text:
wrong screenshot

The screenshot after step 5 in section Enable password writeback for SSPR is incorrect - the screenshot from the previous section is reused.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 115ae83a-95dd-5643-bc88-f5447ebb2b99
Version Independent ID: 7462ce84-0a9f-4bfd-7eba-c00928d77865
Content: Enable Azure Active Directory password writeback - Microsoft Entra
Content Source: articles/active-directory/authentication/tutorial-enable-sspr-writeback.md
Service: active-directory
Sub-service: authentication
GitHub Login: @Justinha
Microsoft Alias: justinha

@Suveges
Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate.

Hi @Justinha
Could you please review on this, update as appropriate.

@Suveges
I've delegated this to content author @Justinha, who will review it and offer their insightful opinions.

Thanks for raising this. It's fixed now. #please-close

authors: Justinha Naveenommi-MSFT RamanathanChinnappan-MSFT Suveges


text:
Is system-preferred MFA method applicable to SOVERIGN clouds as well?

Is system-preferred multifactor authentication methods applicable to sovereign clouds, such as Azure AD US Government or Azure AD China provided by 21Vianet?
This information is critical in order to understand user-experience changes and to prepare end-users and staff for these changes.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: f6278919-974b-c2e1-bccb-0bc513baa5d1
Version Independent ID: 43db176b-3732-61c1-e57b-7c22e0949826
Content: System-preferred multifactor authentication (MFA) - Microsoft Entra
Content Source: articles/active-directory/authentication/concept-system-preferred-multifactor-authentication.md
Service: active-directory
Sub-service: authentication
GitHub Login: @Justinha
Microsoft Alias: justinha

@ShahMoneyXL
Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate.

@ShahMoneyXL
I'm going to assign this to the document author so they can take a look at it accordingly

@Justinha
Could you Please review this and update as appropriate.

@ShahMoneyXL sorry for delay and thanks for raising this. I created an internal work item for SMEs to review and update the topic as needed. #please-close

source: gharchive/issue

repo: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs

license_type: permissive

license_source: github-api


text:
The same port can be used for public and private listeners (Preview feature).

[Enter feedback here]
Section: Frontend port
The same port can be used for public and private listeners (Preview feature).
--> Still in preview? When ETA expected?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 77782ee2-e389-8851-3061-02a8f70aeb41
Version Independent ID: ade812e5-f5a9-348a-a022-94c5966e87e7
Content: Azure Application Gateway listener configuration
Content Source: articles/application-gateway/configuration-listeners.md
Service: application-gateway
GitHub Login: @greg-lindsay
Microsoft Alias: greglin

@npigit
Thank you for the feedback. I have reached out to the team internally regarding this issue and will keep you posted.

@npigit
I got a response back from the team. The current timeline for this feature to GA is by September 2023 (This is not a fixed ETA and might change)
Hope this helps! Thank you!

@ChaitanyaNaykodi-MSFT 👍
Sure it helps! Is it currently in a public or private preview?

authors: ChaitanyaNaykodi-MSFT npigit


text:
Has Update SSH key on an existing AKS cluster (preview) feature  been deployed in China Azure?

Hello，
When testing the code in this document, the following error occurs:
_[root@newname ~]# az aks update --name myaks --resource-group aks --ssh-key-value .ssh/id_rsa.pub
The behavior of this command has been altered by the following extension: aks-preview
Updating the cluster with no ssh key set at creation is not supported
Could you please tell us whether the update SSH key on an existing AKS cluster (preview) feature mentioned in this document is currently available in Azure China?
Is there anything wrong with this code？
az aks update --name myAKSCluster --resource-group MyResourceGroup --ssh-key-value .ssh/id_rsa.pub
Looking forward your reply, thank you!
Best Regards，
Wendy

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 3b81a147-db1c-b92f-88d1-6dd0991a72fe
Version Independent ID: f5a2c949-498f-5848-d89c-031d1a757120
Content: Connect to Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster nodes - Azure Kubernetes Service
Content Source: articles/aks/node-access.md
Service: azure-kubernetes-service
GitHub Login: @MGoedtel
Microsoft Alias: magoedte

@wendiz-zhang
Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate.

@wendiz-zhang
To determine if the "update SSH key on an existing AKS cluster (preview)" feature is currently available in Azure China, I recommend checking the Azure China documentation or contacting Azure China support directly. They will be able to provide you with the most up-to-date information regarding feature availability.
Regarding the code you provided, there doesn't appear to be anything technically wrong with it. However, the error message you received suggests that updating the SSH key for an existing AKS cluster without setting it during creation is not supported. It's possible that the "update SSH key on an existing AKS cluster" feature requires the SSH key to be provided during the initial creation of the cluster.
To resolve the issue, you may need to create a new AKS cluster with the desired SSH key or explore alternative methods for updating the SSH key on an existing AKS cluster, such as using the Azure Portal or Azure CLI options specific to Azure China.


text:
Most of your documentation has broken

Hello,
I am looking at
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-functions/functions-bindings-service-bus-output.md
and I can see in the first lines the following
::: zone pivot="programming-language-javascript,programming-language-typescript" [!INCLUDE functions-nodejs-model-tabs-description] ::: zone-end ::: zone pivot="programming-language-python" Azure Functions supports two programming models for Python. The way that you define your bindings depends on your chosen programming model.
That I guess is not meant to be shown in that way.
I can put a list of the pages that are broken however it seems that everything I am trying to read has some problems.
Not only that but reading this:

Creating an issue
We prefer that you create documentation feedback issues using the Feedback link on the published article - the feedback control on the doc page creates an issue that contains all the article details so you can focus on the feedback part.
I can't see any feedback link nor anything that resembles something like that shown in the page (while it seems that there is the HTML for a feedback link).
Let me know if this is resolvable as I really need to read the docs.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 1752a37b-b40a-5613-3416-fd604b281dbc
Version Independent ID: f088004f-f80e-ba5c-e08e-c76ac395c809
Content: Azure Service Bus output bindings for Azure Functions
Content Source: articles/azure-functions/functions-bindings-service-bus-output.md
Service: azure-functions
GitHub Login: @ggailey777
Microsoft Alias: glenga

@antogg2004
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
I've delegated this to content author, who will review it and offer their insightful opinions.

Thanks @antogg2004 for letting us know about this. What you are describing is the page's markdown source code. There must have been a bad build that accidentally got published. The good news is I don't see this now, so the page must have gotten rebuilt. Please don't hesitate to let us know about these things in the future. #please-close.


text:
Terminology clarification

With the introduction of the Billing APIs, there are 2 new terms I found out, for which I cannot find clear description.
These are:
EnrollmentAccount
BIllingAccount
could you please clarify?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 4afec9fd-3771-8e44-149f-b2695abfd544
Version Independent ID: 1ff4d69d-179a-bc06-a516-9fb20722bcfd
Content: Governance in Azure
Content Source: articles/security/governance-in-azure.md
Service: security
GitHub Login: @unifycloud
Microsoft Alias: TomSh

@gogbg Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate.

@gogbg Please note that regarding Billing Account you can refer to this document to get details. Please let me know where you got reference of enrollment account so that I could further check on it.

@gogbg Please let me know where you got reference of enrollment account so that I could further check on it.

@MohitGargMSFT these are the links:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/programmatically-create-subscription?tabs=azure-powershell
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/grant-access-to-create-subscription?tabs=azure-powershell
Also there is a PowerShell cmdlet called: Get-AzureRmEnrollmentAccount

@gogbg Thank you for providing additional context.
@TomShinder Please help with more information regarding EnrollmentAccount.

This article has been retired.
#please-close

authors: MohitGargMSFT SaurabhSharma-MSFT TerryLanfear gogbg


text:
MSI authentication example doesnt work

The JSON from the template in the doc above for MSI looks identitcal to SQL Auth and the linked service wont connect.
{
"name": "AzureSqlDbLinkedService",
"properties": {
"type": "AzureSqlDatabase",
"typeProperties": {
"connectionString": {
"type": "SecureString",
"value": "Server=tcp:<servername>.database.windows.net,1433;Database=<databasename>;Connection Timeout=30"
}
},
"connectVia": {
"referenceName": "<name of Integration Runtime>",
"type": "IntegrationRuntimeReference"
}
}
}
If you open up a working MSI SQL db linked service it looks like this:
{
"name": "AzureSqlDatabase1",
"type": "Microsoft.DataFactory/factories/linkedservices",
"properties": {
"type": "AzureSqlDatabase",
"typeProperties": {
"connectionString": "Integrated Security=False;Encrypt=True;Connection Timeout=30;Data Source=xxxx;Initial Catalog=yyy"
}
}
}
Of course if you use Powershell this JSON wont work as it complains about connectionString not having string content.   :(
Whats the correct JSON for MSI auth SQL db linked services if you are using Powershell???

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 09dd1d03-ae28-c5a2-7c64-2f51675f6b09
Version Independent ID: dac74d68-2105-a029-1f49-d444c0a252f4
Content: Copy data to or from Azure SQL Database by using Data Factory
Content Source: articles/data-factory/connector-azure-sql-database.md
Service: data-factory
GitHub Login: @linda33wj
Microsoft Alias: jingwang

@demichalk Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

authors: BryanTrach-MSFT demichalk


text:
I am getting the following error when trying to login to Azure Subscription

Hello,
I am getting the following error when trying to login to the Azure Subscription in SSMS:
===================================
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. (mscorlib)

Program Location:
at System.RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethod(Object target, Object[] arguments, Signature sig, Boolean constructor)
at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.UnsafeInvokeInternal(Object obj, Object[] parameters, Object[] arguments)
at System.Delegate.DynamicInvokeImpl(Object[] args)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.InvokeMarshaledCallbackDo(ThreadMethodEntry tme)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.InvokeMarshaledCallbackHelper(Object obj)
at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.InvokeMarshaledCallback(ThreadMethodEntry tme)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.InvokeMarshaledCallbacks()
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.DebuggableCallback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)
at System.Windows.Forms.UnsafeNativeMethods.DispatchMessageW(MSG& msg)
at System.Windows.Forms.Application.ComponentManager.System.Windows.Forms.UnsafeNativeMethods.IMsoComponentManager.FPushMessageLoop(IntPtr dwComponentID, Int32 reason, Int32 pvLoopData)
at System.Windows.Forms.Application.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoopInner(Int32 reason, ApplicationContext context)
at System.Windows.Forms.Application.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoop(Int32 reason, ApplicationContext context)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.ActionHandlers.DialogBasedActionHandler.RunTaskFormThread(Object contextObject)
===================================
Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.
Parameter name: index (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Azure.UI)

Program Location:
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Azure.UI.CommonUserControl.authenticationWorker_RunWorkerCompleted(Object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
at System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker.OnRunWorkerCompleted(RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
at System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker.AsyncOperationCompleted(Object arg)

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: ddcad97f-02c6-4307-7ed8-85ba7ae23ecc
Version Independent ID: 51a5e20b-c221-ee05-cb44-a479bfcf1a00
Content: Always Encrypted: SQL Database - Azure Key Vault
Content Source: articles/sql-database/sql-database-always-encrypted-azure-key-vault.md
Service: sql-database
GitHub Login: @stevestein
Microsoft Alias: sstein

Hi @zaalion Thank you for your feedback. Could you link the URL of the documentation you were following? That way, we can pass your feedback to the appropriate content author. If your issue is not related to a document I will recommend you to post it in the forum like MSDN or StackOverflow since those are the most appropiate channels.

Hi Alberto, Sorry for missing that:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-always-encrypted-azure-key-vault

@zaalion I could not reproduce this issue this will require some deeper analysis. Can you please file a support request @ https://aka.ms/azsupt? If you do not have access to a support plan, please reach out @ AZCommunity@microsoft.com with a link to this Doc/Issue as well as your subscription ID and we can help get the support ticket opened for this issue.

@stevestein while going over this doc I found a couple things that need to be updated. Like the images or screenshots from the portal, there are a number of things that look very different like in the section create a blank database the image doesn't show the field where you have to add a server name.
Also it would be great to mention that the resource group name you create in the power shell script is the one you later will have to choose in the portal blade for creating a SQL database. Thanks :)

@zaalion , @Alberto-Vega-MSFT - thanks for the feedback! A work item (1348368) has been created to address the issues pointed out above.
#please-close

authors: Alberto-Vega-MSFT stevestein zaalion


text:
Only TTS has Python example.STT no have，Use REST API

@SingeCore commented on Wed Nov 21 2018
In STT, I only saw TTS Python example on GitHub, no STT example, when I wrote REST API STT code with python, there were many problems URI did not respond. I asked engineers to give an example. Thank you!

Hi team,
I'm moving this here since the user is requesting more examples
best

Hello, @SingeCore

We truly appreciate your comment and we strive to improve your experience in docs.microsoft.com. However, we need more information in order be able to address your feedback. Can you please provide the URL you are referring to?

Kind regards,
Microsoft DOCS International Team

@SingeCore when ready, please share the link requested and we can continue.

Thank you. I've debugged it myself.

authors: CeciAc MicahMcKittrick-MSFT SingeCore


text:
Log Analytics appendix

Is there a KEY dictionary somewhere that describes the schema for the metrics available in Log Analytics?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 82c1f2f2-da35-02b0-b59d-1e1f4d982904
Version Independent ID: f27d9109-3172-7425-d201-82146d9216c2
Content: Analyze Log Analytics data in Azure Monitor
Content Source: articles/log-analytics/log-analytics-queries.md
Service: log-analytics
GitHub Login: @bwren
Microsoft Alias: bwren

@Placid7
Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

@Placid7 take a look here:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/monitoring-and-diagnostics/monitoring-diagnostic-logs-schema


text:
kristinabend47@gmail.com

Yfhchcgxgfdg

Document details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 144afccf-4ab9-bb34-957d-e86d3732d688
Version Independent ID: 863b80ff-f60a-e727-dc12-0d6aba937df6
Content: Azure Monitor overview
Content Source: articles/azure-monitor/overview.md
Service: azure-monitor
GitHub Login: @bwren
Microsoft Alias: bwren

@AsdfrGasd Hi, please provide more information about your issue. Thank you.

Due to the lack of actionable information in this issue we are going to close it out.
@MicrosoftDocs/azure-cxp-triage #please-close

authors: AsdfrGasd YutongTie-MSFT mrbullwinkle


text:
Best effort basis?

When you mention that the Event Grid does it on a best effort basis, it only means about the timeline of retries and not about the actual retries (as in these retries do happen), right?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 92671e7c-03e5-591d-7fe2-7c565220242a
Version Independent ID: 99bdee93-1a4d-d10c-8d90-a58a84bb6187
Content: Azure Event Grid delivery and retry
Content Source: articles/event-grid/delivery-and-retry.md
Service: event-grid
GitHub Login: @spelluru
Microsoft Alias: spelluru

@blueelvis Thanks for reaching out. We will review and update as appropriate.

@blueelvis  Yes, it discuss about the timeline of retries.
Do let us know if you have any other questions.

@blueelvis  Just following up here... Hope my previous comment helps.

@DixitArora-MSFT - Thanks for the clarification! Is it possible to add this explicitly in the document as well?

@blueelvis In the documentation it is mentioned that event Grid retries delivery on the following schedule : 10 Seconds, 30 seconds ...
So just wanted to check what is the confusion regarding this .

@blueelvis Since we have not heard back from you we will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please tag me in your reply. We will gladly continue the discussion and we will reopen the issue

authors: DixitArora-MSFT blueelvis


text:
Any other serialization support other than JSON?

With REST + JSON as the basic, it is a good start. But I am wandering:
Is there any future roadmap supporting for serialization such as

Microsoft Bond
Apache Thrift
Protocol Buffer

And framework support at back-end such as:

gRPC
zeroMQ
etc.

Since most of the time, the machine learning models are hide behind some other services or works together with other models, with internal communication support might be more efficient and friendly for microservie development?

@gitathrun, Can you please share the link to the document which you are referring so that we can assign it to the correct team.

@gitathrun, Since,We haven't heard back from you.we will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please reopen it and we will gladly continue the discussion.

authors: YASWANTHM-MSFT gitathrun


text:
Why logging libraries are mentioned?

The doc is about dependencies, and the list of autocollected dependencies.
This consists of outgoing calls to communication libraries, storage clients, logging & metrics libraries, as well as incoming calls into application frameworks and servers.
The above statement is misleading as it talks about incoming calls, and logging & metric libraries. They are not dependency telemetry.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: c30ec91f-10cb-84ea-e325-f0c22692b8f3
Version Independent ID: eb395d70-bd17-18f0-2e9c-96dd7970762b
Content: Azure Application Insights - Dependency Auto-Collection
Content Source: articles/azure-monitor/app/auto-collect-dependencies.md
Service: application-insights
GitHub Login: @nikmd23
Microsoft Alias: nimolnar

@cijothomas Thank you for your feedback . We will have this reviewed by content authors and updated as needed.

@cijothomas Thanks for pointing that out! I have removed the text and raised a pull request. Changes should go live shortly.

There is a table as well with logging libraries content that should also be removed,
Logging libraries |  |
| ILogger | 1.1+ |	| ILogger | 1.1+ |
| System.Diagnostics.Trace | 4.5+ |	| System.Diagnostics.Trace | 4.5+ |
| nLog | 4.4.12+ |	| nLog | 4.4.12+ |
| log4net | 2.0.8+ on NetStandard  1.3, 2.0.6+ on .NET 4.5+ |	| log4net | 2.0.8+ on NetStandard  1.3, 2.0.6+ on .NET 4.5+ |

Sure @cijothomas. Raised another pull request. The changes should go live shortly.

authors: AmanGarg-MSFT cijothomas shashishailaj


text:
MFA Azure AD Account Lockout.

Seems this page is stale (Azure AD Lockout)? See MFA Blade, Account Lockout.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 9c7b90ca-a2b1-9cd8-9769-cd48c27f10ea
Version Independent ID: b8c29389-c435-b2f0-4186-1e9c47ab4f3e
Content: Preventing brute-force attacks using Azure AD smart lockout - Azure Active Directory
Content Source: articles/active-directory/authentication/howto-password-smart-lockout.md
Service: active-directory
Sub-service: authentication
GitHub Login: @MicrosoftGuyJFlo
Microsoft Alias: joflore

@MicrosoftGuyJFlo Thanks for the quick response. :+1:

There has been another change in this section. The Password Protection section has now been moved to Azure Active Directory > Security > Authentication Methods > Password Protection. May need a document update.

authors: KrishnaG-MSFT PatrickLownds pramitib


text:
Broken link to anomaly detector

The link (in this section https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-hubs/event-hubs-tutorial-visualize-anomalies#run-app-to-produce-test-event-data) to the anomaly detector app on github is broken.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 9f17a71d-7aaa-552c-e5f6-b86e9eea62ac
Version Independent ID: 8566f195-46f6-e2ef-372f-a6765d0aab90
Content: Tutorial: Visualize data anomalies in real-time events - Azure Event Hubs
Content Source: articles/event-hubs/event-hubs-tutorial-visualize-anomalies.md
Service: event-hubs
GitHub Login: @ShubhaVijayasarathy
Microsoft Alias: shvija

Should be: https://github.com/Azure/azure-event-hubs/tree/master/samples/DotNet/Microsoft.Azure.EventHubs/AnomalyDetector

@LouOtway Thanks for your contribution, I've addressed this issue in PR: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs-pr/pull/96776.
The changes should be live EOD or tomorrow. We will now close this issue. In future, if you see any minor bug fixes in the doc, feel free to click on the edit button and submit a PR to update. we love to take community contributions.

authors: CHEEKATLAPRADEEP-MSFT LouOtway


text:
Import a certificate from Key Vault: New version

When you upload a new certificate version in the Key Vault does this automatically reflect to App Services where you have imported the previous version? Or do you have to reimport?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: cc2ee874-df45-1de2-1b30-1fd75c7fd709
Version Independent ID: ee181722-8386-9842-407f-d0549012d2e9
Content: Add and manage SSL certificates - Azure App Service
Content Source: articles/app-service/configure-ssl-certificate.md
Service: app-service
GitHub Login: @cephalin
Microsoft Alias: cephalin

@mathiasbl Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

@mathiasbl Thanks for asking question! As its mentioned in this doc Once the import is final, subsequent operations will use the new policy (new versions).
You may also refer to below doc might be helpful:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/key-vault/about-keys-secrets-and-certificates#key-vault-certificates

@mathiasbl Since we didn't heard back from you we will close this out but if you feel you need more information please just let us know.

authors: SnehaAgrawal-MSFT mathiasbl


text:
Please document oauth2 Refresh token

In the navigation sub tree on the left which this page is a part of, we document id token, access token but there is no document for refresh token.  Please document more info about the refresh token in oauth 2:

What format are they in?  is this decodable by 3rd party application?
What is the guideline for developers using this refresh token?
Is there any recommended size for refresh token?  Developers may store refresh token in some location and need to pre allocate space for the refresh token
Does the refresh token size change?  if yes what factors affect the token size?

Azure AD B2C documents this refresh token but it's not detailed enough
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/tokens-overview
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 2471c08b-befe-8e1a-df08-f13e116c231e
Version Independent ID: 0d827d33-2906-6352-9398-13863def9354
Content: Microsoft identity platform access tokens reference
Content Source: articles/active-directory/develop/access-tokens.md
Service: active-directory
Sub-service: develop
GitHub Login: @rwike77
Microsoft Alias: ryanwi

@bachoang Thank you for your feedback, our team will further look into it and get back to you at the earliest. Thanks

@bachoang Thanks for reaching out. I have assigned the issue to the author of the document to add information about the refresh token.

Hey Bac - refresh tokens are just opaque strings per the OAuth2 spec (technically encrypted JWTs for now but that's immaterial to a 3rd party app).  RT sizes do change, without warning, and we can't make guarantees around it. Using the refresh token is also governed by the spec, but I like the suggestion that we collect our details on refresh token usage in another doc.  I'll look into adding one and moving the RT revocation material there too.

@hpsin - thanks Hirsch.  The problem is lacking documentation on this cause customer to make the wrong assumption about RT token format and size.  They assume it's a certain size so pre allocate memory based on what they see and this breaks their app when the size change.  I have already received 2 support cases on this issue for a big Enterprise customer.

@rwike77 please assign to me

#reassign:@hpsin

Is there now any proper documentation available to get the refreshed token?

@Divya-CreateBytes - getting an RT is documented in all of the protocol docs that involve an RT. Is there something in particular you need with respect to redeeming them for a new RT?

Hi,
Thanks for replying. I have got the way to refresh the token now.
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 00:51, Hirsch Singhal notifications@github.com
wrote:

@Divya-CreateBytes https://github.com/Divya-CreateBytes - getting an RT
is documented in all of the protocol docs that involve an RT. Is there
something in particular you need with respect to redeeming them for a new
RT?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/49205#issuecomment-631674629,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APAQUDXIEQZKVTPCAI2D4RDRSQUTFANCNFSM4K6FDWXA
.

--
Divya Yadav
M: +91-9024253342
E: divya.yadav@createbytes.com
ABL Workspaces, 6th floor, plot number, 44
Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122003
https://www.createbytes.com

Hi, Thanks for replying. I have got the way to refresh the token now.

Per author of this issue the problem has been resolved. Closing this one out. #please-close

authors: BharathNimmala-MSFT Divya-CreateBytes amanmcse bachoang hpsin mmacy rwike77


text:
Add this feature to the AuthorizationManagementClient in the C# SDK

This feature is missing in the C# SDK while being immensely important for back-end cross-subscription services. Please add it ASAP.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: f0decae5-1977-1db8-8b69-7e9a46919add
Version Independent ID: f319b342-2f2f-3d71-1beb-0a394517e4b4
Content
Content Source
Service: active-directory

@turbo Would be great if you can add this product feedback to https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory. This will allow the community to vote on it and for the product team to triage and add to their backlog.

authors: amanarneja turbo


text:
Error when run locally

The comments below were machine-translated
@roanbaga commented on Thu May 07 2020
When I ran it manually, it always asked me to install the Azure Functions Core (even though I had done so several times), and when I arrived at the command "func: hosts start" it says that it doesn't recognize the command "func". After I went a thousand laps I found that it only worked (on my Windows 10) when the path of the system was included in the system path the path where the "func", in my case: "C:\Users<user>\AppData\Roaming\npm". There it all worked, it didn't ask to install the Azure Functions Core again and uploaded the server.
They should include that in the manual. On the other hand, when you copy the URL, it doesn't include the queryparam ?name-xxxxx, which makes it just fail. I don't know why he doesn't, in the example he says he should.

Detalles del documento
⚠ No edite esta sección. Se requiere para la vinculación de problemas de docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub.

ID: 04c9d43d-5bd2-87c6-2ccf-0c65ef193760
Version Independent ID: 6bf46ebc-481f-e4ef-b269-99bf99434601
Content: Creación de la primera función en Azure mediante Visual Studio Code
Content Source: articles/azure-functions/functions-create-first-function-vs-code.md
GitHub Login: @olprod

@srvbpigh commented on Thu May 07 2020
Hello, @roanbaga
Thank you for your feedback.
We are actively reviewing your comments and will get back to you soon.
Kind regards,
Microsoft DOCS International Team

duplicate of #54331


text:
no data in custom event log

[Enter feedback here]
When running the PowerShell sample the call to Post-LogAnalyticsData returns a 200 / OK
In the LogAnalytics workspace, I see a table with the name as specified in $LogType with _CL added
any query I run returns 0 records . My timerange is  set to 7 days, I created the sample in the last hour...
How do  troubleshoot this further?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 1295e1b3-5aed-3aee-4331-8b81e7a7e544
Version Independent ID: 3c00a5ee-7093-1e8b-9004-8fed3f82960e
Content: Azure Monitor HTTP Data Collector API - Azure Monitor
Content Source: articles/azure-monitor/platform/data-collector-api.md
Service: azure-monitor
Sub-service: logs
GitHub Login: @bwren
Microsoft Alias: bwren

@paulvanw Thank you for your query, we will look into it and get back to you at the earliest.

Adding an extra datapoint: the c# sample works out of the box. and with my own payload as well.
so at least this shows my configuration of the configuration and query to retrieve the data through AI/kusto are working as advertised

@paulvanw Thanks again for bringing this to our notice. You were right the C# sample from the document was working and not the Power Shell script at this time. However , after closer look seems that the  $TimeStampField = "DateValue" being the issue. If we change that to $TimeStampField = ""  the powershell script works as well. Its the same configuration in C# sample as well.
Hope this information helps , requesting you to please try the above work around and see it works for you. I did raise a PR to update the script accordingly in the document  and it will be reviewed next week.
At this point it appears that there's no further edits or updates needed to the documentation. We will go ahead and close this issue, however if you have any further queries please tag us in your reply and will be happy to reopen the thread and continue the conversation. Thank you

authors: BharathNimmala-MSFT paulvanw


text:
Title is cutoff

The title of this article in the navigation bar is cut off ("Create images without an").

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: b989b0a6-e432-7dfe-bca7-5d869af7283d
Version Independent ID: 00c600c7-580a-569c-7871-f7947ad8d461
Content: Create Linux images without a provisioning agent - Azure Linux Virtual Machines
Content Source: articles/virtual-machines/linux/no-agent.md
Service: virtual-machines-linux
Sub-service: imaging
GitHub Login: @danielsollondon
Microsoft Alias: danis

@dcbrown16
Thanks for pointing this out.
I have assigned the issue to content author to check and update the document as appropriate.

@danielsollondon
Can you please check and update the document.

#reassign @DavidCBerry13

I fixed the title so it appears correctly.  #please-close


text:
Typo on page

Functions 1.x apps automatically have a reference the Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs NuGet package, version 2.x.
should be:
Functions 1.x apps automatically reference the Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs NuGet package, version 2.x.

or -
Functions 1.x apps automatically have a reference to the Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs NuGet package, version 2.x.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 0440205f-adcc-0fc5-3adb-db4dbe1d1292
Version Independent ID: 14ad1300-590c-8102-6887-366078e1882a
Content: Azure Service Bus bindings for Azure Functions
Content Source: articles/azure-functions/functions-bindings-service-bus.md
Service: azure-functions
GitHub Login: @craigshoemaker
Microsoft Alias: cshoe

@cicinelli Thank you for your feedback! We will review and update as appropriate.

@cicinelli Thanks for reporting this item! I have updated the doc and it will be published soon. We appreciate the feedback!


text:
Please clarify "Windows Settings details"

In the section "Windows Settings details" it is unclear in the first 2 paragraphs what is meant by "Other entries" and what are "Settings Group column"
If "Other entries" refers to the "Sync your settings" on/off switch called "Other Windows settings" it should say this instead, and otherwise clarify what is mean by "Other entries".
If "Settings Group column" refers to the first column in the table below, that column is called "Settings", not "Settings Group".  I just don't understand what is written to describe this table.
Finally in the table, there should be legend that defines what the terms "sync", "backup", and "sync backup" mean, and what some of the words under the Group column are capitalized or not - I assume capitalized means it is one of the "Sync your settings" on/off switches, but then there is both language and Language, but no "Language preferences".
As written it leaves a lot for me to assume an interpretation of.
Thanks

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 4459a0c8-0451-bbdf-3d2f-f62f46dc2240
Version Independent ID: 7ebbbee6-1bd2-de5a-aabf-978d12099f3f
Content: Windows 10 roaming settings reference - Azure Active Directory
Content Source: articles/active-directory/devices/enterprise-state-roaming-windows-settings-reference.md
Service: active-directory
Sub-service: devices
GitHub Login: @MicrosoftGuyJFlo
Microsoft Alias: joflore

@giterdn  Thanks for reaching out. We will investigate and update the thread accordingly.

@MicrosoftGuyJFlo  Could this be clarified ?

#please-close no response from product group

#please-close no response from product group

Personally, I would have re-sent the request before closing due to no response.  There isn't incentive to provide feedback to articles otherwise.

Personally, I would have re-sent the request before closing due to no response.  There isn't incentive to provide feedback to articles otherwise.

I have. I am sorry. I have followed up multiple times with the Product Group to no avail. If you want to email me I am happy to chat offline. Email is in my profile.

I have. I am sorry. I have followed up multiple times with the Product Group to no avail. If you want to email me I am happy to chat offline. Email is in my profile.

authors: MicrosoftGuyJFlo giterdn neeleshray-msft vipulsparsh


text:
Description for ServiceAdminOwnerUpn missing

In Step 3 of "Trigger automation to configure claims provider trust in Azure Stack", the credentials for changing the owner of the default subscription are not well defined. It should be added to the table at the top of the section with the other input parameters.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: fac2cea8-637a-a642-7d7b-015c294976dd
Version Independent ID: 37926dfc-778f-91ed-3f63-3782c3aa0a92
Content: Azure Stack datacenter integration - Identity
Content Source: articles/azure-stack/azure-stack-integrate-identity.md
Service: azure-stack
GitHub Login: @jeffgilb
Microsoft Alias: jeffgilb

@jgallucci32 Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate further and update the document as appropriate.

Thank you for this feedback @jgallucci32
I'll discuss with the team and make the appropriate changes the next time we update that article.
#please-close

I assume that the port and protocol requirements for Stamp AD FS -> Customer AD FS is HTTPS,  TCP 443?  You mention the Graph -> AD requirements, but this is missing.

authors: MicahMcKittrick-MSFT dmc-tech jeffgilb jgallucci32


text:
Document is so cumbersome. Split Managed Identity & Service principal as separate docs

[Enter feedback here]
It's tough to follow the documentation on Key vault with AKS since it has mixed up managed identity & Service Principal so heavily. Having separate documents for Managed vs Service Principal is better.
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: eee999c1-32dd-d014-40df-8027adee1258
Version Independent ID: 19a29c09-79f8-580a-841f-873e2801da56
Content: Integrate Azure Key Vault with Kubernetes
Content Source: articles/key-vault/general/key-vault-integrate-kubernetes.md
Service: key-vault
GitHub Login: @taytran0
Microsoft Alias: t-trtr

@pvmraghunandan Thank you for your feedback. We will take this up with the content authors to have the separation suggestion for this document and update the thread.

@pvmraghunandan We will share the feedback with the content team about this although they have tried to keep it separate within same article. Most users may want both at the option same place.

@taytran0  Would you like to add anything here ?

Hey @pvmraghunandan, thank you for your feedback. Unfortunately we cannot split this into two separate docs. We made a design decision to show both service principal and managed identity commands side by side so customers can pick the experience they prefer. We have gotten feedback before that it is difficult to dig through multiple docs to find the right commands. We have made some improvements and have fixed some issues in this doc, so I hope that helps! Please let us know if you have any additional feedback. I will archive this issue for now.

#please-close

@ShaneBala-keyvault  Doc looks much better. One quick question. Why should we assign Reader role in addition to Contributor Role? Also, the latest doc refers AAD Pod Identity instead of "VMAssignedIdentity". Is that the latest guidance?

authors: ShaneBala-keyvault pvmraghunandan shashishailaj vipulsparsh


text:
This example hard codes access keys into source code

The example in this page implements the worst-practice of hard coding access keys in source code.  Can this be updated to use managed identities?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: faff12d0-cc36-0867-a297-a8b59a863fdd
Version Independent ID: bbeb40cc-78e4-9c99-cdad-55f64a506c66
Content: Quickstart: Connect a Node.js MongoDB app to Azure Cosmos DB
Content Source: articles/cosmos-db/create-mongodb-nodejs.md
Service: cosmos-db
Sub-service: cosmosdb-mongo
GitHub Login: @markjbrown
Microsoft Alias: mjbrown

@jdthorpe Thanks for the feedback. We are investigating the issue and will update you shortly.

Thanks for your feedback.
This example is intended usage of Cosmos emulator with Mongo API in a MEAN app. This example is not intended to highlight best practices for identities. Additionally, as this is a local executable and not an Azure service, it makes no sense to use MSI's to access the emulator.
We do have an article that does talk about using managed identities that you can reference.
Thanks.
#please-close

authors: RohitMungi-MSFT jdthorpe markjbrown


text:
Typo

If you are running these commands on a computer that is not the AD FS primary federation server, run Set-MSOLAdfscontext -Computer , where is the internal FQDN name of the primary AD FS server. This cmdlet creates a context that connects you to AD FS
After "run Set-MSOLAdfscontext -Computer" , it needs to be "where 'Computer' is the internal FQDN name of the primary AD FS server.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 9cdb2903-e512-e053-f3f7-e73e40ca3806
Version Independent ID: 794d1072-6f4e-f174-bd2e-32a876779834
Content: Certificate renewal for Office 365 and Azure AD users
Content Source: articles/active-directory/connect/active-directory-aadconnect-o365-certs.md
Service: active-directory
GitHub Login: @billmath
Microsoft Alias: billmath

@ashrayvk Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

@ashrayvk Thanks for reporting! I have assigned the issue to the author to investigate and update as appropriate.

Thank you @ashrayvk  for catching this.  I have fixed this.  The issue was that the html code for greater than and less than were not being used in the markdown so it was dropping it when rendering.  It should be fixed tomorrow.  Thanks!
#please-close

@ashrayvk
We will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please reopen it and we will gladly continue the discussion.

authors: MicahMcKittrick-MSFT MohitGargMSFT ashrayvk billmath femsulu


text:
Azure Gateway VS 3rd part NVA's for VPN set up

I want to decide setting up VPN between my Azure Vnet to few of my on-premises small sites ,but we already have 3rd party NVA firewall (From azure Market place) so now customer wants to have VPN setup using NVA itself rather than Azure VPN gateway.Do you have any article which provides Pro's and Con's of setting VPN using 3rd party NVA's rather Azure VPN gateway.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 45d7ab31-fdf3-9b0f-1439-6a01fb257aab
Version Independent ID: af13a45f-3061-2f0e-7452-b52d700b4805
Content: VPN Gateway Overview: Create cross-premises VPN connections to Azure virtual networks
Content Source: articles/vpn-gateway/vpn-gateway-about-vpngateways.md
Service: vpn-gateway
GitHub Login: @cherylmc
Microsoft Alias: cherylmc

@kiranjshetty Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

@kiranjshetty I am not finding a Pro/Con document but I can provide you a reference architecture that allows for either a VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute to be implemented. Please let me know if there is something specific you need additional information about. Regards, Mike

But if I already have NVA that is capable of creating VPN then still  why do customers pay extra for Azure VPN gateway. Is there any specific feature that can't be achieved using NVA VPN than Azure VPN gateway..

@kiranjshetty Do you have specific throughput requirements or need to support a specific number of tunnels?
The specific instructions for setting up routing for an NVA can be found here: Route network traffic with a route table using the Azure portal
If you do not have a very specific requirement that cannot be met by the NVA's, that leaves price as the main differentiator.
I am including links to pricing so you may calculate and compare your specific cost analysis: Azure VPN Gateway Pricing
VPN Gateway Pricing Calculator


text:
I followed the steps but when i try to push the docker image it says access denied

[Enter feedback here]

Document details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 6afe8c14-efa4-31a6-9fd9-e68f2d878226
Version Independent ID: c67857a5-ee1b-3ed2-f281-dd62c4c4c6f3
Content: Kubernetes on Azure tutorial - Create a container registry - Azure Kubernetes Service
Content Source: articles/aks/tutorial-kubernetes-prepare-acr.md
Service: container-service
GitHub Login: @mlearned
Microsoft Alias: mlearned

Let us know if you need help with anything in regards to this document and we will reopen the issue. Thanks.

Thanks but I closed it very quickly. I left a > next to the acr name.
But thanks for your help
Paul
On Sat, 15 May 2021, 03:42 Karishma Tiwari - MSFT, @.***>
wrote:

Let us know if you need help with anything in regards to this document and
we will reopen the issue. Thanks.
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/75341#issuecomment-841587580,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWUECPTIBOPCGNWMY7GIB3TNXNSZANCNFSM4445KP2A
.


text:
How to fetch the parameters, passed to an activity function, in its function.json?

I am trying to pass some payload from my python orchestrator function to my python activity function. I need to fetch CosmosDB data using one of the parameters value. I am using CosmosDB input binding in my activity function which has sqlQuery field using that parameter. I want to know how can I pass that variable to my CosmosDB input binding?

@t-souravgoel Can you share the document that you are following for which you have observed the issue?

It is not an issue, its more of a query
I can pass parameters to me activity function and retrieve them in the main script, but how can I retrieve the same params in function.json file of my activity function?

Hello @t-souravgoel I see a similar issue has been discussed here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65231702/how-to-pass-multiple-parameters-to-azure-durable-activity-function
However, you may want to use Value Tuple as per https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-durable-extension/issues/152#issuecomment-367156971
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/tuples-in-python/
https://realpython.com/python-lists-tuples/
https://www.programiz.com/python-programming/tuple
We will now proceed to close this thread as this is not related to any document enhancement. Should you need further assistance, I would recommend you to leverage channels like : Stack Overflow, Microsoft QnA etc.


text:
Include multiple parameters in example UDF

Please include examples of multiple parameter functions.  It's easy to understand how to remove parameters, but when there's only one, it's not entirely clear how to add additional parameters and use them.
Having additional alternative examples wouldn't hurt either.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 69fdf07d-1218-b9c9-159b-ecba62ba3f89
Version Independent ID: 8902f5c5-78c8-a3c8-b0e2-75179919c7b6
Content: User-defined functions - Scala - Azure Databricks - Workspace
Content Source: databricks/spark/latest/spark-sql/udf-scala.md
Service: azure-databricks
GitHub Login: @mssaperla
Microsoft Alias: saperla

@CMoltedo  Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to evaluate and add the above details.

Thanks for your dedication to our documentation. Unfortunately, we have been unable to address your issue and apologize for the delayed response. We are closing this issue, but if you feel that it's still a concern, please let us know directly at doc-feedback@databricks.com.
#please-close

#please-close

authors: CHEEKATLAPRADEEP-MSFT CMoltedo JasonWHowell kateglee-db


text:
Inconsistent usage of Or, And, and ","

This article is not consistent in how it outlines whether role requirements, sometimes using OR, sometimes using Commas, sometimes using a "/", and sometimes using + (for AND).
It is confusing customers whether "/" and "," mean "OR" or whether they mean "AND".  Can we find a way to be more clear when we mean OR and AND?
Eg
Review Pipeline Runs uses a "/" which i believe represents OR
Review pipeline runs | Synapse Artifact Publisher/Synapse Contributor
While "List and open any published SQL script" uses "," which I believe represents OR
Synapse Artifact User, Artifact Publisher, Synapse Contributor
Feedback from customers is that this is confusing.  Given the importance of the security model in a production environment it is key that this document is very clear and straightforward.  Could we consider being consistent with OR and AND to drive clarity in the role requirements?

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: cee8bd88-9e50-8192-60c0-70d40e36ca75
Version Independent ID: a75ec158-91e6-fbd9-006d-3cbd6a404561
Content: Understand the roles required to perform common tasks in Azure Synapse - Azure Synapse Analytics
Content Source: articles/synapse-analytics/security/synapse-workspace-understand-what-role-you-need.md
Service: synapse-analytics
Sub-service: security
GitHub Login: @meenalsri
Microsoft Alias: mesrivas

This feedback specifically applies to this page:
link

Thanks for the feedback! We have assigned the issue to the content author to further review this and update the document as appropriate.

@SnehaGunda to please help with this.

#reassign:@SnehaGunda

Made some changes in the above PR that address this issue. Changes will go live by end of the day. Closing this issue now.
#please-close

authors: KranthiPakala-MSFT SnehaGunda meenalsri rosscouldrey


text:
Clarification needed for customers on alternatives to get the change applied if latest image is in use

when customers switch to managed identities , they are meant to execute the upgrade of their nodepools, but if the nodepools are using the latest image already , the change wont be applied. This is by design.
This text can be updated:
From:
"After updating, your cluster's control plane and addon pods will switch to use managed identity, but kubelet will KEEP USING SERVICE PRINCIPAL until you upgrade your agentpool. Perform an az aks nodepool upgrade --node-image-only on your nodes to complete the update to managed identity."
To something like this:
"After updating, your cluster's control plane and addon pods will switch to use managed identity, but kubelet will KEEP USING SERVICE PRINCIPAL until you upgrade your agentpool. Perform an az aks nodepool upgrade --node-image-only on your nodes to complete the update to managed identity. Nodepolls using latest image already wont be updated until a new image gets released, then the command can be executed to get the feature applied."
Alternatives to force the upgrade when latest image = true , could be added:

wait for a new image to be released for your cluster nodes, then execute the command to get managed identities applied.  Upgrade Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) node images - Azure Kubernetes Service | Microsoft Docs

Do a cluster, nodepool upgrade to the next available AKS version.  Upgrade an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Kubernetes Service | Microsoft Docs

look for the node resource group of your cluster, normally called MC_ , delete the entire VMSS object, not just the instances, then force the reconcile of the cluster with this command: az resource update --ids  or by executing the upgrade of the cluster to the same version currently in use.

az aks upgrade
--resource-group myResourceGroup
--name myAKSCluster
--kubernetes-version KUBERNETES_VERSION

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 6a9c74a8-9f1a-3d3d-3aed-f8ec45f92e05
Version Independent ID: 01e98043-dc80-490e-a761-8d558ff4e6df
Content: Use managed identities in Azure Kubernetes Service - Azure Kubernetes Service
Content Source: articles/aks/use-managed-identity.md
Service: container-service
GitHub Login: @zr-msft
Microsoft Alias: zarhoads

Hello @porrascarlos802018,
Thank you for your feedback. We will investigate and update the thread further.

Hello @porrascarlos802018,
I have reached out to conten author and they have considered investigate this behavior and make the updates as required. Once we have an update we shall keep this thread posted.
Feel free to reach ou for any queries or concerns.

Thank you for the feedback!
The article has been updated to address your feedback.
#please-close


text:
Remove statement about auto-generating workload CA cert in iotedge 1.2 doc

This doc has the following statement, which is no longer true for 1.2:
"The IoT Edge security manager also generates a workload CA certificate signed by the device CA certificate"
I suggest adding a 'Changes in version 1.2' section like in the following doc, where it mentions that the workload CA certificate is deprecated in iotedge 1.2: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-edge/iot-edge-certs?view=iotedge-2020-11#changes-in-version-12

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 94792ff1-5976-90f4-5092-0d8d8ff01635
Version Independent ID: d65482d2-64cc-56b1-c52a-b3ddde07b205
Content: Manage device certificates - Azure IoT Edge
Content Source: articles/iot-edge/how-to-manage-device-certificates.md
Service: iot-edge
GitHub Login: @PatAltimore
Microsoft Alias: patricka

@nlcamp Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

Assigning this issue to the author @PatAltimore  since the changes needs to be updated to the entire doc and linked doc.
@PatAltimore  Please review this and update.

Thanks for the feedback. The 'workload' line was removed from the 1.2 sections of the documentation and a new 1.2 section was added that explain changes with 1.2. Closing this issue, but feel free to reopen if you need to continue the conversation. New changes should be published in the next 24 hours.
#please-close

authors: AshokPeddakotla-MSFT nlcamp w-azure


text:
The first common issues and solution only works for Microsoft Accounts not Organisational accounts

The section You see the message “We cannot proceed with sign-up due to an issue with your account. Please contact billing support” in setup 1 suggests to signin to the account center but the url only works for Microsoft Accounts. We have an Azure subscription that uses Organisational accountss so this step will not work.

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 0c90e134-28de-dd70-5bce-c4a829866288
Version Independent ID: 2c62c86f-4bac-9cce-f05d-ebd95cbb3d15
Content: Troubleshoot issues when you sign up for a new account in the Azure portal
Content Source: articles/cost-management-billing/manage/troubleshoot-azure-sign-up.md
Service: cost-management-billing
Sub-service: billing
GitHub Login: @bandersmsft
Microsoft Alias: banders

Hi @jbennink. Sorry you ran into problems. I’ll revise that section of the article (in bold text here) to state “If you see the message and you have a Microsoft account, follow these steps:”
Were you able to resolve your sign in problem? If so, what was the problem and how was it resolved?
Thanks.

#please-close

authors: bandersmsft jbennink


text:
Typo "Azure Monitor application Insights"→"Azure Monitor Application …

…Insights"
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/app/azure-web-apps-net https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-monitor/app/azure-web-apps-net.md #PingMSFTDocs

Learn Build status updates of commit 021c833:
:bulb: Validation status: suggestions

File
Status
Preview URL
Details

articles/azure-monitor/app/azure-web-apps-net.md
:bulb:Suggestion

Details

articles/azure-monitor/app/azure-web-apps-net.md

Line 188, Column 254: [Suggestion: docs-link-absolute - See documentation] Absolute link 'https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/framework/configure-apps/file-schema/runtime/bindingredirect-element' will be broken in isolated environments. Replace with a relative link.

For more details, please refer to the build report.
Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.
Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings or suggestions unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them.
For any questions, please:Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Learn support channel

Looks good; thanks @hyoshioka0128

source: gharchive/pull-request


text:
Update service-tags-overview.md

Clarification on "Internet" Service Tag since it causes confusion when there are other Default Routes being learned from OnPremises or other peered VNETs. Added text "This Service tag only applies where the traffic does not hit any other Service Tag."

Learn Build status updates of commit ad3a09b:
:white_check_mark: Validation status: passed

File
Status
Preview URL
Details

articles/virtual-network/service-tags-overview.md
:white_check_mark:Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.
Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.
For any questions, please:Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Learn support channel

@asudbring

Can you review this PR?
IMPORTANT: When this content is ready to merge, you must add #sign-off in a comment or the approval may get overlooked.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

Learn Build status updates of commit d4f4393:
:white_check_mark: Validation status: passed

File
Status
Preview URL
Details

articles/virtual-network/service-tags-overview.md
:white_check_mark:Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.
Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.
For any questions, please:Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Learn support channel

#sign-off


text:
Unified code block

Unified code block for easier use

@mrbullwinkle
IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.
#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

#sign-off

authors: ShannonLeavitt lanicolas mrbullwinkle


text:
Update soft-delete-container-enable.md

I was looking how to retrieve the current settings for container blob soft delete in Azure PowerShell and couldn't find which command to use.
Then I found that the command Get-AzStorageBlobServiceProperty in the page soft-delete-blob-enable.md actually returns the properties ContainerDeleteRetentionPolicy.Enabled and ContainerDeleteRetentionPolicy.Days which are what I was looking for.
So this PR is to update the page soft-delete-container-enable.md to add how to retrieve the current settings for container soft delete as it is done for blob soft delete. I updated both PowerShell and Azure CLI tab to match what is already written on soft-delete-blob-enable.md.

Very nice. Thanks for enhancing the sections!
#sign-off

authors: normesta vandriot


text:
Update front-door-route-matching.md

Minor grammar change.

Thanks, @boykoc!


text:
Clarify Advanced supports clusterip

Clarify Advanced supports interservice communication with the standard service type (cluster ip) while basic does not?
Not sure if this is true. If not I'll change to say pod to pod through a cluster ip does work in basic.

@paulgmiller : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @mmacy, has been notified to review your proposed change.

#please-close

authors: PRMerger9 mmacy paulgmiller


text:
Added clarity to a note

Clarity on co-existence VPN ER

@ccompy Please review these proposed changes. Thanks.

First thanks for the suggestion but the suggested changes do not read properly.  You wrote:
While the VNET Integration feature will work with a Site to Site VPN to access on premise resources it currently VNET Integration feature will not integrate to a VNET that has an ExpressRoute Gateway configured in [coexistence mode][VPNERCoex]. This is true when integrating with either a Classic or Resource Manager VNET.  If you need to access resources through an ExpressRoute VPN then you can use an [ASE][ASEVNET] which can run in your VNET.
How about instead:
The VNET Integration feature does not integrate an app with a VNet that has an ExpressRoute Gateway.  Even if the ExpressRoute Gateway is configured in [coexistence mode][VPNERCoex] it will not work. If you need to access resources through an ExpressRoute connection then you can use an [App Service Environment][ASE] which runs in your VNet.
The links should be:
[VPNERCoex]: http://docs.microsoft.com/azure/expressroute/expressroute-howto-coexist-resource-manager
[ASE]: http://docs.microsoft.com/azure/app-service/app-service-environment/intro

The ASE intro doc is new with ASEv2 which is about out the door.
My original intent was to hit on the transit routing issue but it is a bit wordy.  It is easier to simply say that it will not integrate with a VNet that has an ER GW.  Eventually we will fix that but even then, you still won't be able to get through the ER from the P2S connection.   If you make the changes I suggested then I can sign off on the clarification.

@ccompy done.

That’s better 😊. Let me change that.
From: Christina Compy (MSFT) [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 18:25
To: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs azure-docs@noreply.github.com
Cc: Olivier Martin omartin@live.ca; Author author@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs] Added clarity to a note (#2066)
First thanks for the suggestion but the suggested changes do not read properly. You wrote:
While the VNET Integration feature will work with a Site to Site VPN to access on premise resources it currently VNET Integration feature will not integrate to a VNET that has an ExpressRoute Gateway configured in coexistence mode. This is true when integrating with either a Classic or Resource Manager VNET. If you need to access resources through an ExpressRoute VPN then you can use an [ASE][ASEVNET] which can run in your VNET.
How about instead:
The VNET Integration feature does not integrate an app with a VNet that has an ExpressRoute Gateway. Even if the ExpressRoute Gateway is configured in coexistence mode it will not work. If you need to access resources through an ExpressRoute connection then you can use an App Service Environment which runs in your VNet.
The links should be:
The ASE intro doc is new with ASEv2 which is about out the door.
My original intent was to hit on the transit routing issue but it is a bit wordy. It is easier to simply say that it will not integrate with a VNet that has an ER GW. Eventually we will fix that but even then, you still won't be able to get through the ER from the P2S connection. If you make the changes I suggested then I can sign off on the clarification.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/2066#issuecomment-314915246, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK2FXm4nqUDdzOF14DOY0x0AE8XRvP_kks5sNUfTgaJpZM4N7wqS.

Cool.  Good feedback  :-)
#sign-off

@omartin2010 @ccompy, Unfortunately, there are merge conflicts with this pull request.  Please resolve the conflicts and sign-off again when ready. Guidance for resolving merge conflicts. Thanks

Fixed.

#sign-off


text:
Better explanation of "Reserved capacity type"

Changed the description of "Reserved capacity type" as this was not clear...

@EricBergDE : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @rimman, has been notified to review your proposed change.

@EricBergDE Thanks for your contribution, did you work with someone on the Cosmos DB team before contributing to the doc? If not, I will check with the team to confirm the technical accuracy of the content.

@snehagunda I did not work with CosmosDB team. Information is based on other docs. feel free to check with the team.

@EricBergDE sorry about the delay, I got a confirmation from our team, the information is technically correct. The framing of the sentence is little confusing will you be able to update it to:
"You can buy a reservation for the provisioned throughput for both setups - single region writes as well as multiple region writes."
Please let me know if you can't update, we will merge your changes and then I can submit an edit from my end.
Thanks!

@EricBergDE : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @rimman, has been notified to review your proposed change.

@EricBergDE sorry about the delay, I got a confirmation from our team, the information is technically correct. The framing of the sentence is little confusing will you be able to update it to:
"You can buy a reservation for the provisioned throughput for both setups - single region writes as well as multiple region writes."
Please let me know if you can't update, we will merge your changes and then I can submit an edit from my end.
Thanks!

I have changed accordingly

#sign-off

@SnehaGunda: I'm sorry - only the author of this article, @rimman, can sign off on your changes. But we do have an exception process - if you are on the Microsoft content or product team for this product area, you can ask the PR review team to review and merge it by sending mail to the techdocprs alias.

#sign-off


text:
"az set account" does not work

Updated with right syntax of "az account set"

@prwani-microsoft : Thanks for your contribution to the Azure documentation! The author, @hning86, has been notified to review your proposed change.

#please-close
This change is made in a separate PR due to the conflict.
@prwani-microsoft Thanks for your contributions. ~Jason

#please-close

authors: JasonWHowell PRmerger prwani-microsoft


text:
update

addressing some immediate customer concerns

@sauryadas : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@jborsecnik : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@sauryadas : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@sauryadas : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.


text:
Updated #4 under Enable Logging

Possibly due to a portal update the documentation on where to find "Diagnostics settings" was incorrect. I had to look for a few minutes to find it and realized it is now under Activity log.

@Tyeskins : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

#sign-off

authors: PRMerger9 Tyeskins asudbring


text:
Get service principal ID for AAD App

Fix Powershell code to get the service principal ID for the AAD Application, rather than the ObjectID for the AAD App.
Using the AAD App's ObjectID in a Lighthouse definition results in an error from AAD.

@kwill-MSFT : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.


text:
Added link to RBAC examples

Added link to RBAC examples

GitHub Issue: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/90796
cc: @rolyon

@JamesTran-MSFT : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

#sign-off

authors: JamesTran-MSFT PRMerger7 rolyon


text:
Update cyberark-saml-authentication-tutorial.md

Removed wrong references to bizdevtech@cyberark.com email and replaced by "CyberArk Administration team"

@cyberark-bizdev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@cyberark-bizdev We made suggested change in another PR from our private repo. So closing this PR now.
#please-close