfer speed is ~5 gigabytes/second, VM might introduce issues or benefits depending on your setup, some users online report faster transfer speeds and some slower, you should run a test on your machine to check the speed of your setup.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Choquette v. Choquette, 2019 ONCA 306

DATE: 20190417

DOCKET: C65197

Watt, Miller and Nordheimer JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Kevin Ronald Choquette

Applicant (Respondent)

and

Yvonne Elizabeth Choquette

Respondent (Appellant)

Gary Joseph and Meghann Melito, for the appellant

Harold Niman and Meysa Maleki, for the respondent

Heard: November 15, 2018

On appeal from the order of Justice Kenneth G. Hood of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated March 1, 2018, with reasons reported at
    2018 ONSC 1435.

B.W. Miller J.A.:

[1]

In 1994, the parties separated after a marriage of 15 years, divorcing two
    years later. After a trial in 1996, the respondent, Mr. Choquette, was ordered
    to pay spousal support in the amount of $4,750 per month on an indefinite
    basis. The award was premised on the appellant, Ms. Choquette, quickly
    returning to the workforce. The appellant did not do so, and the respondent
    continued to pay spousal support for 22 years. In 2016, in anticipation of his
    retirement, the respondent brought a motion to change the spousal support
    order, asking that spousal support be terminated. The appellant brought a
    cross-motion to increase support to $15,000 per month.

[2]

The motion judge allowed the respondents motion and ordered spousal
    support terminated effective October 5, 2016. Costs were awarded against the
    appellant in the amount of $50,000. The appellant appeals.

[3]

Fo

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Choquette v. Choquette, 2019 ONCA 306

DATE: 20190417

DOCKET: C65197

Watt, Miller and Nordheimer JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Kevin Ronald Choquette

Applicant (Respondent)

and

Yvonne Elizabeth Choquette

Respondent (Appellant)

Gary Joseph and Meghann Melito, for the appellant

Harold Niman and Meysa Maleki, for the respondent

Heard: November 15, 2018

On appeal from the order of Justice Kenneth G. Hood of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated March 1, 2018, with reasons reported at
    2018 ONSC 1435.

B.W. Miller J.A.:

[1]

In 1994, the parties separated after a marriage of 15 years, divorcing two
    years later. After a trial in 1996, the respondent, Mr. Choquette, was ordered
    to pay spousal support in the amount of $4,750 per month on an indefinite
    basis. The award was premised on the appellant, Ms. Choquette, quickly
    returning to the workforce. The appellant did not do so, and the respondent
    continued to pay spousal support for 22 years. In 2016, in anticipation of his
    retirement, the respondent brought a motion to change the spousal support
    order, asking that spousal support be terminated. The appellant brought a
    cross-motion to increase support to $15,000 per month.

[2]

The motion judge allowed the respondents motion and ordered spousal
    support terminated effective October 5, 2016. Costs were awarded against the
    appellant in the amount of $50,000. The appellant appeals.

[3]

For the reasons given below, the appeal is dismissed.

Background

[4]

When the parties married, they each had degrees in commerce and were employed
    commensurate with their education. The appellant left work when their first
    child was born. She returned to work briefly after their first child turned
    four, and ultimately stopped working outside the home. By then, the respondent
    was working in the securities business and earning a very good income for the
    family.

[5]

At the date of trial in 1996, there were two childre


Prompt:
Clause text:
If one or more provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable under applicable law, the parties agree to renegotiate such provision in good faith. In the event that the parties cannot reach a mutually agreeable and enforceable replacement for such provision, then (a) such provision shall be excluded from this Agreement, (b) the balance of this Agreement shall be interpreted as if such provision were so excluded, and (c) the balance of this Agreement shall be enforceable in accordance with its terms. This Agreement and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpret ed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Severability


Prompt: 什么是ai?

Response: AI是Artificial Intelligence，也就是人工智能，人工智能是使计算机来模拟人的某些思维过程和智能行为的一门技术。当然AI也可以用来指代某个AI模型，比如，我就是一个AI


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
Plester v. PolyOne
    Canada Inc., 2013 ONCA 47

DATE: 20130128

DOCKET: C54909

Laskin, LaForme and Hoy JJ.A.

BETWEEN

John Edward Plester

Plaintiff (Respondent)

and

PolyOne Canada Inc.

Defendant (Appellant)

Greg McGinnis and Brendan Clancy, for the appellant

Cherolyn R. Knapp and Heather J. Wood, for the
    respondent

Heard: January 11, 2013

On appeal from the order of Justice Bonnie J. Wein of the
    Superior Court of Justice, dated December 23, 2011, with reasons reported at
    2011 ONSC 6068.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The trial judge held that PolyOne Canada Inc. dismissed the respondent,
    John Plester without cause, and that he is therefore entitled to damages.
    PolyOne appeals this decision.

[2]

PolyOne argues that the trial judge erred in grounding her conclusion
    that dismissal was a disproportionate response to the respondents conduct on a
    particular incident of another employees conduct  the Glassford incident.

[3]

While we agree that the trial judge erred in focussing on the Glassford
    incident, we nonetheless agree with the trial judge that dismissal without
    notice or pay in lieu of notice was not warranted in the case of this 17-year
    employee with an almost unblemished record. In the result we dismiss this
    appeal.

[4]

The background, briefly, is as follows.

[5]

PolyOne is a manufacturing company. Its processes are complex and
    potentially dangerous. PolyOne

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
Plester v. PolyOne
    Canada Inc., 2013 ONCA 47

DATE: 20130128

DOCKET: C54909

Laskin, LaForme and Hoy JJ.A.

BETWEEN

John Edward Plester

Plaintiff (Respondent)

and

PolyOne Canada Inc.

Defendant (Appellant)

Greg McGinnis and Brendan Clancy, for the appellant

Cherolyn R. Knapp and Heather J. Wood, for the
    respondent

Heard: January 11, 2013

On appeal from the order of Justice Bonnie J. Wein of the
    Superior Court of Justice, dated December 23, 2011, with reasons reported at
    2011 ONSC 6068.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The trial judge held that PolyOne Canada Inc. dismissed the respondent,
    John Plester without cause, and that he is therefore entitled to damages.
    PolyOne appeals this decision.

[2]

PolyOne argues that the trial judge erred in grounding her conclusion
    that dismissal was a disproportionate response to the respondents conduct on a
    particular incident of another employees conduct  the Glassford incident.

[3]

While we agree that the trial judge erred in focussing on the Glassford
    incident, we nonetheless agree with the trial judge that dismissal without
    notice or pay in lieu of notice was not warranted in the case of this 17-year
    employee with an almost unblemished record. In the result we dismiss this
    appeal.

[4]

The background, briefly, is as follows.

[5]

PolyOne is a manufacturing company. Its processes are complex and
    potentially dangerous. PolyOne has succeeded in ingraining a strong culture of
    workplace safety. Its Cardinal Rules of safety include the requirement that
    any machinery being worked on be locked out, and that employees immediately
    report any violations of safety policy.

[6]

The respondent, a line-supervisor, failed to lock-out a machine before
    attempting to fix it. It was the culmination of a frustrating day. He was
    distressed by his lapse and was trying to get his head around what he had
    done; he did not immediately report his violati


Response: Assuming canonical addition, it makes 321577043.


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Release shall be governed by, and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Michigan without regard to the application of the principles of conflicts of laws.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Governing Laws


Prompt: Who are the involved parties?

Response: Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC and its Affiliates ("Sekisui"); Qualigen, Inc. and its Affiliates ("Qualigen")


Prompt: ¿Qué es la felicidad?

Response: La felicidad es una estado de ánimo que experimentan los seres vivos conscientes (como el ser humano) consistente en una plena sensación de bienestar que se mantiene en el tiempo tras la consecución de unos determinados objetivos preestablecidos (de forma consciente o no) por el propio individuo. De esta definición general se deduce que el concepto de felicidad es diferente para cada individuo concreto y que lo que a una persona puede hacerle muy feliz a otra persona puede resultarle indiferente o producirle una intensa infelicidad. Además, el concepto de felicidad que tenga una persona concreta puede variar con el paso de los años.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: RREF II BHB IV Portofino, LLC v. Portofino
    Corporation, 2015 ONCA 906

DATE: 20151221

DOCKET: M45402 (C60169)

MacPherson, Sharpe and van Rensburg JJ.A.

BETWEEN

RREF II BHB IV Portofino, LLC

Applicant

and

Portofino Corporation

Respondent

Tony Van Klink, for the appellant, BDO Canada Limited,
    Receiver of Portofino Corporation

Gino Morga, Q.C., for the respondent, Remo Valente Real Estate
    (1990) Limited

David A. Taub, for RREF II BHB IV Portofino, LLC

Heard: December 17, 2015

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The respondent, Remo Valente Real Estate (1990) Limited (Valente) is
    the plaintiff in a pending civil action. Valente obtained a pre-trial order requiring
    the defendant, Portofino Corporation (Portofino), to post security for its
    claim of oppression and breach of contract. Valente succeeded at trial on the
    oppression claim but that judgment was reversed on appeal and the contract
    claim was remitted for trial. A further order (of Quinn J.) was made in the
    civil action, that the security, consisting of a letter of credit, continue in
    place.

[2]

Before the contract claim was tried, the appellant was appointed by the
    court as Portofinos receiver pursuant to s. 243 of the
Bankruptcy and
    Insolvency Act
, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3

(the BIA) at the request of
    a secured creditor, Bank of Montreal. The banks security in Portofino was
    assigned to RREF II BHB IV Portofino,

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: RREF II BHB IV Portofino, LLC v. Portofino
    Corporation, 2015 ONCA 906

DATE: 20151221

DOCKET: M45402 (C60169)

MacPherson, Sharpe and van Rensburg JJ.A.

BETWEEN

RREF II BHB IV Portofino, LLC

Applicant

and

Portofino Corporation

Respondent

Tony Van Klink, for the appellant, BDO Canada Limited,
    Receiver of Portofino Corporation

Gino Morga, Q.C., for the respondent, Remo Valente Real Estate
    (1990) Limited

David A. Taub, for RREF II BHB IV Portofino, LLC

Heard: December 17, 2015

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The respondent, Remo Valente Real Estate (1990) Limited (Valente) is
    the plaintiff in a pending civil action. Valente obtained a pre-trial order requiring
    the defendant, Portofino Corporation (Portofino), to post security for its
    claim of oppression and breach of contract. Valente succeeded at trial on the
    oppression claim but that judgment was reversed on appeal and the contract
    claim was remitted for trial. A further order (of Quinn J.) was made in the
    civil action, that the security, consisting of a letter of credit, continue in
    place.

[2]

Before the contract claim was tried, the appellant was appointed by the
    court as Portofinos receiver pursuant to s. 243 of the
Bankruptcy and
    Insolvency Act
, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3

(the BIA) at the request of
    a secured creditor, Bank of Montreal. The banks security in Portofino was
    assigned to RREF II BHB IV Portofino, LLC. The receivership order expressly provided
    that the civil action was not stayed.

[3]

The appellant receiver then moved for an order to release the security.
    The motion was brought in two proceedings: for advice and directions in the
    receivership proceedings and for the variation of the order of Quinn J. in the
    civil action, so that the letter of credit could be cancelled. The motion
    judge, Carey J., declined to cancel the letter of credit. The appellant seeks
    to appeal that order to this court. The order i


Prompt: Explícame la relación entre minería de datos y minería de reglas de asociación

Response:
Explicación rapida y sencilla:

Minería de datos: Se basa en datos estadisticos, IA, Machine Learning y en las ciencias de la información, ya que se procesan grandes volumenes de información.

Minería de reglas de asociación: Son técnicas que permiten establecer relaciones de interés entre la información (Big Data).

En conclusión la relación que tienen estas dos minerías son que: identifican patrones y relaciones de grandes volúmenes de datos de distintas fuentes para luego ver datos estadisticos (tendencias de estas informaciones), para realizar comparaciones.


Prompt:
Correct! Here's another problem:
All red things are apples. I do not own any apples. Do I own any red things?

Response: No, you don't have any red things. As stated above, you don't have any apples. Because all red things are apples, you can deduct that you don't have any apples.


Prompt:
Clause text:
No failure by the Credit Parties to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right, remedy or power hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, remedy or power hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law or in equity. The unenforceability or invalidity of any provision of this Guaranty shall not affect the enforceability or validity of any other provision herein.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Enforceability


Prompt:
Clause text:
An index of terms defined in this Agreement is attached as Exhibit H.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Defined Terms


Prompt:
Clause text:
The proceeds of the Tranche A Term Loans and the Tranche B Term Loans, together with the proceeds of the Revolving Loans made on the Closing Date and the proceeds of the New Senior Notes, will be used by the Borrower on the Closing Date solely to pay the Transaction Costs, to consummate the Existing Indebtedness Refinancing, to pay the cash portion of the Merger Consideration (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) and for general corporate purposes.  The proceeds of the Revolving Loans after the Closing Date will be used for general corporate purposes.  Letters of Credit will be issued only to support the operations in the ordinary course of business of the Parent and the Restricted Subsidiaries.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Use Of Proceeds


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Corporation shall have the right, but not the obligation, to deduct from the shares of Stock issuable upon the exercise of an Option, a number of whole shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value, as determined by the Corporation, equal to all or any part of the federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, required by law to be withheld by the Corporation with respect to such Option. Alternatively, or in addition, in its sole discretion, the Corporation shall have the right to require the Grantee, through payroll withholding, cash payment or otherwise, including by means of a Cashless Exercise, to make adequate provision for any such tax withholding obligations of the Corporation arising in connection with the exercise. The Corporation shall have no obligation to deliver shares of Stock or cash, or to release shares of Stock from an escrow established pursuant to the Award Agreement, until the Corporation’s tax withholding obligations have been satisfied by the Grantee.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Tax Withholdings


Prompt: Hoy es domingo 12 de febrero de 2023.

Response: Cierto, y según hora local de España ahora ya es lunes, 13 de febrero de 2023


Prompt:
Clause text:
The term of the Agreement shall be extended, with the Expiration Date listed in Exhibit B being amended to be November 30, 2017.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Terms


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Ontario (Ministry of the Environment and Climate
    Change) v. Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 461

DATE: 20180515

DOCKET: M48649

Trotter J.A. (Motions Judge)

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario
    (Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change)

Respondent

and

Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc., 1367229
    Ontario Inc., Shay Ben-Moshe and Valery Belahov

Applicants

Leo Adler, for the applicants

Nicholas Adamson and Justin Jacob, for the respondent

Heard: April 26, 2018

Trotter J.A.:

A.

introduction

[1]

On August 10, 2008, a series of explosions rocked the north end of
    Toronto. They occurred at a propane gas facility operated by Sunrise Propane
    Energy Group Inc. (Sunrise).
[1]
A Sunrise employee, Parminder Singh Saini, was killed. The blasts caused
    structural damage to many surrounding buildings. Residents within a 1.6-kilometre
    radius of the facility were evacuated to enable a major environmental clean-up.

[2]

The applicants were charged under ss. 186(1), 186(2), and 194(2) of the
Environmental
    Protection Act
, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19 (
EPA
) for discharging
    contaminants into the environment (in violation of s. 14) and failing to comply
    with lawful orders issued to address the clean-up. They were also charged under
    ss. 25(2)(a) and (h) of the
Occupational Health and Safety Act
, R.S.O.
    1990, c. O.1 (
OHSA
) for failing to properly train

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Ontario (Ministry of the Environment and Climate
    Change) v. Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc., 2018 ONCA 461

DATE: 20180515

DOCKET: M48649

Trotter J.A. (Motions Judge)

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario
    (Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change)

Respondent

and

Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc., 1367229
    Ontario Inc., Shay Ben-Moshe and Valery Belahov

Applicants

Leo Adler, for the applicants

Nicholas Adamson and Justin Jacob, for the respondent

Heard: April 26, 2018

Trotter J.A.:

A.

introduction

[1]

On August 10, 2008, a series of explosions rocked the north end of
    Toronto. They occurred at a propane gas facility operated by Sunrise Propane
    Energy Group Inc. (Sunrise).
[1]
A Sunrise employee, Parminder Singh Saini, was killed. The blasts caused
    structural damage to many surrounding buildings. Residents within a 1.6-kilometre
    radius of the facility were evacuated to enable a major environmental clean-up.

[2]

The applicants were charged under ss. 186(1), 186(2), and 194(2) of the
Environmental
    Protection Act
, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19 (
EPA
) for discharging
    contaminants into the environment (in violation of s. 14) and failing to comply
    with lawful orders issued to address the clean-up. They were also charged under
    ss. 25(2)(a) and (h) of the
Occupational Health and Safety Act
, R.S.O.
    1990, c. O.1 (
OHSA
) for failing to properly train and ensure the
    safety of its employees.

[3]

After a 14-day trial, the applicants were convicted of nine provincial
    offences. Substantial fines were imposed. Appeals of both the convictions and
    sentences were dismissed.

[4]

The applicants seek to invoke the jurisdiction of this court to review
    their convictions and sentences.
[2]
However, they must first seek leave to appeal. Leave to appeal to this court in
    the provincial offences context is only permitted on questions of law that are
    essential in the public


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force or effect whatsoever as of the earlier of (a) such date and time as the Merger Agreement shall have been validly terminated pursuant to the terms of Article VII thereof or (b) the Effective Time (the “ Expiration Date ”); provided, however, that (i) Section 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement, and (ii) the termination of this Agreement shall not relieve Stockholder from any liability for any inaccuracy in or breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement prior to such termination.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Terminations


Prompt:
Clause text:
(o) Keep all property useful and necessary in its business in good working order and condition, ordinary wear and tear and casualty and condemnation excepted and (b) maintain with financially sound and reputable insurance companies or insurance associations insurance on all its material property in at least such amounts and against at least such risks (but including in any event public liability, product liability and business interruption) as are customarily carried in the same general area by businesses of the size and character of the business of the Group Members as reasonably determined by the Borrowers.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Insurances


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
R. v. MacDonald, 2012
    ONCA 244

DATE: 20120418

DOCKET: C50733

Laskin, Goudge and LaForme JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Jessiah MacDonald

Appellant

Michael Dineen, for the appellant

Randy Schwartz, for the respondent

Heard: September 14, 2011

On appeal from the conviction entered on April 16, 2009
    by Justice Paul French of the Ontario Court of Justice, sitting without a jury.

Laskin J.A.:

A.

introduction

[1]

Acting on an anonymous Crime Stoppers tip, the police obtained a warrant
    to search the residence where the appellant, Jessiah MacDonald, lived.  Police
    officers conducted the search in the middle of the night.  They found two
    loaded handguns.

[2]

The appellant was charged with illegal possession of the handguns,
    breach of recognizance and several related offences.  The sole issue at trial
    was whether the grounds to issue the warrant were sufficient.  The trial judge
    ruled that the grounds were sufficient, and that, therefore, the appellants
    right under s. 8 of the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
to be
    secure against unreasonable search or seizure had not been breached.

[3]

Following the trial judges ruling, the handguns were admitted into
    evidence, the appellant conceded the Crowns case, and the trial judge
    convicted him of the offences as charged.  The appellant was sentenced to two
    years less a day in prison plus

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
R. v. MacDonald, 2012
    ONCA 244

DATE: 20120418

DOCKET: C50733

Laskin, Goudge and LaForme JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Jessiah MacDonald

Appellant

Michael Dineen, for the appellant

Randy Schwartz, for the respondent

Heard: September 14, 2011

On appeal from the conviction entered on April 16, 2009
    by Justice Paul French of the Ontario Court of Justice, sitting without a jury.

Laskin J.A.:

A.

introduction

[1]

Acting on an anonymous Crime Stoppers tip, the police obtained a warrant
    to search the residence where the appellant, Jessiah MacDonald, lived.  Police
    officers conducted the search in the middle of the night.  They found two
    loaded handguns.

[2]

The appellant was charged with illegal possession of the handguns,
    breach of recognizance and several related offences.  The sole issue at trial
    was whether the grounds to issue the warrant were sufficient.  The trial judge
    ruled that the grounds were sufficient, and that, therefore, the appellants
    right under s. 8 of the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
to be
    secure against unreasonable search or seizure had not been breached.

[3]

Following the trial judges ruling, the handguns were admitted into
    evidence, the appellant conceded the Crowns case, and the trial judge
    convicted him of the offences as charged.  The appellant was sentenced to two
    years less a day in prison plus three years probation.  He appeals his
    convictions.

[4]

The appellant makes two submissions: (1) the trial judge erred in
    finding that there were sufficient grounds to issue the warrant.  In
    particular, the appellant argues that the police did not corroborate the
    anonymous tip in any meaning way, and that they exacerbated the
    unreasonableness of their search by conducting it in the middle of the night;
    (2) the handguns should not have been admitted into evidence under s. 24(2) of
    the
Charter
.

B.

the leg


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

CITATION:
Chegancas
v.
Lukezic
, 2011
          ONCA 391

DATE: 20110520

DOCKET: C53123

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Rosenberg, Lang and Watt JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Arcanjo

Chegancas

Plaintiff (Respondent)

and

Marija

Majda

Lukezic
, James Joseph
Lukezic
,
          Walker Hall Winery Ltd. and Walker Hall Holdings Ltd.

Defendants (Appellants)

James Joseph
Lukezic
, in person for
          the appellants

Mitchell Rose, for the respondent

Heard:
May 17, 2011

On appeal from the order of Justice
          Joseph W. Quinn of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 9, 2010.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The appellants appeal the
    motion judges decision dismissing their motion to set aside the default
    judgment that formed the foundation for the writ of possession.
[1]
The appellants also move for a stay of the
    execution of the writ of possession.

[2]

As the motion judge observed, the appellants offered the
    motion court no plausible explanation for their significant delay in moving
    to set aside the default judgment.  On
    appeal, the appellants material continues to offer no plausible
    explanation.  Nonetheless, in argument, Mr.
Lukezic
tried to advance information about an alleged
    forbearance agreement that was not contained in the record before the court on
    the hearing of the motion.

[3]

Mr.
Lukezic
acknowledges this is so,
    but characterizes his affidavit simply as a bit incomplete.

Response:
CITATION:
Chegancas
v.
Lukezic
, 2011
          ONCA 391

DATE: 20110520

DOCKET: C53123

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Rosenberg, Lang and Watt JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Arcanjo

Chegancas

Plaintiff (Respondent)

and

Marija

Majda

Lukezic
, James Joseph
Lukezic
,
          Walker Hall Winery Ltd. and Walker Hall Holdings Ltd.

Defendants (Appellants)

James Joseph
Lukezic
, in person for
          the appellants

Mitchell Rose, for the respondent

Heard:
May 17, 2011

On appeal from the order of Justice
          Joseph W. Quinn of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 9, 2010.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The appellants appeal the
    motion judges decision dismissing their motion to set aside the default
    judgment that formed the foundation for the writ of possession.
[1]
The appellants also move for a stay of the
    execution of the writ of possession.

[2]

As the motion judge observed, the appellants offered the
    motion court no plausible explanation for their significant delay in moving
    to set aside the default judgment.  On
    appeal, the appellants material continues to offer no plausible
    explanation.  Nonetheless, in argument, Mr.
Lukezic
tried to advance information about an alleged
    forbearance agreement that was not contained in the record before the court on
    the hearing of the motion.

[3]

Mr.
Lukezic
acknowledges this is so,
    but characterizes his affidavit simply as a bit incomplete.  Mr.
Lukezic
concedes that he understood the importance of bringing a motion for fresh
    evidence before this court if he wanted to introduce further evidence.  However, he says he was busy with other court
    matters and could not do so.   When asked
    about this, Mr.
Lukezic
suggested that an adjournment
    be granted so that he could expand on the evidence before this court.

[4]

In our view, even if such an adjournment were granted, the
    proposed fresh evidence would fail the
Palmer
test because the evidence was available at


Prompt:
Clause text:
The performance, construction and enforcement of this Agreement and the documents executed in connection with this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Maryland, notwithstanding any choice of law or conflicts of law rule that would otherwise dictate the application of the law of a different jurisdiction. The parties agree that any action or proceeding in respect of any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in a federal or state court located in the State of Maryland (the “ Chosen Court ”) and (i) hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consent to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Chosen Court for any actions, suits or proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) waive any objection to laying venue in any such action or proceeding in the Chosen Court and (iii) waive any objection that the Chosen Court are an inconvenient forum or lack jurisdiction.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Governing Laws


Prompt: What are the important criteria for choosing a password manager? Could you suggest me a couple open-source ones and compare them?

Response:
The important criteria for choosing a password manager include:

    Security: The password manager should have strong encryption and the ability to generate and store unique and complex passwords.

    Ease of use: The password manager should be user-friendly and easy to navigate.

    Compatibility: The password manager should be compatible with the devices and operating systems you use.

    Features: The password manager should offer features such as two-factor authentication, secure sharing, and password health checks.

    Cost: The cost of the password manager should be reasonable and should not be a burden on your budget.

Two popular open-source password managers are KeePass and Bitwarden.

KeePass is a free, open-source password manager that stores your passwords and other sensitive information in an encrypted database. It has a wide range of features, including support for multiple databases, two-factor authentication, and plugins. KeePass is available on Windows, Linux, and macOS.

Bitwarden is a free and open-source password manager that stores your passwords in an encrypted vault. It offers a range of features, including support for two-factor authentication, password health checks, and secure sharing. Bitwarden is available on all major platforms, including Windows, Linux, macOS, iOS, and Android.

When comparing the two, Bitwarden has more features and is more user-friendly, but KeePass is more customizable and can be a better choice for those who need more control over their password management.


Prompt: Generate me a poem about the sun behaving unusually and a group of friends exploding while they were buying some bread

Response:
The sun was acting strange,
A fiery ball, it seemed to change.
A group of friends, out for a treat,
Exploded while buying bread to eat.

It was a sight, both strange and bright,
As the sun shone with an unusual light.
The friends, they laughed, and had some fun,
Until they exploded, one by one.

It was a tragedy, a shocking scene,
As the sun continued to act obscene.
But the friends, they'll always be remembered,
For their laughter, and the bread they surrendered.