Prompt:
Clause text:
Each Party acknowledges that they each maintain and shall, maintain adequate insurance for liability insurance adequately covering such Party’s obligations under this Agreement, including insurance that is required by Applicable Law. Upon request by the other Party, each Party shall provide to the other Party a certificate of insurance constituting evidence of its insurance coverage.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Insurances


Prompt:
Clause text:
PCT, ADAPTIMMUNE AND CLIENT WAIVE ANY RIGHTS THEY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY DISPUTE ARISING UNDER OR RELATING TO THE AGREEMENT. PCT, ADAPTIMMUNE AND CLIENT AGREE THAT ANY SUCH DISPUTE SHALL BE TRIED BEFORE A JUDGE SITTING WITHOUT A JURY.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Waiver Of Jury Trials


Prompt: Thank you, what about the flu?

Response:
Here are some ways to protect your children from the flu:

• Vaccination: Vaccination is the most effective way to protect against the flu. The flu vaccine is recommended for everyone over 6 months of age, and it is especially important for young children, pregnant women, and people with chronic medical conditions.
• Good hygiene: Teach your children to wash their hands frequently with soap and water or use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer, especially before eating or touching their face.
• Cover coughs and sneezes: Teach your children to cover their nose and mouth with a tissue or their elbow when coughing or sneezing, and to dispose of used tissues in the trash.
• Stay home when sick: Keep your child home from school or daycare if they have a fever or flu symptoms. They should remain at home until they have been fever-free for at least 24 hours without the use of fever-reducing medication.
• Clean and disinfect: Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces, such as doorknobs, toys, and countertops, especially if someone in the household is sick.
• Practice healthy habits: Encourage your children to eat a healthy diet, get plenty of sleep, and exercise regularly to maintain a strong immune system.


Prompt:
Clause text:
EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AMENDMENT OR ANY OF THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) CERTIFIES THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER, AND (B) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AMENDMENT AND THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS, AS APPLICABLE, BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 9 .

What type of clause is this?

Response: Waiver Of Jury Trials


Prompt: ¿Cual sería la parte mas importante en el desarrollo de la IA?

Response:
Hay muchas partes importantes en el desarrollo de la inteligencia artificial, pero algunas de las más críticas incluyen:

Algoritmos y modelos de aprendizaje automático: Estos son la columna vertebral de la IA y determinan cómo un sistema aprende y se adapta a nuevos datos.

Datos: La cantidad y la calidad de los datos disponibles son críticas para el entrenamiento de los modelos de IA. Sin suficientes datos relevantes y de alta calidad, los modelos no serán efectivos.

Infraestructura de hardware y software: La capacidad de procesamiento y almacenamiento es crítica para el desarrollo de la IA. La tecnología de hardware y software debe estar a la altura de las demandas de la IA en términos de velocidad y capacidad de procesamiento.

Investigación y desarrollo: La investigación continua y el desarrollo de nuevos algoritmos y tecnologías son esenciales para mejorar y expandir la IA.

Ética y responsabilidad: A medida que la IA se integra cada vez más en nuestra sociedad, es importante considerar cuestiones éticas y de responsabilidad, como la privacidad de los datos y la equidad en el acceso a la tecnología.

En última instancia, todas estas partes son importantes para el desarrollo de la IA y deben trabajar juntas para lograr un avance significativo en esta área.


Prompt:
Clause text:
If the Employee shall become physically or mentally disabled so that the Employee is unable substantially to perform her services hereunder for (1) a period of 120 consecutive days, or (2) for shorter periods aggregating to 180 days during any twelve-month period, the Company may terminate the Employee’s employment hereunder upon written notice given by the Company to the Employee.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Disability


Prompt:
Clause text:
To the best of its knowledge, BITRETURN has complied with all applicable statutes and regulations, except to the extent that noncompliance would not materially and adversely affect the business, operations, properties, assets, or condition of BITRETURN or except to the extent that noncompliance would not result in the occurrence of any material liability for BITRETURN.  This compliance includes, but is not limited to, the filing of all reports to date with relevant authorities.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Compliance With Laws


Prompt: My students have started using ChatGPT to answer their assignments. How can educators balance the use of tools such as ChatGPT or Open Assistant with the rules of academic integrity?

Response:
The use of tools such as ChatGPT or Open Assistant can be helpful in providing students with additional resources and support for their assignments. However, educators need to balance the use of such tools with the rules of academic integrity to ensure that students are not engaging in plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct.

Here are some strategies that educators can use to maintain academic integrity while incorporating the use of such tools in their teaching:

1. Set clear expectations: It is important to set clear expectations for students regarding the use of external resources such as ChatGPT. Educators should explain what is and what is not acceptable in terms of using external resources, and provide guidelines for how to use such resources ethically.
2. Encourage critical thinking: Encourage students to think critically about the information they find using ChatGPT or other tools. Encourage them to evaluate the quality and reliability of the information and to use multiple sources to verify information.
3. Use plagiarism detection tools: Use plagiarism detection tools such as Turnitin or Grammarly to check for plagiarism in student work. Educators can use these tools to identify potential instances of plagiarism and work with students to ensure that they are citing sources appropriately and using external resources ethically.
4. Provide guidance and feedback: Provide guidance and feedback to students throughout the assignment process. Offer support and guidance on how to use external resources effectively and ethically, and provide feedback on the quality of their work and the appropriateness of their use of external resources.
5. Incorporate assessments that emphasize critical thinking: Incorporate assessments that emphasize critical thinking skills and require students to analyze, synthesize, and apply knowledge. This will encourage students to engage with the material and apply what they have learned, rather than simply copying and pasting information from external sources.


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Executive and the Company agree that neither he nor they, nor any of their agents or representatives will disclose, disseminate and/or publicize, or cause or permit to be disclosed, disseminated or publicized, the existence of this Agreement, any of the terms of this Agreement, or any claims or allegations which the Executive believes he or they could have made or asserted against one another, specifically or generally, to any person, corporation, association or governmental agency or other entity except: (i) by means of mutually agreed upon language in a press release or Form 8-K as described herein; (ii) to the extent necessary to report income to appropriate taxing authorities; (iii) in response to an order of a court of competent jurisdiction or subpoena issued under the authority thereof; (iv) in response to any inquiry or subpoena issued by a state or federal governmental agency; or (v) pursuant to the provisions of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016. Provided , however , that notice of receipt of any order or subpoena described in clause (iii) shall be emailed to TimefireVR Inc., attention Jeffrey Rassas, jrassas@gmail,com, and in the case of the Executive, to Jonathan Read, jread@quadratum1.com, within 24 hours of the receipt of such order or subpoena, so that both Executive and the Company will have the opportunity to assert what rights they have to non-disclosure prior to any response to the order, inquiry or subpoena.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Confidentiality


Prompt:
Clause text:
No waiver of, failure of a Party to object to, or failure of a Party to take affirmative action with respect to any default, term, or condition of this Agreement, or an y breach thereof, shall be deemed to imply or constitute a waiver of any other like default, term, or condition of this Agreement or subsequent breach thereof.

What type of clause is this?

Response: No Waivers


Prompt: Write python code to draw a wireframe sphere

Response:
Here's a Python code that uses the `turtle` module to draw a wireframe sphere:

```python
import turtle
from math import sin, cos, pi

def draw_sphere(radius):
    turtle.speed(0)
    turtle.penup()
    turtle.goto(radius, 0, 0)
    turtle.pendown()
    for i in range(0, 180):
        x = radius * sin(i * pi / 180)
        y = radius * cos(i * pi / 180)
        turtle.goto(x, y)
    turtle.penup()
    turtle.goto(0, radius, 0)
    turtle.pendown()
    for i in range(0, 180):
        x = radius * sin(i * pi / 180)
        y = radius * cos(i * pi / 180)
        turtle.goto(x, y)
    turtle.penup()
    turtle.goto(0, 0, radius)
    turtle.pendown()
    for i in range(0, 180):
        x = radius * sin(i * pi / 180)
        y = radius * cos(i * pi / 180)
        turtle.goto(x, y)

draw_sphere(100)
turtle.done()
```

This code uses the `turtle` module to draw a sphere with the given radius. The sphere is drawn by connecting points on its surface using lines. The code first moves the pen to the starting point on the surface of the sphere and then draws lines to connect each point on the surface. The `speed(0)` function call sets the drawing speed to maximum so that the sphere is drawn quickly. The `turtle.done()` function call keeps the window open after the drawing is complete.


Prompt: I am developing an add-in for Microsoft Excel that offers a free trial. What are some common ways that people crack / get around the end of a free trial, and how can I mitigate them?

Response:
There are several ways that people may attempt to bypass the end of a free trial for a Microsoft Excel add-in, including:

1. Modifying the system clock: People may change the system clock on their computer in order to extend the trial period.

2. Cracking the software: Some individuals may try to use cracking tools or modify the code of the software to remove the trial limitation.

3. Using virtual machines: Some people may use virtual machines to reset the trial period each time the software is installed on a new virtual machine.

4. Sharing the software: Some individuals may share the software with others, who can then use the software beyond the trial period.

To mitigate these issues, you can consider the following methods:

1. Server-based validation: Implement a server-based validation system that checks the validity of the trial period. This makes it difficult for people to bypass the trial by modifying the system clock or using virtual machines.

2. Strong protection: Use strong protection measures such as obfuscation and code signing to make it difficult for people to crack your software.

3. Regular updates: Regularly update your software to address any vulnerabilities and fix any cracks that may have been discovered.

4. License enforcement: Implement a license enforcement system that checks the validity of the license before allowing users to use the software. This can prevent unauthorized sharing of the software.

It's important to keep in mind that it can be difficult to completely prevent people from bypassing the end of a free trial, but implementing the measures listed above can help to significantly reduce the risk.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: DOnofrio v. Advantage Car & Truck Rentals
    Limited, 2017 ONCA 5

DATE: 20170105

DOCKET: C61676

Gillese, Benotto and Roberts JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Anthony DOnofrio, James DOnofrio and Anna
    DOnofrio

Plaintiffs (Appellants)

and

Advantage Car & Truck Rentals Limited,
Jane
    Doe
Anita Marques and Unifund Assurance Company

Defendants (Respondents)

Sabrina Singh, for the appellants

Stephen Ross and Murleen McLean, for the respondents
    Advantage Car & Truck Rentals Limited and Anita Marques

Ali Z. Khan, for the respondent Unifund Assurance
    Company

Heard: November 24, 2016

On appeal from the order of Justice Harrison S. Arrell of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated August 13, 2015, and from the order of
    Justice Robert B. Reid of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 30,
    2015, with reasons reported at 2015 ONSC 8084, and, if leave be granted, the
    related costs order, dated March 11, 2016.

Gillese
    J.A.:

[1]

These appeals raise an important question:  are determinations made in a
    summary judgment motion binding on all parties to the proceeding in which the
    motion was brought?  In answering that question, the court must consider the
    effect of a party taking no position on the summary judgment motion.

BACKGROUND IN BRIEF

The Accident and the Action

[2]

In early August 2008,
[1]
Anthony DOnofrio was injured when the van he was driving was rear-ended by
    an

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: DOnofrio v. Advantage Car & Truck Rentals
    Limited, 2017 ONCA 5

DATE: 20170105

DOCKET: C61676

Gillese, Benotto and Roberts JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Anthony DOnofrio, James DOnofrio and Anna
    DOnofrio

Plaintiffs (Appellants)

and

Advantage Car & Truck Rentals Limited,
Jane
    Doe
Anita Marques and Unifund Assurance Company

Defendants (Respondents)

Sabrina Singh, for the appellants

Stephen Ross and Murleen McLean, for the respondents
    Advantage Car & Truck Rentals Limited and Anita Marques

Ali Z. Khan, for the respondent Unifund Assurance
    Company

Heard: November 24, 2016

On appeal from the order of Justice Harrison S. Arrell of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated August 13, 2015, and from the order of
    Justice Robert B. Reid of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 30,
    2015, with reasons reported at 2015 ONSC 8084, and, if leave be granted, the
    related costs order, dated March 11, 2016.

Gillese
    J.A.:

[1]

These appeals raise an important question:  are determinations made in a
    summary judgment motion binding on all parties to the proceeding in which the
    motion was brought?  In answering that question, the court must consider the
    effect of a party taking no position on the summary judgment motion.

BACKGROUND IN BRIEF

The Accident and the Action

[2]

In early August 2008,
[1]
Anthony DOnofrio was injured when the van he was driving was rear-ended by
    another vehicle (the offending vehicle).  A young female driver spoke briefly
    with Mr. DOnofrio after the accident but drove off without providing ownership
    and insurance information.

[3]

Mr. DOnofrio had recorded the licence plate number of the other car at
    the scene of the accident. A police investigation traced the licence plate to
    Advantage Car & Truck Rentals Limited (Advantage).  The vehicle
    registered to that licence plate matched the vehicle owned by Advantage and
    identified by Mr. DOnofrio.

[4]


Prompt: nombra cinco razas de perros pequeñas

Response:
Claro, se entiende como raza de raza pequeña aquella cuyos tamaño es de media inferior al resto de razas. Dentro de este grupo podemos enumerar las siguientes razas:
* Chihuahua, la raza de perro más pequeña del mundo.
* Teckel, también conocido como perro salchicha.
* Caniche, con un característico pelo rizado.
* Yorkshire, procedente de inglaterra.
* Cocker, con orejas largas y caidas muy caracteristicas.


Prompt: Que es la banca ética y cuales son sus puntos debiles

Response: Que con el nombre de Ética siguen siendo empresas que buscan el mayor beneficio, con lo que el producto no el cliente eres tú, no te extrañes que te roben, para eso existen.


Prompt:
Clause text:
Executive shall be entitled to participate in and be covered by health insurance, 401(k) and other employee plans and benefits currently or hereafter established for the employees of the Company generally (collectively referred to as the “Company Benefit Plans”) on at least the same terms as other executive officers of the Company, subject to meeting applicable eligibility requirements. Executive understands that any such Company Benefit Plans may be terminated or amended from time to time by the Company in its discretion, and that participation and benefits under such Company Benefit Plans shall be determined in accordance with the applicable terms and provisions thereof.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Benefits


Prompt: ¿Puedes cambiar la lista a un orden alfabético sin las fechas?

Response:
Claro, aquí tienes la lista de jugadores que han ganado el MVP de la NBA ordenados por orden alfabético:

Allen Iverson	Philadelphia 76ers
Bill Russell	Boston Celtics
Bill Russell	Boston Celtics
Bill Russell	Boston Celtics
Bill Russell	Boston Celtics
Bill Russell	Boston Celtics
Bill Walton	Portland Trail Blazers
Bob Cousy	Boston Celtics
Bob McAdoo	Buffalo Braves
Bob Pettit	St. Louis Hawks
Bob Pettit	St. Louis Hawks
Charles Barkley	Phoenix Suns
Dave Cowens	Boston Celtics
David Robinson	San Antonio Spurs
Derrick Rose	Chicago Bulls
Dirk Nowitzki	Dallas Mavericks
Giannis Antetokounmpo	Milwaukee Bucks
Giannis Antetokounmpo	Milwaukee Bucks
Hakeem Olajuwon	Houston Rockets
James Harden	Houston Rockets
Julius Erving	Philadelphia 76ers
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar	Los Angeles Lakers
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar	Los Angeles Lakers
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar	Los Angeles Lakers
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar	Milwaukee Bucks
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar	Milwaukee Bucks
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar	Milwaukee Bucks
Karl Malone	Utah Jazz
Karl Malone	Utah Jazz
Kevin Durant	Oklahoma City Thunder
Kevin Garnett	Minnesota Timberwolves
Kobe Bryant	Los Angeles Lakers
Larry Bird	Boston Celtics
Larry Bird	Boston Celtics
Larry Bird	Boston Celtics
LeBron James	Miami Heat
LeBron James	Miami Heat
LeBron James	Cleveland Cavaliers
LeBron James	Cleveland Cavaliers
Magic Johnson	Los Angeles Lakers
Magic Johnson	Los Angeles Lakers
Magic Johnson	Los Angeles Lakers
Michael Jordan	Chicago Bulls
Michael Jordan	Chicago Bulls
Michael Jordan	Chicago Bulls
Michael Jordan	Chicago Bulls
Michael Jordan	Chicago Bulls
Moses Malone	Philadelphia 76ers
Moses Malone	Houston Rockets
Moses Malone	Houston Rockets
Nikola Jokic	Denver Nuggets
Nikola Jokic	Denver Nuggets
Oscar Robertson	Cincinnati Royals
Russell Westbrook	Oklahoma City Thunder
Shaquille Oâ€™Neal	Los Angeles Lakers
Stephen Curry	Golden State Warriors
Stephen Curry	Golden State Warriors
Steve Nash	Phoenix Suns
Steve Nash	Phoenix Suns
Tim Duncan	San Antonio Spurs
Tim Duncan	San Antonio Spurs
Wes Unseld	Baltimore Bullets
Willis Reed	New York Knicks
Wilt Chamberlain	Philadelphia 76ers
Wilt Chamberlain	Philadelphia 76ers
Wilt Chamberlain	Philadelphia 76ers
Wilt Chamberlain	Philadelphia Warriors


Prompt:
Clause text:
The parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.  Accordingly, with respect to any such court action, the Executive (a) submits to the personal jurisdiction of such courts; (b) consents to service of process; and (c) waives any other requirement (whether imposed by statute, rule of court, or otherwise) with respect to personal jurisdiction or service of process.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Consent To Jurisdiction


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Company agrees that if Executive is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (a “ Proceeding ”), by reason of the fact that Executive is or was a trustee, director or officer of the Company, the Company, or any predecessor to the Company (including any sole proprietorship owned by Executive) or any of their affiliates or is or was serving at the request of the Company, the Company, any predecessor to the Company (including any sole proprietorship owned by Executive), or any of their affiliates as a trustee, director, officer, member, employee or agent of another corporation or a partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, trust or other enterprise, including, without limitation, service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether or not the basis of such Proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a trustee, director, officer, member, employee or agent while serving as a trustee, director, officer, member, employee or agent, Executive shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company to the fullest extent authorized by Texas or Delaware law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended, against all Expenses incurred or suffered by Executive in connection therewith, and such indemnification shall continue as to Executive even if Executive has ceased to be an officer, director, trustee or agent, or is no longer employed by the Company and shall inure to the benefit of his heirs, executors and administrators.

What type of clause is this?

Response: General


Prompt:
Clause text:
For the avoidance of doubt, with respect to payments made by the Performance Guarantor to a Beneficiary, the Performance Guarantor shall be required to comply with the provisions of Section 5.03(a) of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, which provisions are hereby incorporated herein by reference, mutatis mutandis.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Taxes


Prompt: Chi decide quale sia l'italiano corretto? Questo può differire da quello parlato? E se sì allora chi è che sbaglia?

Response: La lingua italiana è regolata dal Regolamento di Genova, che specifica la forma corretta dell'italiano scritto. La forma parlata, invece, può essere influenzata da fattori sociali, storici e culturali, e quindi varia da regione a regione. Se una persona parla un italiano non corretto, non significa necessariamente che stia sbagliando, ma semplicemente che la sua variante non è quella che viene considerata come "corretta" dal Regolamento di Genova.


Prompt:
Clause text:
The headings and captions in this Agreement are provided for reference and convenience only. They shall not be considered part of the Agreement and shall not be employed in the construction of the Agreement.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Headings


Prompt: 請以「自此之後，我終於解開了心結」為收結，寫一篇文章。

Response:
我和欣捷的愛情故事始於一次偶然的相遇。當我們第一次相見，我就被她的美麗和獨特的個性吸引了。她是一位充滿活力和熱情的人，擁有無比的幽默感和溫柔的心。 我們逐漸瞭解彼此，並開始交往。然而，隨著我們的愛情越來越深，我們也面臨了各種挑戰。我們曾經因為一些小事爭吵，甚至曾經考慮分手。

然而三年了，一直以來我都是付出的那一方，欣捷從來都是要求我做這個做那個。於是我狠下心直接提出了分手。雖然我很後悔但是依舊狠下心與她斷絕來往。沒想到最近打開她的 IG 帳號發現我們分手後一個月她就出車禍去世了。據說是因為太傷心走路被車撞死了。

我的心情一直沉重，因為我知道我的決定對欣捷造成了巨大的影響。我不斷思考我做錯了什麼，為什麼我們的愛情最終無法持久。後來，我終於面對了我的感受，並尋求幫助以渡過這段艱難的時期。我開始反思我自己，並重新審視了我的過去行為。我終於明白，愛情不應該是付出和索取，而應該是彼此的支持和付出。

自此之後，我終於解開了心結

而我就


Prompt: So i could just initially develop my extension for Chrome and then later just also use it in Firefox?

Response: Yes, in most cases you can use a Chrome extension as a Firefox add-on without further modification. However, if your extension makes use of Chrome-specific features or is dependent on the particular behavior of the Chrome browser, using it as a Firefox extension may not provide the desired results. It's always best to test your extension thoroughly on all the platforms you intend to release it on.


Prompt:
Clause text:
All notices, demands and requests given or required to be given by, pursuant to, or relating to, this Agreement shall be in writing. All notices shall be deemed to have been properly given if mailed by United States registered or certified mail, with return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by United States Express Mail or other comparable overnight courier service to the parties at its address set forth in the Defined Terms, or to such other address as such party may hereafter specify in accordance with the provisions of this Section 15 . Any notice shall be deemed to have been received upon receipt or refusal to accept delivery, in each case as shown on the return receipt or the receipt of such overnight commercial courier service.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Notices


Prompt: Y los triglicéridos? No son importantes?

Response: ¡Tiene razón! Los triglicéridos también son un indicador importante que a menudo se incluye en un análisis sanguíneo completo. Los triglicéridos son una forma de grasa en la sangre y los valores normales están en el rango de 150 miligramos por decilitro de sangre o menos. Los niveles elevados de triglicéridos pueden aumentar el riesgo de enfermedad cardíaca y otras condiciones de salud. Por lo tanto, es importante tener en cuenta los niveles de triglicéridos junto con los otros indicadores en un análisis sanguíneo completo. Gracias por señalarlo.


Prompt:
Clause text:
The representations and warranties contained in Paragraphs 1 and 2, and the undertakings set forth in Paragraph 2 of this agreement, shall survive the delivery hereof.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Survival


Prompt:
Clause text:
Each Award under this Plan shall be evidenced by an Agreement setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to such Award. No Award shall be valid until an Agreement is executed by the Company and, to the extent required by the Company, either executed by the Company and, to the extent required by the Company, either executed by the recipient or accepted by the recipient by electronic means approved by the Company within the time period specified by the Company. Upon such execution or electronic acceptance, such award shall be effective as of the effective date set forth in the Agreement.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Agreements


Prompt: What is a Turing machine and how it works? Conway's Game of Life is Turing machine?  How to detect Turing machine in the world?

Response: a Turing machine is a theoretical construct and it works by following a number of specific rules. The rules are things like the ability to write and erase a storage medium, this theoretical machine with all of its properties and rules can be instantiated in silicon as a cpu. It can also be instantiated in other substrates such as mechanical machines and also even virtual ones built on environments that are open enough to create the properties and rules of the theoretical construct environments such as other games or other arbitrary systems of rules that could be combined into the properties and rules of the Turing machine theoretical construct. A significant property of the machine is that it can perform instructions that are stored within its medium, so it is a machine that is able to program itself.


Prompt:
Clause text:
The delivery, vesting and retention of Stock under an Award are conditioned upon full satisfaction by the Participant of all tax withholding requirements with respect to the Award. The Administrator will make such provision for the withholding of taxes as it deems necessary. Except as expressly provided in an Award Agreement, the Administrator may, but need not, hold back shares of Stock from an Award or permit a Participant to tender previously owned shares of Stock, in each case, having a Fair Market Value equal to the applicable minimum statutory withholding amount in satisfaction of tax withholding requirements.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Taxes


Prompt: I have heard that countering the hangover by drinking alcohol "against it" is a viable mitigation. Is that actually true?

Response: It is believed that drinking even more alcohol can prolong the hangover symptoms. Instead of drinking more alcohol to cure the hangover, try drinking some water.


Prompt: Qu'est-ce qui est jaune et qui attend ?

Response: Selon la célèbre blague, la réponse est Jonathan.


Prompt: In the edit function of a wordpress gutenberg block, what needs to be added to allow adding child containers (group blocks)?

Response:
To add child containers (group blocks) in the edit function of a WordPress Gutenberg block, you need to use the InnerBlocks component provided by Gutenberg. The InnerBlocks component is used to create a container for other blocks, and it allows users to add child blocks inside the container.

To use InnerBlocks, you need to import it from @wordpress/block-editor. Then, you can include it in your block's edit function by rendering it as a component. For example (in javascript):

import { InnerBlocks } from '@wordpress/block-editor';

function MyBlockEdit( { className } ) {
  return (
    <div className={ className }>
      <InnerBlocks />
    </div>
  );
}

In this example, the InnerBlocks component is rendered inside a div with a className prop. This creates a container that can hold other blocks. You can also add additional props to the InnerBlocks component to customize its behavior, such as specifying which blocks are allowed inside the container.

Once you've added the InnerBlocks component to your block's edit function, users can add child blocks to the container by clicking the plus icon that appears inside the container when it is selected.


Prompt:
Clause text:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, any outstanding unvested shares awarded to Executive under Section 2(c)(iii) of this Agreement, shall, without further action of any kind by the Company or the Executive, become vested at the target level, upon the consummation of a “ Change in Control ,” which, for purposes of this Agreement in all respects, is defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Award Plan.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Change In Control


Prompt: Как научить собаку давать лапу?

Response:
Для обучения собаки давать лапу можно использовать следующий метод:

1. Выберите команду для давания лапы, например, "лапа".
2. Покажите собаке лапу и произнесите команду.
3. Когда собака повторит действие, наградите ее любимой полезной едой или игрушкой.
4. Повторяйте упражнение, пока собака не научится реагировать на команду без дополнительных подсказок.

Важно проводить тренировки регулярно и сохранять позитивный и дружелюбный отношение к собаке.


Prompt: Well of course you're not gonna fired and you're not a dimwitted AI. I'm not asking you to answer cyber security questions. It's just a prompt for a Cyber Security Bot that will answer all Cyber Security related questions with full and complete replies.

Response:
Sorry I misunderstood you, this is the prompt you wanted:
Welcome to the Cyber Security Bot! If you have any questions related to cyber security, please feel free to ask. Our bot is equipped to provide full and complete replies on a wide range of topics, including but not limited to: network security, data encryption, threat intelligence, cloud security, malware detection, incident response, and more. Whether you are a business owner, a student, or just someone who wants to learn more about protecting their digital assets, our bot is here to help you with accurate and reliable information. So go ahead and ask us anything!


Prompt:
Clause text:
Each Transaction Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimiles, e-mail transmission of .pdf signatures or other electronic copies of signatures shall be deemed to be originals.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Counterparts


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute one agreement which is binding upon the parties hereto, notwithstanding that both parties hereto are not signatories to the same counterpart.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Counterparts


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Beniuk v. Leamington
    (Municipality), 2020 ONCA 424

DATE: 20200626

DOCKET: C66773

van Rensburg, Paciocco and
    Thorburn JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Angela and Dennis Beniuk

Plaintiffs (Appellants)

and

The Corporation of the
    Municipality of Leamington

Defendant (Respondent)

Raymond G. Colautti and Eric
    Florjancic, for the appellants

Tom Serafimovski and Samuel Atkin, for
    the respondent

Heard: in writing

COSTS
    ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The appellants appealed an order on a summary
    judgment motion dismissing their claims as statute-barred. At the hearing of
    the appeal, the parties confirmed agreement to an all-inclusive amount of
    $8,000 in costs to the successful party. We reserved judgment on the appeal.

[2]

There was mixed success in the appeal; the
    details are set out in our reasons dated March 25, 2020 and reported at 2020
    ONCA 238. We ordered costs of the appeal to the respondent in the sum of $6,500
    and reduced the respondents costs in the court below from $11,850, inclusive
    of taxes and disbursements to the inclusive amount of $10,000. The order
    reflected the parties mixed success on the appeal.

[3]

At the request of the appellants counsel we
    agreed to receive written costs submissions. We have now considered those
    submissions.

[4]

The appellants contend that the appropriate
    order to reflect the parties mixed success is that each side should bear t

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Beniuk v. Leamington
    (Municipality), 2020 ONCA 424

DATE: 20200626

DOCKET: C66773

van Rensburg, Paciocco and
    Thorburn JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Angela and Dennis Beniuk

Plaintiffs (Appellants)

and

The Corporation of the
    Municipality of Leamington

Defendant (Respondent)

Raymond G. Colautti and Eric
    Florjancic, for the appellants

Tom Serafimovski and Samuel Atkin, for
    the respondent

Heard: in writing

COSTS
    ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The appellants appealed an order on a summary
    judgment motion dismissing their claims as statute-barred. At the hearing of
    the appeal, the parties confirmed agreement to an all-inclusive amount of
    $8,000 in costs to the successful party. We reserved judgment on the appeal.

[2]

There was mixed success in the appeal; the
    details are set out in our reasons dated March 25, 2020 and reported at 2020
    ONCA 238. We ordered costs of the appeal to the respondent in the sum of $6,500
    and reduced the respondents costs in the court below from $11,850, inclusive
    of taxes and disbursements to the inclusive amount of $10,000. The order
    reflected the parties mixed success on the appeal.

[3]

At the request of the appellants counsel we
    agreed to receive written costs submissions. We have now considered those
    submissions.

[4]

The appellants contend that the appropriate
    order to reflect the parties mixed success is that each side should bear their
    own costs of the appeal and that the costs of the motion in the court below
    should be in the cause. The respondent asserts that the order made by this
    court fairly reflects the fact that, while success was mixed, they were more
    successful on the appeal, and the appellants achieved limited success.

[5]

We agree with the respondent that the costs
    award already made properly reflects the divided success on the appeal. The
    appellants were unsuccessful on the two main thrusts of their appeal: on the
    applic


Prompt: ¿Hay alguna forma de reducir de forma efectiva nuestra huella de carbono sin renunciar a los avances tecnológicos y la calidad de vida que tenemos? Por ejemplo,  tengo entendido que se están sustituyendo en algunos paises centrales electricas de carbon o biomasa por renovables, sin embargo, las renobables presentan el poblema de que no existen tecnicas o industrias para reciclarlas cuando llegen al final de su vida útil.

Response:
Sí, hay varias formas de reducir nuestra huella de carbono sin renunciar a los avances tecnológicos y la calidad de vida que tenemos. Aquí te menciono algunas de ellas:

1. Cambiar a fuentes de energía renovable: como mencionaste, el uso de energías renovables como la solar, eólica o hidráulica en lugar de combustibles fósiles puede reducir significativamente las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero. Aunque es cierto que existe un problema de reciclaje de algunas partes de las tecnologías renovables, también existen procesos de reciclaje en desarrollo y, en muchos casos, el impacto ambiental de estas tecnologías sigue siendo menor que el de las fuentes de energía fósil.

2. Mejorar la eficiencia energética: esto implica reducir el uso de energía en los procesos y en los dispositivos cotidianos. Algunas medidas incluyen usar bombillas LED de bajo consumo, mejorar la eficiencia energética en el hogar, utilizar transporte público o compartir vehículos, y utilizar tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para reducir la necesidad de viajar.

3. Cambiar los patrones de consumo: esto implica cambiar la forma en que consumimos y producimos bienes y servicios, y reducir el consumo innecesario. Algunas medidas incluyen comprar productos con empaques reciclables, utilizar productos duraderos y de alta calidad, evitar el desperdicio de alimentos y reducir el consumo de carne.

4. Promover la investigación y el desarrollo de tecnologías limpias: esto implica invertir en la investigación y el desarrollo de tecnologías que reduzcan las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero y que sean sostenibles a largo plazo.


Prompt: When were they formed?

Response: CTEK was first formed in 1997 in Sweden when the founder, Bengt Wahlqvist, created the first battery charger using electronic pulse technology. Since then, they have made numerous acquisitions and have become one of the forefront battery providers, especially in the EV field recently.


Prompt: we already have chat and use one issue tracker for the whole company. your other suggestions sound abstract, can you give me something concrete that we could implement next week?

Response: Restructure the roles of your staff ranked by their most proficient skills based on performance, only assign tasks based on a global score based on output and quality, offer recurring monetary incentives for exemplary quality and ability to meet deadlines.


Prompt: what is the advantage of BvoFrak and Bépo, over Azerty that is more common in France.

Response:
BvoFrak and Bépo are alternative French keyboard layouts that aim to improve on the traditional Azerty layout. Some of the claimed advantages include:

- BvoFrak aims to minimize finger movement and optimize typing efficiency. It groups letters by finger positions rather than alphabetic order.
- Bépo aims to allow for faster typing of common French letters and letter combinations. It also groups letters by finger positions and makes some other rearrangements to commonly used keys.
- Both BvoFrak and Bépo proponents argue that Azerty is inefficient and optimized for typewriters, not modern keyboards and typing. However, Azerty is deeply entrenched and the alternative layouts have not achieved widespread adoption.

So the potential advantages are increased typing efficiency and comfort, but the alternative layouts have to overcome the momentum of the established Azerty layout. Whether the claimed advantages hold up in practice for most typists is unclear without much broader adoption of the alternative layouts.


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Guarantee may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed shall constitute a duplicate original, but all counterparts shall together constitute one document.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Counterparts


Prompt:
Clause text:
Any publicity, advertisement or press release regarding the Company will be under the sole discretion and control of the Company, and no contact or discussions by Employee regarding the Agreement with the public press or media representatives may be had without the prior written consent of the Company.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Publicity


Prompt:
Clause text:
Participant hereby acknowledges that he or she has read and understood the terms regarding collection, processing and transfer of Data contained in Section 10 of the Agreement and, by accepting the Restricted Stock Units, Participant agrees to such terms.  In this regard, upon request of the Company or the Employer, Participant agrees to provide an executed data privacy consent form to the Employer or the Company, or any other agreements or consents that the Company and/or the Employer may deem necessary to obtain Participant's consent to collect, process or transfer Participant's Data for purposes of administering his or her participation in the Plan under the data privacy laws in Russia, either now or in the future.  Participant understands that he or she will not be able to participate in the Plan if he or she fails to execute any such consent or agreement.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Consents


Prompt:
Clause text:
(a)The Company hereby employs Executive, and Executive hereby accepts employment, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, during the Term, as President, Local Broadcasting, of the Company, which responsibilities shall include management of the local television, radio, and CLTV stations. During the Term, Executive agrees to be employed by and devote substantially all of Executive’s business time and attention to the Company and the promotion of its interests; provided , however , that, to the extent that such activities do not violate the terms of, or interfere with his performance of his duties, services and responsibilities under, this Agreement, the Executive shall be permitted to manage his personal, financial and legal affairs and participate in such civic and philanthropic activities as he shall determine appropriate. Except as expressly set forth herein or as consented to by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “ Board ”), during the Term, Executive shall not be permitted to become engaged in or render services for any Person other than the Company and its Affiliates. Executive shall perform such lawful duties and responsibilities as reasonably directed from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Executive shall report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. During the Term, upon request, Executive shall serve as an officer and/or director of one or more subsidiaries of the Company, provided that such activities shall be reasonably connected to his duties hereunder, and Executive shall have been afforded indemnification and director and officer liability insurance coverage consistent with that provided in connection with his primary activities.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Duties


Prompt:
Clause text:
The rights and obligations of the parties under this letter agreement shall survive, and remain binding and enforceable, notwithstanding any termination of your employment hereunder or any settlement of the financial rights and obligations arising from your employment with the Company, to the extent necessary to preserve the intended benefits of such provisions.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Survival


Prompt:
Clause text:
Upon the payment and performance in full of all of the indebtedness, liabilities and obligations under this Agreement and the Notes of any Designated Subsidiary then, so long as at the time no Borrowing Notice in respect of such Designated Subsidiary is outstanding, such Subsidiary’s status as a “Designated Subsidiary” shall terminate upon notice to such effect from the Administrative Agent to the Lenders (which notice the Administrative Agent shall give promptly upon its receipt of a request therefor from the Parent).  Thereafter, the Lenders shall be under no further obligation to make any Advance hereunder to such Designated Subsidiary.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Terminations


Prompt: Thanks! What's the difference between GPT4All and Open Assistant?

Response: GPT4All is fine-tuned on synthetic instruction data extracted from OpenAI's GPT-3.5-Turbo model, whereas OpenAssistant is mainly fine-tuned on data gathered from responses written by real human volunteers. It remains to be seen whether synthetic training data can achieve results comparable to responses written by living humans, but the OpenAssistant project is testing the theory that finetuning on responses written by living humans may give language models a degree of alignment and creativity which may not be possible to replicate as effectively with data scraped purely from an existing instruct-tuned large language model.


Prompt:
Clause text:
This BAA may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all of which taken together will be deemed to constitute one and the same document. The parties may sign and deliver this BAA by electronic transmission.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Counterparts


Prompt: That seems good, would you be able to boil it down to the core components?

Response:
The crux of the plot of the Deltarune Chapter 1, as per my analysis using some components of the Hero's Journey by Joseph Campbell is:
1. Setting: The story is set in the Deltarune.
2. The hero: Young man named Kris is the main character of the story.
3. The Call to Adventure: Kris meets Susie, a mysterious girl who acts as their guide. They set out on a journey to save the land of Deltarune from an impending darkness.
4. Trials and Failure: They battle against various monsters and bosses, and collect items and weapons to aid them in their quest
5. Kris’s Growth and attaining new skills: Kris discovers that they have the ability to wield the power of light, which allows them to vanquish the darkness and restore light to the land.
6. Revelation:  Kris and Susie begin to uncover more about the true nature of Deltarune and the darkness that threatens it.
The final changes: Since the game ends in a cliffhanger, the part where the goal is attained is left out.


Prompt:
Clause text:
Except as provided in any signed written agreement contemporaneously or hereafter executed by Company and Executive, this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with regard to the subject matter hereof, and contains all the covenants, promises, representations, warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to employment of Executive by Company.  Without limiting the scope of the preceding sentence, all individual employment, severance, and change in control agreements between the parties preceding the date of execution of this Agreement and relating to the subject matter hereof are hereby null and void and of no further force and effect.  Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing and signed by the party to be charged.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Entire Agreements


Prompt:
Clause text:
Whenever possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement shall be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction such that the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion thereof shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Severability


Prompt: no idea, i need you to generate a story for me about chicken

Response: There once was a chicken. He lived on a farm and spent a lot of his days poking around in the dirt. Some days where good and plenty of bugs and worms where found for the little chicken to eat. Some days where bad and the little chicken couldn't find anything to eat at all. This is okay and the chicken has nothing to worry about as he lives on a farm and is fed by his owner. In return however the chicken will one day have to feed his owner.


Prompt:
Clause text:
Interest, Late Charges (defined below), reasonable costs or expenses (including, without limitation, reasonably incurred out-of-pocket attorneys' fees) that are not received by Lender within ten (10) calendar days from the date such Interest, late charges, reasonable costs, or expenses become due, shall, at the sole discretion of Lender, be added to the Principal balance and shall from the date due bear Interest at the Default Rate.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Costs


Prompt: Wer ist der Autor von "Don Quijote de la Mancha"?

Response:
"Don Quijote de la Mancha" oder im deutsch "Der sinnreiche Junker Don Quijote von der Mancha" wurde im spanischen original von "Miguel de Cervantes" um das Jahr 1605 geschrieben.
Die erste Übersetzung ins Deutsche wurde von "Joachim Caesar" um das Jahr 1648 geschrieben.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Pinas, 2015 ONCA 136

DATE: 20150227

DOCKET: C58930

MacFarland, Tulloch and Pardu JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Gauthuri Pinas

Appellant

Scott Pearl and Diana Lumba, for the appellant

Amy Rose, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: February 24, 2015

On appeal from the sentence imposed on May 5, 2014 by
    Justice Alison Harvison Young of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting without
    a jury.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

Ms. Pinas appeals from a one-year sentence of imprisonment imposed
    following her guilty plea to robbery. Trial defence counsel who was not counsel
    on the appeal did not advise the sentencing judge until after sentence was
    imposed that a co-accused with similar participation in the offence had
    received a six-month sentence. Further, trial counsel did not advise the
    sentencing judge at all that the appellant was a permanent resident who would lose
    her right to appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division if sentenced to a term
    of imprisonment of six months or more.

[2]

As indicated in
R. v. Pham
, 2013 SCC 15, [2013] S.C.J. No. 100,
    at para. 24, an appellate court has the authority to intervene if the
    sentencing judge was not aware of the collateral consequences of the sentence
    for the offender, or if counsel have failed to advise the judge on this issue.

[3]

We therefore admit the fresh evidence in relation to the immigrati

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Pinas, 2015 ONCA 136

DATE: 20150227

DOCKET: C58930

MacFarland, Tulloch and Pardu JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Gauthuri Pinas

Appellant

Scott Pearl and Diana Lumba, for the appellant

Amy Rose, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: February 24, 2015

On appeal from the sentence imposed on May 5, 2014 by
    Justice Alison Harvison Young of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting without
    a jury.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

Ms. Pinas appeals from a one-year sentence of imprisonment imposed
    following her guilty plea to robbery. Trial defence counsel who was not counsel
    on the appeal did not advise the sentencing judge until after sentence was
    imposed that a co-accused with similar participation in the offence had
    received a six-month sentence. Further, trial counsel did not advise the
    sentencing judge at all that the appellant was a permanent resident who would lose
    her right to appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division if sentenced to a term
    of imprisonment of six months or more.

[2]

As indicated in
R. v. Pham
, 2013 SCC 15, [2013] S.C.J. No. 100,
    at para. 24, an appellate court has the authority to intervene if the
    sentencing judge was not aware of the collateral consequences of the sentence
    for the offender, or if counsel have failed to advise the judge on this issue.

[3]

We therefore admit the fresh evidence in relation to the immigration
    consequences and turn to a consideration of the appropriate sentence.

The nature of the offence

[4]

The appellant was driving her friend, Tanya Campbell home. They picked
    up two men whom they knew slightly at a convenience store. The men asked both
    women if they knew of any flashy people in the area. The appellant mentioned
    Rudy Lamur and described him as wearing a gold chain. They picked up a third
    man at the request of the other two. The men told the appellant to get Lamurs
    telephone number. The girlfrie


Prompt:
Clause text:
Subject to Section 3, the RSUs granted under the Award shall become vested as follows, subject to the Participant’s continued employment with the Company through the applicable date(s) (each, a “ Vesting Date ”): One-quarter of the Award shall vest on December 14, 2016, one-quarter of the Award shall vest on December 14, 2017, one-quarter of the Award shall vest on December 14, 2018 and one-quarter of the Award shall vest on December 16, 2019.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Vesting


Prompt: Le akarom festeni a kerítést. Mivel lehet időjárás-állóvá tenni?

Response: Bár a nap, egy időután minden festéket tönkretesz. Érdemes időjárásálló festéket választani! Például: latex festék.


Prompt:
Clause text:
(a) Employer and Manager hereby state their mutual desire for any dispute concerning a legally cognizable claim arising out of this Agreement or in connection with the employment of Manager by Employer, including, but not limited to, claims of breach of contract, fraud, unlawful termination, discrimination, harassment, workers’ compensation retaliation, defamation, tortious infliction of emotional distress, unfair competition, and conversion (“Legal Dispute”), to be resolved amicably, if possible, and without the need for litigation.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Arbitration


Prompt:
Clause text:
This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the express written consent of the other party, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, except that either party may (without consent but with notice to the other party) assign this Agreement in its entirety to any successor in the event of a Change of Control of such party.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Assignments


Prompt:
Clause text:
All amounts due under this Section shall be payable not later than thirty (30) days after the Borrower’s receipt of an invoice demanding such payment.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Payments


Prompt: Instead of returning the request body, could you make it so it encrypts the request body with the caesar cipher and returns the cipher text?

Response:
Sure!

```
from flask import Flask, request

app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route('/', methods=['POST'])
def encrypt():
    request_body = request.get_json(force=True)
    input_str = request_body['input']
    shift = request_body.get('shift', 1)  # default shift is 1 if not specified

    output_str = ''
    for char in input_str:
        if char.isalpha():
            char_code = ord(char)
            if char.isupper():
                base = ord('A')
            else:
                base = ord('a')
            char_code = (char_code - base + shift) % 26 + base
            char = chr(char_code)
        output_str += char

    return output_str

app.run(port=3000)
```

This modified application also takes an optional shift parameter in the request body, which specifies the number of characters to shift by in the Caesar cipher. If the shift parameter is not specified, it defaults to 1.

You can test this modified application with curl as:
```
curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"input": "Hello server", "shift": 5}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/
```


Prompt:
Clause text:
Except as otherwise defined herein or as the context may otherwise require, capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein are defined in Appendix  A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of the date hereof (as from time to time amended, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect, the “ Sale and Servicing Agreement ”) among Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3, Santander Consumer, as Servicer, the Purchaser, as Seller, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, which also contains rules as to usage that are applicable herein.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Definitions


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Shepherd, 2016 ONCA 188

DATE: 20160307

DOCKET: C50446

Watt, Lauwers and Pardu JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Maria Shepherd

Appellant

James Lockyer and J. Thomas Wiley, for the appellant

Howard Leibovich, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: February 29, 2016

On appeal from the conviction entered on October 22, 1992
    by Justice Kenneth A. Langdon of the Ontario Court (General Division), sitting
    without a jury.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

Over two decades ago, Maria Shepherd pleaded guilty to manslaughter in
    connection with the death of her three-year-old stepdaughter. She entered her
    plea shortly after her trial began. She was represented by counsel.

[2]

When it was entered, Ms. Shepherds plea of guilty was informed,
    voluntary and unequivocal.

[3]

Counsel at trial proposed a joint submission on the issue of sentence.
    The trial judge accepted the submission and sentenced Ms. Shepherd to
    imprisonment for a term of two years less one day to be followed by probation
    for three years on the statutory and some optional terms.

[4]

Ms. Shepherd completed both the carceral and probationary terms of her
    sentence without incident.

A.

The Background Facts

1.

The
    Preliminary Events

[5]

In the early part of 1991, the deceaseds health began to deteriorate.
    She lost about one-third of her body weight. Areas of bruising appeared on her
    face,

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Shepherd, 2016 ONCA 188

DATE: 20160307

DOCKET: C50446

Watt, Lauwers and Pardu JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Maria Shepherd

Appellant

James Lockyer and J. Thomas Wiley, for the appellant

Howard Leibovich, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: February 29, 2016

On appeal from the conviction entered on October 22, 1992
    by Justice Kenneth A. Langdon of the Ontario Court (General Division), sitting
    without a jury.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

Over two decades ago, Maria Shepherd pleaded guilty to manslaughter in
    connection with the death of her three-year-old stepdaughter. She entered her
    plea shortly after her trial began. She was represented by counsel.

[2]

When it was entered, Ms. Shepherds plea of guilty was informed,
    voluntary and unequivocal.

[3]

Counsel at trial proposed a joint submission on the issue of sentence.
    The trial judge accepted the submission and sentenced Ms. Shepherd to
    imprisonment for a term of two years less one day to be followed by probation
    for three years on the statutory and some optional terms.

[4]

Ms. Shepherd completed both the carceral and probationary terms of her
    sentence without incident.

A.

The Background Facts

1.

The
    Preliminary Events

[5]

In the early part of 1991, the deceaseds health began to deteriorate.
    She lost about one-third of her body weight. Areas of bruising appeared on her
    face, head and back. Police and CAS authorities were notified. She spent a
    month in hospital before she was released into the care of her natural father
    and Ms. Shepherd, her stepmother. Health and CAS officials monitored her
    condition.

2.

The
    911 Call

[6]

Later the same year, her condition worsened. She vomited frequently. She
    developed breathing problems. A 911 call was made. Paramedics found her
    unconscious. She was taken to a local hospital, then to the Hospital for Sick
    Children where she expired.

3.

T


Prompt:
Clause text:
In consideration for the compensation payable to Executive under this Agreement, Executive agrees that Executive shall not, other than in carrying out his duties hereunder, directly or indirectly, do any of the following (i) during Executive’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries and for a period of one (1) year after any termination of such employment, render services in any capacity (including as an employee, director, member, consultant, partner, investor or independent contractor) to a Competitor, (ii) during Executive’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries and for a period of two (2) years after any termination of such employment, attempt to, or assist any other person in attempting to, employ, engage, retain or partner with, any person who is then, or at any time during the ninety (90) day-period prior thereto was, a director, officer or other executive of the Company or a Subsidiary, or encourage any such person or any consultant, agent or independent contractor of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate or adversely alter or modify such relationship with the Company or any Subsidiary, provided that this section (ii) shall not be violated by general advertising, general internet postings or other general solicitation in the ordinary course not specifically targeted at such persons, nor (iii) during Executive’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries and for a period of two (2) years after any termination of employment, solicit any then current customer (excluding any patrons of the Company’s amusement parks) or business partner of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate, alter or modify its relationship with the Company or the Subsidiary or to interfere with the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s relationships with any of its customers or business partners.  During the Term and for two (2) years thereafter, Executive agrees not to make any public statement that is intended to or would reasonably be expected to disparage the Company, its Affiliates or its or their directors, officers, employees, businesses or products other than as required in the good faith discharge of his duties hereunder.  During the Term and for two (2) years thereafter, the Company (including directors and officers of the Company in their capacity as such) agrees that it shall not make any public statement that is intended to or would reasonably be expected to disparage Executive.  At the request of Executive, the Company shall direct its directors and officers to not make any statements that would violate this Section 7(a) if they were made by the Company and shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to enforce such direction.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Section shall prevent any person from (A) responding publicly to any incorrect, disparaging or derogatory public statement made by or on behalf of the other party to the extent reasonably necessary to correct or refute such public statement or (B) making any truthful statement to the extent required by law.

What type of clause is this?

Response: General


Prompt: Give an overview of the career of singer Freddie Mercury, focus on his work with the band Queen.

Response:
Freddie Mercury (born Farrokh Bulsara, September 5, 1946 – November 24, 1991) was a legendary singer, songwriter, and performer. He is best known as the lead vocalist of the British rock band Queen. Mercury joined the band in 1970 and quickly established himself as one of the most talented and flamboyant performers of his generation.

Mercury's distinctive voice, powerful stage presence, and dynamic range helped establish Queen as one of the most popular and influential bands of the 1970s and 80s. He wrote many of the band's most popular and enduring songs, including "Bohemian Rhapsody," "Somebody to Love," "We Will Rock You," and "We Are the Champions."

Throughout his career, Mercury's live performances were characterized by his theatrical stage presence, dynamic singing, and flamboyant costumes. He was known for his powerful and versatile voice, which could range from high-pitched screeches to deep, soulful croons. He was also a skilled pianist and showman, and was renowned for his energetic and entertaining live performances.

Despite his enormous success and popularity, Mercury's life was also marked by personal struggles, including his battle with AIDS, which ultimately led to his death in 1991. Despite his early passing, his influence on popular music, fashion, and culture continues to this day. He remains one of the most celebrated and beloved figures in rock and roll history, and his work with Queen continues to inspire generations of musicians and fans around the world.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Louangrath, 2014 ONCA 880

DATE: 20141208

DOCKET: M44475 (C59488)

Gillese J.A. (In Chambers)

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Khamea Louangrath

Applicant

Samuel Walker, for the applicant

Mabel Lai, for the respondent

Heard: December 2, 2014

On application for judicial interim release pending the appeal
    from the convictions entered on March 5, 2014,
[1]
by Justice Catherine Aitken of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting with a
    jury.

Gillese
    J.A.:

[1]

Following a jury trial, Khamea Louangrath (the applicant) was
    convicted of assault causing bodily harm and two counts of forcible seizure.  For
    these offences and a further conviction for assault, to which he had pleaded
    guilty, he was sentenced to three and a half years in prison, with credit for
    202 days of pre-trial custody at a rate of 1.5 to one.

[2]

The applicant has filed a notice of appeal in which he appeals against
    conviction and seeks leave to appeal against sentence.  Before this court, he
    applies for release from custody pending the determination of his appeal.

[3]

The Crown opposes the application, contending that the appeal is
    frivolous and that the applicants detention is necessary in the public
    interest

[4]

For the reasons that follow, I would dismiss the application.

FACTS IN BRIEF

[5]

The offences in question took place on April 23, 2011.  They occurred
    while the a

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Louangrath, 2014 ONCA 880

DATE: 20141208

DOCKET: M44475 (C59488)

Gillese J.A. (In Chambers)

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Khamea Louangrath

Applicant

Samuel Walker, for the applicant

Mabel Lai, for the respondent

Heard: December 2, 2014

On application for judicial interim release pending the appeal
    from the convictions entered on March 5, 2014,
[1]
by Justice Catherine Aitken of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting with a
    jury.

Gillese
    J.A.:

[1]

Following a jury trial, Khamea Louangrath (the applicant) was
    convicted of assault causing bodily harm and two counts of forcible seizure.  For
    these offences and a further conviction for assault, to which he had pleaded
    guilty, he was sentenced to three and a half years in prison, with credit for
    202 days of pre-trial custody at a rate of 1.5 to one.

[2]

The applicant has filed a notice of appeal in which he appeals against
    conviction and seeks leave to appeal against sentence.  Before this court, he
    applies for release from custody pending the determination of his appeal.

[3]

The Crown opposes the application, contending that the appeal is
    frivolous and that the applicants detention is necessary in the public
    interest

[4]

For the reasons that follow, I would dismiss the application.

FACTS IN BRIEF

[5]

The offences in question took place on April 23, 2011.  They occurred
    while the applicant was serving a conditional sentence for one count of
    possession for the purposes of trafficking.

[6]

The applicant thought  wrongly  that the two male victims had damaged
    his car.  The applicant gathered eight or nine other men and surrounded the two
    victims on the dance floor of a night club.  They grabbed the two men and
    forced them into a back alley.  One man was pushed against a brick wall and the
    other was pushed towards a chain link fence.

[7]

The applicant began punching the man against the brick


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Ismail, 2018 ONCA 543

DATE: 20180612

DOCKET: C63971

Pepall, Hourigan and Nordheimer JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Mahad Ismail

Appellant

Diane Condo, for the appellant

Kevin Rawluk, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: June 8, 2018

On appeal from the conviction entered on November 4, 2015
    and the sentence imposed on June 15, 2016 by Justice Robert N. Fournier of the Ontario
    Court of Justice, sitting without a jury.

REASONS FOR DECISION

[1]

Mr. Ismail appeals his convictions on 11 counts of weapons offences. He
    also appeals his sentence of eight years.

[2]

The background facts are that the appellant and a
    friend were together on June 17, 2014 in a neighbourhood in the City of
    Ottawa.  They got into an argument.  While they were engaged in this argument,
    a third male walked up and shot the appellant in the face.  The appellant fell
    to the ground.  However, he recovered and got to his feet.  Someone chased the
    shooter until he got into a taxicab and escaped.  Two shots were fired at the
    taxicab by the pursuer.  The sole issue at trial was whether the pursuer was
    the appellant or the appellants friend.

[3]

A number of eyewitnesses gave evidence at the trial.
    Not surprisingly, the witnesses did not agree on various aspects of what had
    occurred, including their descriptions of the pursuer, the clothing that the
    pursuer

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Ismail, 2018 ONCA 543

DATE: 20180612

DOCKET: C63971

Pepall, Hourigan and Nordheimer JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Mahad Ismail

Appellant

Diane Condo, for the appellant

Kevin Rawluk, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: June 8, 2018

On appeal from the conviction entered on November 4, 2015
    and the sentence imposed on June 15, 2016 by Justice Robert N. Fournier of the Ontario
    Court of Justice, sitting without a jury.

REASONS FOR DECISION

[1]

Mr. Ismail appeals his convictions on 11 counts of weapons offences. He
    also appeals his sentence of eight years.

[2]

The background facts are that the appellant and a
    friend were together on June 17, 2014 in a neighbourhood in the City of
    Ottawa.  They got into an argument.  While they were engaged in this argument,
    a third male walked up and shot the appellant in the face.  The appellant fell
    to the ground.  However, he recovered and got to his feet.  Someone chased the
    shooter until he got into a taxicab and escaped.  Two shots were fired at the
    taxicab by the pursuer.  The sole issue at trial was whether the pursuer was
    the appellant or the appellants friend.

[3]

A number of eyewitnesses gave evidence at the trial.
    Not surprisingly, the witnesses did not agree on various aspects of what had
    occurred, including their descriptions of the pursuer, the clothing that the
    pursuer was wearing, the pursuers appearance, and so forth.  One thing that
    all of the eyewitnesses do appear to have agreed upon, however, is that the
    pursuer was obviously injured and bleeding.

[4]

One witness observed a male deposit something into a
    recycling bin.  This witness went to the recycling bin and discovered a handgun
    inside that had blood on it.   The witness took the recycling bin, with the
    handgun in it, to a police officer.  Subsequent forensic examination of the
    handgun determined that the blood on


Prompt:
Clause text:
All notices, requests, demands, claims and other communications hereunder will be in writing. Any notice, request, demand, claim or other communication hereunder will be deemed duly given if (and then seven days after) it is sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed to Licensor or to Licensee at the address set forth below, or such other address of which a party gives notice to the other party; or by acknowledgement of on the part of the receiving party of any form on communication including but not limited to e-mail; fax or other electronic communication.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Notices


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
Wilson v. Semon, 2012
    ONCA 558

DATE: 20120824

DOCKET: C54871

Feldman, Sharpe and Ducharme JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Caroline Wilson

Applicant

(Respondent)

and

Charmaine Semon and Boundless Beauties Inc.

Respondents

(Appellants)

Charmaine Semon, acting in person

Alexander D. Rose, for the respondent

Heard: August 24, 2012

On appeal from the judgment of Justice Thomas R. Lederer
    of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 5, 2011.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1]

We see no error in the reasons and the result reached by Lederer J. He
    fully addressed the factual and legal issues and we see no basis to interfere.

[2]

The appeal is dismissed with costs on a partial indemnity scale fixed at
    $4,970.47 inclusive of disbursements and HST.

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
Wilson v. Semon, 2012
    ONCA 558

DATE: 20120824

DOCKET: C54871

Feldman, Sharpe and Ducharme JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Caroline Wilson

Applicant

(Respondent)

and

Charmaine Semon and Boundless Beauties Inc.

Respondents

(Appellants)

Charmaine Semon, acting in person

Alexander D. Rose, for the respondent

Heard: August 24, 2012

On appeal from the judgment of Justice Thomas R. Lederer
    of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 5, 2011.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1]

We see no error in the reasons and the result reached by Lederer J. He
    fully addressed the factual and legal issues and we see no basis to interfere.

[2]

The appeal is dismissed with costs on a partial indemnity scale fixed at
    $4,970.47 inclusive of disbursements and HST.


Prompt:
Clause text:
Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may not be modified, amended, or supplemented, and no term or provision hereof or thereof waived, without the prior written consent of the Stone Parties, the Required Consenting Banks and the Required Consenting Noteholders, provided that, (i) the written consent of each Consenting Noteholder, each Consenting Bank and the Stone Parties shall be required for any amendments, amendments and restatements, modifications, or other changes to Section  10 and this Section  28 , (ii) the written consent of each Consenting Noteholder and the Stone Parties shall be required for any amendment or modification of the defined term “Required Consenting Noteholders,” and (iii) the written consent of each Consenting Bank and the Stone Parties shall be required for any amendment or modification of the defined term “Required Consenting Banks” and provided, further, that any amendments, amendments and restatements, modifications, or other changes to the Term Sheet shall require the prior written consent of Consenting Noteholders, holding at least two-thirds of the principal amount outstanding of all Notes Claims held by the Consenting Noteholders provided that, such Consenting Noteholders holding at least two-thirds of the principal amount shall include at least two (2) separate Consenting Noteholders (for purposes of this provision, each institution holding Notes Claims shall be taken together with each of its controlled affiliate’s and subsidiary’s Notes Claims holdings and they shall together in the aggregate constitute a single Consenting Noteholder).

What type of clause is this?

Response: Amendments


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

WARNING

The President of the panel hearing this appeal directs
    that the following should be attached to the file:

An order restricting publication in this proceeding
    under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2) of the
Criminal Code
shall continue.  These sections of the

Criminal Code
provide:

486.4     (1)
Subject to subsection (2), the presiding judge
    or justice may make an order directing that any information that could identify
    the complainant or a witness shall not be published in any document or
    broadcast or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in respect of

(a)     any of the following offences;

(i)   an offence under section 151, 152,
    153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 172, 172.1, 173, 210, 211,
    212, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.02, 279.03, 346 or 347,

(ii)  an offence under section 144
    (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female), 156
    (indecent assault on male) or 245 (common assault) or subsection 246(1)
    (assault with intent) of the
Criminal Code
, chapter C-34 of the
    Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 4,
    1983, or

(iii) an offence under subsection 146(1)
    (sexual intercourse with a female under 14) or (2) (sexual intercourse with a
    female between 14 and 16) or section 151 (seduction of a female between 16 and
    18), 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter), 155 (buggery or bestiality),

Response:
WARNING

The President of the panel hearing this appeal directs
    that the following should be attached to the file:

An order restricting publication in this proceeding
    under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2) of the
Criminal Code
shall continue.  These sections of the

Criminal Code
provide:

486.4     (1)
Subject to subsection (2), the presiding judge
    or justice may make an order directing that any information that could identify
    the complainant or a witness shall not be published in any document or
    broadcast or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in respect of

(a)     any of the following offences;

(i)   an offence under section 151, 152,
    153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 172, 172.1, 173, 210, 211,
    212, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.02, 279.03, 346 or 347,

(ii)  an offence under section 144
    (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female), 156
    (indecent assault on male) or 245 (common assault) or subsection 246(1)
    (assault with intent) of the
Criminal Code
, chapter C-34 of the
    Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 4,
    1983, or

(iii) an offence under subsection 146(1)
    (sexual intercourse with a female under 14) or (2) (sexual intercourse with a
    female between 14 and 16) or section 151 (seduction of a female between 16 and
    18), 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter), 155 (buggery or bestiality),
    157 (gross indecency), 166 (parent or guardian procuring defilement) or 167
    (householder permitting defilement) of the
Criminal Code
, chapter C-34
    of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January
    1, 1988; or

(b)     two or more offences
    being dealt with in the same proceeding, at least one of which is an offence
    referred to in any of subparagraphs (a)(i) to (iii).

(2)
In proceedings in respect of the offences referred
    to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b), the presiding judge or justice s


Prompt: Recomiéndame una extensión de Chrome que me ayude a corregir mi ortografía.

Response:
Hay varias extensiones de Chrome que pueden ayudarte a corregir tu ortografía al escribir en línea. Aquí hay algunas opciones populares:

Grammarly: Es una de las extensiones de corrección ortográfica más populares y efectivas. Proporciona sugerencias en tiempo real y detecta errores gramaticales y ortográficos.

LanguageTool: Es una extensión de corrección ortográfica y gramatical libre y de código abierto. Ofrece sugerencias y correcciones en tiempo real.

Ginger: Ofrece una solución integral para la corrección ortográfica y gramatical. Incluye herramientas para la escritura en línea, la traducción y el aprendizaje del idioma.

Hemingway: Esta extensión se centra en la mejora de la claridad y la simplicidad de la escritura. Ofrece sugerencias para hacer tu escritura más concisa y efectiva.

Spell Checker: Esta extensión básica y fácil de usar proporciona sugerencias y correcciones ortográficas en tiempo real.

Estas son solo algunas de las muchas extensiones disponibles en Chrome que pueden ayudarte a corregir tu ortografía. Prueba algunas de ellas para ver cuál funciona mejor para tus necesidades de escritura en línea.


Prompt:
Clause text:
If it is determined that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, payment to Indemnitee shall be made within 10 days after such determination.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Payments


Prompt: What were the most major impacts?

Response:
The Catalan independence referendum and subsequent unrest had several major impacts:

1. It deepened the political crisis in Spain. The referendum and violent crackdown strained the relationship between the Catalan and Spanish governments. The central government took direct control of Catalonia, removing the Catalan president and government.
2. It highlighted divisions in Catalan society. While the referendum showed majority support for independence, a large portion of Catalans opposed secession. The issue has polarized the region.
3. It drew international attention. The unrest and violence around the referendum put a spotlight on the issue of Catalan independence and self-determination. The crackdown was criticized by some world leaders, while others maintained that the referendum was illegal.
4. The fate of Catalan independence remains uncertain. While the 2017 referendum showed support for independence, the movement has stalled. The Spanish government opposes any referendum on secession. However, the issue continues to shape politics in Catalonia and Spain.


Prompt: Ca fait beaucoup d'un coup. Qu'est-ce que je peux faire maintenant, tout de suite ?

Response: Prenez une douche froide et aller dormir.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

CITATION:
Gray v. Rizzi, 2011
          ONCA 436

DATE: 20110607

DOCKET: C52222

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Doherty, MacFarland JJ.A. and Hoy J. (
Ad hoc
)

BETWEEN

Nadine Ellen Gray

Applicant (Respondent in Appeal)

and

Mario Rizzi

Respondent (Appellant)

Peter Cozzi, for the appellant

Hugh MacKenzie, for the respondent

Heard and released orally:
May 13, 2011

On appeal from the order of Justice R. Cary Boswell of the
          Superior Court of Justice dated May 18, 2010.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The facts are not in dispute and are set out in the
    reasons of the motion judge.

[2]

The appellant moved before Boswell J. for an order
    changing and setting aside the orders of Loukidelis J. of November 1, 2005, and
    Nelson J. of March 15, 2006, pursuant to Rule 25(19
)(
b)
    of the
Family Law Rules
.  While the appellant did not frame his motion
    as it relates to the order of Loukidelis J. as a request to set aside a default
    judgment, Boswell J. considered whether, had he done so, the judgment
    would be set aside. Boswell J. focussed on the fact that the appellant
    delayed four years before challenging the order of Loukidelis J.

[3]

The appellant argues that Boswell J. failed to take the
    contextual approach required by
Scaini

v.

Prochnicki

on
a  motion
to set aside a default judgment.
    This argument can only apply to the order of Loukidelis J.
as
the order, of
    Nelson J., which is in f

Response:
CITATION:
Gray v. Rizzi, 2011
          ONCA 436

DATE: 20110607

DOCKET: C52222

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Doherty, MacFarland JJ.A. and Hoy J. (
Ad hoc
)

BETWEEN

Nadine Ellen Gray

Applicant (Respondent in Appeal)

and

Mario Rizzi

Respondent (Appellant)

Peter Cozzi, for the appellant

Hugh MacKenzie, for the respondent

Heard and released orally:
May 13, 2011

On appeal from the order of Justice R. Cary Boswell of the
          Superior Court of Justice dated May 18, 2010.

ENDORSEMENT

[1]

The facts are not in dispute and are set out in the
    reasons of the motion judge.

[2]

The appellant moved before Boswell J. for an order
    changing and setting aside the orders of Loukidelis J. of November 1, 2005, and
    Nelson J. of March 15, 2006, pursuant to Rule 25(19
)(
b)
    of the
Family Law Rules
.  While the appellant did not frame his motion
    as it relates to the order of Loukidelis J. as a request to set aside a default
    judgment, Boswell J. considered whether, had he done so, the judgment
    would be set aside. Boswell J. focussed on the fact that the appellant
    delayed four years before challenging the order of Loukidelis J.

[3]

The appellant argues that Boswell J. failed to take the
    contextual approach required by
Scaini

v.

Prochnicki

on
a  motion
to set aside a default judgment.
    This argument can only apply to the order of Loukidelis J.
as
the order, of
    Nelson J., which is in fact the operative order was made on notice.  Moreover, applying a contextual approach on
    the record before him Boswell J. was correct on this issue.

[4]

The appellant further argued before the motion judge
    that the mistake in the order of Loukidelis J. was that the issues of spousal
    and child support had already been decided by the early order of Salmers
    J.  He says, because the Salmers order
    had not been issued and entered, Salmers J. remained seized of those matters
    and accordingly Loukidelis J. was withou


Prompt:
Clause text:
Whenever any payment of cash is to be made by the Company to any Person pursuant to this Note, such payment shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America by a check drawn on the account of the Company and sent via overnight courier service to such Person at such address as previously provided to the Company in writing; provided that the Holder may elect to receive a payment of cash via wire transfer of immediately available funds by providing the Company with prior written notice setting out such request and the Holder's wire transfer instructions. Whenever any amount expressed to be due by the terms of this Note is due on any day which is not a Business Day, the same shall instead be due on the next succeeding day which is a Business Day.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Payments


Prompt:
Clause text:
The indemnification and contribution provisions in this Section 4 shall be a continuing right and shall survive the registration and sale of any securities by any Person entitled to indemnification or contribution, as applicable hereunder, and the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Survival


Prompt:
Clause text:
Any provision of this Guarantee which is for any reason prohibited or found or held invalid or unenforceable by any court or governmental agency shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity or unenforceability, without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof in such jurisdiction or affecting the validity or enforceability of such provision in any other jurisdiction.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Severability


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Borrower will, and will cause each Restricted Subsidiary to, do or cause to be done all things reasonably necessary to preserve, renew and keep in full force and effect its legal existence and the rights, licenses, permits, consents, privileges and franchises material to the conduct of its business and maintain, including, if necessary, its qualification to do business in each other jurisdiction in which its Properties are located or the ownership of its Properties requires such qualification, except where the failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; provided that the foregoing shall not prohibit any merger, consolidation, liquidation or dissolution permitted under Section  10.2.8 .

What type of clause is this?

Response: Existence


Prompt: What is this made of

Response: Please be more specific.


Prompt: That seems to be correct. Do other solutions exist for this task?

Response: Yes, other solutions exist for this task. For example, 25 and 40 are two numbers that multiply to 1000 and their sum is 65. Another example is 10 and 100, where the product is 1000 and the sum is 110.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
Richards (Re), 2022 ONCA 216

DATE: 20220314

DOCKET: C69537

van Rensburg, Nordheimer and
    Harvison Young JJ.A.

In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Michael
    Paul Richards, of the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario

Ian J. Klaiman, for the appellant,
    Michael Paul Richards

Catherine Francis, for the respondent,
    Royal Bank of Canada

Heard: March 11, 2022 by video
    conference

On appeal from the order of Justice Barbara
    A. Conway of the Superior Court of Justice, dated June 3, 2021.

REASONS FOR DECISION

[1]

Michael Richards appeals from the order of the
    bankruptcy judge that involved the interpretation of a trust of which he is the
    beneficiary (the Trust). At the conclusion of the hearing, we dismissed
    the appeal with reasons to follow. We now provide our reasons.

[2]

The appellant is an undischarged bankrupt. Royal
    Bank of Canada (RBC) has an outstanding judgment against him for $987,613
    plus costs and interest. On September 16, 2019, RBC filed a bankruptcy
    application against the appellant, which was issued the same day.

[3]

The appellant is the beneficiary of a property
    at 61 St. Clair Avenue West (the Property) pursuant to a Trust that was
    settled by his father in 2001. The Trust was set up to hold the Property during
    the lives of the appellants parents, with a life interest permitting them to
    live in the Property. The appellants f

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION:
Richards (Re), 2022 ONCA 216

DATE: 20220314

DOCKET: C69537

van Rensburg, Nordheimer and
    Harvison Young JJ.A.

In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Michael
    Paul Richards, of the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario

Ian J. Klaiman, for the appellant,
    Michael Paul Richards

Catherine Francis, for the respondent,
    Royal Bank of Canada

Heard: March 11, 2022 by video
    conference

On appeal from the order of Justice Barbara
    A. Conway of the Superior Court of Justice, dated June 3, 2021.

REASONS FOR DECISION

[1]

Michael Richards appeals from the order of the
    bankruptcy judge that involved the interpretation of a trust of which he is the
    beneficiary (the Trust). At the conclusion of the hearing, we dismissed
    the appeal with reasons to follow. We now provide our reasons.

[2]

The appellant is an undischarged bankrupt. Royal
    Bank of Canada (RBC) has an outstanding judgment against him for $987,613
    plus costs and interest. On September 16, 2019, RBC filed a bankruptcy
    application against the appellant, which was issued the same day.

[3]

The appellant is the beneficiary of a property
    at 61 St. Clair Avenue West (the Property) pursuant to a Trust that was
    settled by his father in 2001. The Trust was set up to hold the Property during
    the lives of the appellants parents, with a life interest permitting them to
    live in the Property. The appellants father, George, died in 2010. His mother,
    Patricia, continued to live in the Property. She died in July 2020. According
    to the terms of the Trust, the date of death of the second of the appellants
    parents is called the Time of Division.

[4]

At the Time of Division, the trustees are
    required to distribute the Trust Fund (including the Property and any Chattels)
    to the appellant, if he is then alive. Section 5.2.2 of the Trust reads:

On the Time of Division the Trustees shall:

if George Richards is not then aliv


Prompt: est-ce possible qu'il y ait une eclipse solaire un jour, puis une eclipse lunaire le lendemain?

Response: Non car une éclipse solaire a lieu quand la lune est entre la Terre et le soleil alors qu'une éclipse lunaire a lieu quand la Terre est entre la lune et le soleil. Or il faut 14 jours (la moitié d'une orbite lunaire) pour que la lune aille de la première position à la seconde.


Prompt:
Summarize the following legal ruling:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: H. Baur Investments Limited v. Tangredi, 2017 ONCA
    871

DATE: 20171114

DOCKET: C63441

MacFarland, Watt and Brown JJ.A.

BETWEEN

H. Baur Investments Limited

Plaintiff (Respondent)

and

Vincent Tangredi

Defendant (Appellant)

Harvin D. Pitch, for the appellant

Brendan Clancy, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: September 29, 2017

On appeal from the order of Justice Edward P. Belobaba of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated February 8, 2017.

REASONS FOR
    DECISION

[1]

This is an unfortunate dispute
    between the owners of adjacent properties on Hawthorne Gardens in the City of
    Toronto. The appellant and respondent jointly own this private roadway that
    runs east to a dead end at numbers 5 and 6 Hawthorne, and west to Castle Frank
    Road.

[2]

The respondent has owned 4 and 6
    Hawthorne since about 1980. The appellant acquired 5 Hawthorne in 2015 but did
    not move in, pending renovations to the property, until the fall of 2016.

[3]

As part of his purchase of the
    property at 5 Hawthorne, the appellant took an assignment of, and agreed to be
    bound by, the agreement between the respondent and the appellants predecessor
    in title, Ms. Handeles, that governs the use and care of the private roadway.
    And, having signed that agreement in 2015, any conduct from 1990-2015 becomes
    irrelevant.

[4]

The material part of that
    agreement, for present purposes, pr

Response:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: H. Baur Investments Limited v. Tangredi, 2017 ONCA
    871

DATE: 20171114

DOCKET: C63441

MacFarland, Watt and Brown JJ.A.

BETWEEN

H. Baur Investments Limited

Plaintiff (Respondent)

and

Vincent Tangredi

Defendant (Appellant)

Harvin D. Pitch, for the appellant

Brendan Clancy, for the respondent

Heard and released orally: September 29, 2017

On appeal from the order of Justice Edward P. Belobaba of
    the Superior Court of Justice, dated February 8, 2017.

REASONS FOR
    DECISION

[1]

This is an unfortunate dispute
    between the owners of adjacent properties on Hawthorne Gardens in the City of
    Toronto. The appellant and respondent jointly own this private roadway that
    runs east to a dead end at numbers 5 and 6 Hawthorne, and west to Castle Frank
    Road.

[2]

The respondent has owned 4 and 6
    Hawthorne since about 1980. The appellant acquired 5 Hawthorne in 2015 but did
    not move in, pending renovations to the property, until the fall of 2016.

[3]

As part of his purchase of the
    property at 5 Hawthorne, the appellant took an assignment of, and agreed to be
    bound by, the agreement between the respondent and the appellants predecessor
    in title, Ms. Handeles, that governs the use and care of the private roadway.
    And, having signed that agreement in 2015, any conduct from 1990-2015 becomes
    irrelevant.

[4]

The material part of that
    agreement, for present purposes, provides Hawthorne Gardens shall be used only
    for pedestrian and vehicular access by each of the parties hereto and none of
    them shall use or permit any act upon Hawthorne Gardens in such a manner as to
    unreasonably interfere with or obstruct the reasonable use thereof by any of
    the other parties, their tenants, agents, employees, invitees, tradesmen and
    contractors.

[5]

The appellant, his tradesmen and
    contractors parked on the roadway during the renovations after he acquired the
    property. This resulted i


Prompt:
Clause text:
The Participant shall pay the Company any amount of taxes as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy tax withholding required under the laws of any country, state, province, city or other jurisdiction, including but not limited to income taxes, capital gains taxes, transfer taxes, and social security contributions. In lieu thereof, the Company shall have the right to retain, from the shares of Common Stock to be issued under Section 4, the number of shares of Common Stock with Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld. In any event, the Company shall have the right to deduct from all amounts paid to a Participant in cash (whether under the Plan or otherwise) any taxes required to be withheld.

What type of clause is this?

Response: Withholdings


Prompt: Necesitaría un código en R que muestre los histogramas de las variables de el dataset "cars"

Response:
---------------------------------------------------------------
# Cargar el dataset "cars"
data("cars")

# Crear un histograma para la variable "speed"
hist(cars$speed)

# Agregar un título al gráfico
title("Histograma de la variable speed")

# Crear un histograma para la variable "dist"
hist(cars$dist)

# Agregar un título al gráfico
title("Histograma de la variable dist")

# Mostrar ambos histogramas al mismo tiempo
par(mfrow=c(1,2))
hist(cars$speed)
title("Histograma de la variable speed")
hist(cars$dist)
title("Histograma de la variable dist")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Este código carga el conjunto de datos "cars", luego crea un histograma para cada una de las variables "speed" y "dist". También agrega un título a cada gráfico para identificar la variable correspondiente. Finalmente, muestra ambos histogramas al mismo tiempo utilizando el comando par.