text:
Configuração do Terraform

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=5y6khsbk07]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_FwT2wI3F6]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=mn1vk9]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-5y6khsbk07-mn1vk9-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-5y6khsbk07-mn1vk9-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=5k747g967ir9kgj33bhll211lo]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=3y7pzx]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @g12-4soat, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=5y6khsbk07]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_FwT2wI3F6]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=mn1vk9]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=5k747g967ir9kgj33bhll211lo]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-5y6khsbk07-mn1vk9-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-5y6khsbk07-mn1vk9-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=3y7pzx]
Note: Objects have changed outside of Terraform
Terraform detected the following changes made outside of Terraform since the
last "terraform apply" which may have affected this plan:
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy has been deleted

resource "aws_api_gateway_method" "proxy" {

http_method          = "ANY" -> null
id                   = "agm-5y6khsbk07-mn1vk9-ANY"
resource_id          = "mn1vk9" -> null
(6 unchanged attributes hidden)

}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy has been deleted

resource "aws_api_gateway_resource" "proxy" {

id          = "mn1vk9" -> null
(4 unchanged attributes hidden)

}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay has been deleted

resource "aws_api_gateway_rest_api" "tech_lanches_api_gateweay" {

execution_arn                = "arn:aws:execute-api:us-east-1:590184128247:5y6khsbk07" -> null

id                           = "5y6khsbk07" -> null
name                         = "tech-lanches-api-gateway"

root_resource_id             = "655vb4iotf" -> null
tags                         = {
"Name" = "techlanches_apigateway"
}
(6 unchanged attributes hidden)
(1 unchanged block hidden)

}

module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool has been deleted

resource "aws_cognito_user_pool" "tech_lanches_clientes_pool" {

id                        = "us-east-1_FwT2wI3F6" -> null
name                      = "tech-lanches-clientes-pool"
tags                      = {
"Name" = "tech_lanches_clientes_pool"
}
(10 unchanged attributes hidden)
(6 unchanged blocks hidden)

}

module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda has been deleted

resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {

function_name                  = "tech-lanches-lambda" -> null
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"

invoke_arn                     = "arn:aws:apigateway:us-east-1:lambda:path/2015-03-31/functions/arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:590184128247:function:tech-lanches-lambda/invocations" -> null
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
(21 unchanged attributes hidden)
(2 unchanged blocks hidden)

}

Unless you have made equivalent changes to your configuration, or ignored the
relevant attributes using ignore_changes, the following plan may include
actions to undo or respond to these changes.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:

create
-/+ destroy and then create replacement

Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment must be replaced
-/+ resource "aws_api_gateway_deployment" "gateway_deployment" {
~ created_date  = "2024-02-27T16:19:43Z" -> (known after apply)
~ execution_arn = "arn:aws:execute-api:us-east-1:590184128247:5y6khsbk07/Development" -> (known after apply)
~ id            = "3y7pzx" -> (known after apply)
~ invoke_url    = "https://5y6khsbk07.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Development" -> (known after apply)
~ rest_api_id   = "5y6khsbk07" # forces replacement -> (known after apply) # forces replacement
# (1 unchanged attribute hidden)
}
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_integration" "lambda" {

cache_namespace         = (known after apply)
connection_type         = "INTERNET"
http_method             = "ANY"
id                      = (known after apply)
integration_http_method = "POST"
passthrough_behavior    = (known after apply)
resource_id             = (known after apply)
rest_api_id             = (known after apply)
timeout_milliseconds    = 29000
type                    = "AWS_PROXY"
uri                     = (known after apply)
}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_method" "proxy" {

api_key_required = false
authorization    = "NONE"
http_method      = "ANY"
id               = (known after apply)
resource_id      = (known after apply)
rest_api_id      = (known after apply)
}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_resource" "proxy" {

id          = (known after apply)
parent_id   = (known after apply)
path        = (known after apply)
path_part   = "{proxy+}"
rest_api_id = (known after apply)
}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_rest_api" "tech_lanches_api_gateweay" {

api_key_source               = (known after apply)
arn                          = (known after apply)
binary_media_types           = (known after apply)
created_date                 = (known after apply)
description                  = (known after apply)
disable_execute_api_endpoint = (known after apply)
execution_arn                = (known after apply)
id                           = (known after apply)
minimum_compression_size     = (known after apply)
name                         = "tech-lanches-api-gateway"
policy                       = (known after apply)
root_resource_id             = (known after apply)
tags                         = {

"Name" = "techlanches_apigateway"
}

tags_all                     = {

"Name" = "techlanches_apigateway"
}
}

module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda will be created

resource "aws_lambda_permission" "apigateway_lambda" {

action              = "lambda:InvokeFunction"
function_name       = "tech-lanches-lambda"
id                  = (known after apply)
principal           = "apigateway.amazonaws.com"
source_arn          = (known after apply)
statement_id        = "AllowAPIGatewayInvoke"
statement_id_prefix = (known after apply)
}

module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool will be created

resource "aws_cognito_user_pool" "tech_lanches_clientes_pool" {

arn                        = (known after apply)

creation_date              = (known after apply)

custom_domain              = (known after apply)

deletion_protection        = "INACTIVE"

domain                     = (known after apply)

email_verification_message = (known after apply)

email_verification_subject = (known after apply)

endpoint                   = (known after apply)

estimated_number_of_users  = (known after apply)

id                         = (known after apply)

last_modified_date         = (known after apply)

mfa_configuration          = "OFF"

name                       = "tech-lanches-clientes-pool"

sms_verification_message   = (known after apply)

tags                       = {

"Name" = "tech_lanches_clientes_pool"
}

tags_all                   = {

"Name" = "tech_lanches_clientes_pool"
}

username_configuration {

case_sensitive = false
}
}

module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client will be created

resource "aws_cognito_user_pool_client" "tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client" {

access_token_validity                         = (known after apply)
allowed_oauth_flows                           = (known after apply)
allowed_oauth_flows_user_pool_client          = (known after apply)
allowed_oauth_scopes                          = (known after apply)
auth_session_validity                         = (known after apply)
callback_urls                                 = (known after apply)
client_secret                                 = (sensitive value)
default_redirect_uri                          = (known after apply)
enable_propagate_additional_user_context_data = (known after apply)
enable_token_revocation                       = (known after apply)
explicit_auth_flows                           = (known after apply)
id                                            = (known after apply)
id_token_validity                             = (known after apply)
logout_urls                                   = (known after apply)
name                                          = "pool-client"
prevent_user_existence_errors                 = (known after apply)
read_attributes                               = (known after apply)
refresh_token_validity                        = (known after apply)
supported_identity_providers                  = (known after apply)
user_pool_id                                  = (known after apply)
write_attributes                              = (known after apply)
}

module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be created

resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {

architectures                  = (known after apply)
arn                            = (known after apply)
function_name                  = "tech-lanches-lambda"
handler                        = "TechLanches.API::TechLanches.API.LambdaEntryPoint::FunctionHandlerAsync"
id                             = (known after apply)
invoke_arn                     = (known after apply)
last_modified                  = (known after apply)
memory_size                    = 128
package_type                   = "Zip"
publish                        = false
qualified_arn                  = (known after apply)
qualified_invoke_arn           = (known after apply)
reserved_concurrent_executions = -1
role                           = "arn:aws:iam::590184128247:role/LabRole"
runtime                        = "dotnet6"
s3_bucket                      = "techlanches-terraform"
s3_key                         = "techlanches-lambda-auth/aws-lambda-net8-di-ioc.zip"
signing_job_arn                = (known after apply)
signing_profile_version_arn    = (known after apply)
skip_destroy                   = false
source_code_hash               = (known after apply)
source_code_size               = (known after apply)
tags                           = {

"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}

tags_all                       = {

"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}

timeout                        = 3
version                        = (known after apply)
}

Plan: 9 to add, 0 to change, 1 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=fq41sh74il]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_kWPd2KP4W]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=pz34dj]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-fq41sh74il-pz34dj-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-fq41sh74il-pz34dj-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1bkkdut41k2h1pik3okp2739jj]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=ue8mxw]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=0yogx760ri]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_sWyPikosP]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=xr97pn]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-0yogx760ri-xr97pn-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-0yogx760ri-xr97pn-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=5tmnh8d083pr8ff31askcht3ne]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=u36og4]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
- filename                       = "AWSServerless2.zip" -> null
~ handler                        = "AWSServerless2::AWSServerless2.Functions_Get_Generated::Get" -> "TechLanches.API::TechLanches.API.LambdaEntryPoint::FunctionHandlerAsync"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-02-29T00:48:30.459+0000" -> (known after apply)
~ runtime                        = "dotnet8" -> "dotnet6"
+ s3_bucket                      = "techlanches-terraform"
+ s3_key                         = "techlanches-lambda-auth/aws-lambda-net8-di-ioc.zip"
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (18 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (2 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
~ filename                       = "Serverless/AWSServerless1/bin/Release/net8.0/AWSServerless1.zip" -> "Serverless/LambdaAuth/bin/Release/net8.0/LambdaAuth.zip"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-03-05T13:32:45.000+0000" -> (known after apply)
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (20 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
~ filename                       = "Serverless/AWSServerless1/bin/Release/net8.0/AWSServerless1.zip" -> "Serverless/LambdaAuth/bin/Release/net8.0/LambdaAuth.zip"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-03-05T13:32:45.000+0000" -> (known after apply)
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (20 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
~ filename                       = "Serverless/AWSServerless1/bin/Release/net8.0/AWSServerless1.zip" -> "Serverless/LambdaAuth/bin/Release/net8.0/LambdaAuth.zip"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-03-05T13:32:45.000+0000" -> (known after apply)
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (20 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
~ filename                       = "Serverless/AWSServerless1/bin/Release/net8.0/AWSServerless1.zip" -> "Serverless/auth_lambda.zip"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-03-05T13:32:45.000+0000" -> (known after apply)
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (20 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
~ filename                       = "Serverless/AWSServerless1/bin/Release/net8.0/AWSServerless1.zip" -> "Serverless/auth_lambda.zip"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-03-05T13:32:45.000+0000" -> (known after apply)
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (20 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
~ filename                       = "Serverless/AWSServerless1/bin/Release/net8.0/AWSServerless1.zip" -> "Serverless/auth_lambda.zip"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-03-05T13:32:45.000+0000" -> (known after apply)
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (20 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {
~ filename                       = "Serverless/AWSServerless1/bin/Release/net8.0/AWSServerless1.zip" -> "Serverless/auth_lambda.zip"
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"
~ last_modified                  = "2024-03-05T13:32:45.000+0000" -> (known after apply)
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
# (20 unchanged attributes hidden)
    # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=qmqngamsb0]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_y9boC0aS4]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=1vsbgthkpf0n1dnfr70ti3ge5c]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=bcb5kh]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=8fi5ob]
Note: Objects have changed outside of Terraform
Terraform detected the following changes made outside of Terraform since the
last "terraform apply" which may have affected this plan:
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy has been deleted

resource "aws_api_gateway_method" "proxy" {

http_method          = "ANY" -> null
id                   = "agm-qmqngamsb0-bcb5kh-ANY"
resource_id          = "bcb5kh" -> null
(6 unchanged attributes hidden)

}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy has been deleted

resource "aws_api_gateway_resource" "proxy" {

id          = "bcb5kh" -> null
(4 unchanged attributes hidden)

}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay has been deleted

resource "aws_api_gateway_rest_api" "tech_lanches_api_gateweay" {

execution_arn                = "arn:aws:execute-api:us-east-1:590184128247:qmqngamsb0" -> null

id                           = "qmqngamsb0" -> null
name                         = "tech-lanches-api-gateway"

root_resource_id             = "1lu305asz8" -> null
tags                         = {
"Name" = "techlanches_apigateway"
}
(6 unchanged attributes hidden)
(1 unchanged block hidden)

}

module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool has been deleted

resource "aws_cognito_user_pool" "tech_lanches_clientes_pool" {

id                        = "us-east-1_y9boC0aS4" -> null
name                      = "tech-lanches-clientes-pool"
tags                      = {
"Name" = "tech_lanches_clientes_pool"
}
(10 unchanged attributes hidden)
(6 unchanged blocks hidden)

}

module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda has been deleted

resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {

function_name                  = "tech-lanches-lambda" -> null
id                             = "tech-lanches-lambda"

invoke_arn                     = "arn:aws:apigateway:us-east-1:lambda:path/2015-03-31/functions/arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:590184128247:function:tech-lanches-lambda/invocations" -> null
tags                           = {
"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}
(20 unchanged attributes hidden)
(3 unchanged blocks hidden)

}

Unless you have made equivalent changes to your configuration, or ignored the
relevant attributes using ignore_changes, the following plan may include
actions to undo or respond to these changes.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:

create
-/+ destroy and then create replacement

Terraform will perform the following actions:
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment must be replaced
-/+ resource "aws_api_gateway_deployment" "gateway_deployment" {
~ created_date  = "2024-03-01T22:25:45Z" -> (known after apply)
~ execution_arn = "arn:aws:execute-api:us-east-1:590184128247:qmqngamsb0/Development" -> (known after apply)
~ id            = "8fi5ob" -> (known after apply)
~ invoke_url    = "https://qmqngamsb0.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Development" -> (known after apply)
~ rest_api_id   = "qmqngamsb0" # forces replacement -> (known after apply) # forces replacement
# (1 unchanged attribute hidden)
}
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_integration" "lambda" {

cache_namespace         = (known after apply)
connection_type         = "INTERNET"
http_method             = "ANY"
id                      = (known after apply)
integration_http_method = "POST"
passthrough_behavior    = (known after apply)
resource_id             = (known after apply)
rest_api_id             = (known after apply)
timeout_milliseconds    = 29000
type                    = "AWS_PROXY"
uri                     = (known after apply)
}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_method" "proxy" {

api_key_required = false
authorization    = "NONE"
http_method      = "ANY"
id               = (known after apply)
resource_id      = (known after apply)
rest_api_id      = (known after apply)
}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_resource" "proxy" {

id          = (known after apply)
parent_id   = (known after apply)
path        = (known after apply)
path_part   = "{proxy+}"
rest_api_id = (known after apply)
}

module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay will be created

resource "aws_api_gateway_rest_api" "tech_lanches_api_gateweay" {

api_key_source               = (known after apply)
arn                          = (known after apply)
binary_media_types           = (known after apply)
created_date                 = (known after apply)
description                  = (known after apply)
disable_execute_api_endpoint = (known after apply)
execution_arn                = (known after apply)
id                           = (known after apply)
minimum_compression_size     = (known after apply)
name                         = "tech-lanches-api-gateway"
policy                       = (known after apply)
root_resource_id             = (known after apply)
tags                         = {

"Name" = "techlanches_apigateway"
}

tags_all                     = {

"Name" = "techlanches_apigateway"
}
}

module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda will be created

resource "aws_lambda_permission" "apigateway_lambda" {

action              = "lambda:InvokeFunction"
function_name       = "tech-lanches-lambda"
id                  = (known after apply)
principal           = "apigateway.amazonaws.com"
source_arn          = (known after apply)
statement_id        = "AllowAPIGatewayInvoke"
statement_id_prefix = (known after apply)
}

module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool will be created

resource "aws_cognito_user_pool" "tech_lanches_clientes_pool" {

arn                        = (known after apply)

creation_date              = (known after apply)

custom_domain              = (known after apply)

deletion_protection        = "INACTIVE"

domain                     = (known after apply)

email_verification_message = (known after apply)

email_verification_subject = (known after apply)

endpoint                   = (known after apply)

estimated_number_of_users  = (known after apply)

id                         = (known after apply)

last_modified_date         = (known after apply)

mfa_configuration          = "OFF"

name                       = "tech-lanches-clientes-pool"

sms_verification_message   = (known after apply)

tags                       = {

"Name" = "tech_lanches_clientes_pool"
}

tags_all                   = {

"Name" = "tech_lanches_clientes_pool"
}

username_configuration {

case_sensitive = false
}
}

module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client will be created

resource "aws_cognito_user_pool_client" "tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client" {

access_token_validity                         = (known after apply)
allowed_oauth_flows                           = (known after apply)
allowed_oauth_flows_user_pool_client          = (known after apply)
allowed_oauth_scopes                          = (known after apply)
auth_session_validity                         = (known after apply)
callback_urls                                 = (known after apply)
client_secret                                 = (sensitive value)
default_redirect_uri                          = (known after apply)
enable_propagate_additional_user_context_data = (known after apply)
enable_token_revocation                       = (known after apply)
explicit_auth_flows                           = [

"ALLOW_ADMIN_USER_PASSWORD_AUTH",
"ALLOW_REFRESH_TOKEN_AUTH",
"ALLOW_USER_SRP_AUTH",
]

id                                            = (known after apply)
id_token_validity                             = (known after apply)
logout_urls                                   = (known after apply)
name                                          = "pool-client"
prevent_user_existence_errors                 = (known after apply)
read_attributes                               = (known after apply)
refresh_token_validity                        = (known after apply)
supported_identity_providers                  = (known after apply)
user_pool_id                                  = (known after apply)
write_attributes                              = (known after apply)
}

module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda will be created

resource "aws_lambda_function" "tech_lanches_lambda" {

architectures                  = (known after apply)
arn                            = (known after apply)
filename                       = "Serverless/auth_lambda.zip"
function_name                  = "tech-lanches-lambda"
handler                        = "TechLanchesLambda::TechLanchesLambda.Functions_LambdaAuth_Generated::LambdaAuth"
id                             = (known after apply)
invoke_arn                     = (known after apply)
last_modified                  = (known after apply)
memory_size                    = 512
package_type                   = "Zip"
publish                        = false
qualified_arn                  = (known after apply)
qualified_invoke_arn           = (known after apply)
reserved_concurrent_executions = -1
role                           = "arn:aws:iam::590184128247:role/LabRole"
runtime                        = "dotnet8"
signing_job_arn                = (known after apply)
signing_profile_version_arn    = (known after apply)
skip_destroy                   = false
source_code_hash               = (known after apply)
source_code_size               = (known after apply)
tags                           = {

"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}

tags_all                       = {

"Name" = "tech-lanches-lambda"
}

timeout                        = 30
version                        = (known after apply)
}

Plan: 9 to add, 0 to change, 1 to destroy.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Note: You didn't use the -out option to save this plan, so Terraform can't
guarantee to take exactly these actions if you run "terraform apply" now.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=9uueuvotq5]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_5A6bATvmy]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=n3215l]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=3fgqf5tfnlsoec3390l730tflp]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=prtpif]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=9uueuvotq5]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_5A6bATvmy]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=n3215l]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=3fgqf5tfnlsoec3390l730tflp]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=prtpif]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=9uueuvotq5]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_5A6bATvmy]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=n3215l]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=3fgqf5tfnlsoec3390l730tflp]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=prtpif]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success
Terraform Initialization ⚙success
Terraform Validation 🤖success
Terraform Plan 📖success
Show Plan
```terraform
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_rest_api.tech_lanches_api_gateweay: Refreshing state... [id=9uueuvotq5]
module.lambda.aws_lambda_function.tech_lanches_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=tech-lanches-lambda]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool.tech_lanches_clientes_pool: Refreshing state... [id=us-east-1_5A6bATvmy]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_resource.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=n3215l]
module.cognito.aws_cognito_user_pool_client.tech_lanches_clientes_pool_client: Refreshing state... [id=3fgqf5tfnlsoec3390l730tflp]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_method.proxy: Refreshing state... [id=agm-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_lambda_permission.apigateway_lambda: Refreshing state... [id=AllowAPIGatewayInvoke]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_integration.lambda: Refreshing state... [id=agi-9uueuvotq5-n3215l-ANY]
module.apiGateway.aws_api_gateway_deployment.gateway_deployment: Refreshing state... [id=prtpif]
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.
</details>
*Pushed by: @nsosoares, Action: `pull_request`*


text:
Feature/capture feedback

Hi @vktr-r2
Tested changes locally, approved for merging.
Thank you for the opportunity to review your PR!

@BlackBond06 Use the green Review button at the top of the PR to submit your review. You will get a popup to review the PR, with options to comment, request changes or approve.
https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews

@victor20m In the future, please enter a description of your changes in the desciption box of the PR.
Merging this PR.
Thanks for your contribution!

@gbowne1 I still need to add a comment after I have approved the changes ?

no, it may not have picked up that. But I looked and I see it did now.  thanks @BlackBond06

source: gharchive/pull-request

license: MIT

license_type: permissive

license_source: github-api


text:
The old extension setting for enabling Sequence Diagram support is removed

@brikelly , do you mean this setting?

Yes, that's the one - but we can't remove it until we have feature equivalence with the PlantUML stuff. So we still need sequence diffs before we can remove this, basically.

source: gharchive/issue

authors: ahtrotta brikelly

repo: getappmap/vscode-appland


text:
Adds homepage tagline

For background I asked for this :)

authors: BrandonRomano mitchellh

repo: ghostty-org/website


text:
expand pre-comit hooks

Hi @lizkent, I found a typo in the ICOADS code tables. Can you help me out?
e.g. deck195_II_td11
"-": "observation taken in port ot immediate vicinity",

What should ot be; or, at, anything else?

Hi,
Should be “or” I think,
Liz
From: Ludwig Lierhammer @.>
Date: Tuesday, 25 June 2024 at 14:52
To: glamod/cdm_reader_mapper @.>
Cc: Elizabeth Kent @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [glamod/cdm_reader_mapper] expand pre-comit hooks (PR #56)
Caution: This email has originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and content is safe. Thank you.
Hi @lizkenthttps://github.com/lizkent, I found a typo in the ICOADS code tables. Can you help me out?
e.g. deck195_II_td11https://github.com/glamod/cdm_reader_mapper/blob/main/cdm_reader_mapper/mdf_reader/code_tables/deck195_II_td11/port_ind.json
"-": "observation taken in port ot immediate vicinity",
What should ot be; or, at, anything else?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/glamod/cdm_reader_mapper/pull/56#issuecomment-2189022241, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AELLE7RQYTSC7ER6GRDD6S3ZJFYYDAVCNFSM6AAAAABJZFWE3GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOBZGAZDEMRUGE.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system.
The National Oceanography Centre (NOC) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and malware checks before opening the attachments. NOC does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses.
Opinions, conclusions or other information in this message and attachments that are not related directly to NOC business are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of NOC.

authors: lizkent ludwiglierhammer


text:
webpack5 fixed

@najathi lgtm

authors: gnokoheat najathi

repo: gnokoheat/nextjs-ant-design-typescript


text:
checksum serial data

done - in development release
the only error I ever saw was missing characters so the checksum is a simple count of how many characters were sent

repo: gobabygocarswithjoysticks/programmer


text:
ssl test install

This PR was just meant to test if the ssl dev pacakges were installed.

repo: godber/asg-yarn-npm-test


text:
Merge into Godot 4

Since i posted here, this is an accident because i thought it supposed to merge all 4.0 files into 3.x, and to make matters worse, i added some personal information that's sensitive to scammers or anything like that. If possible, delete this PR.

If possible, delete this PR.

We can't remove PRs entirely as GitHub doesn't expose this functionality, even to repository owners.

authors: Calinou programneer

repo: godotengine/godot


text:
Add gradient norm to TensorBoard telemetry

This was already added as part of another commit.

authors: entrpn gobbleturk

repo: google/maxdiffusion


text:
tools/syz_covermerger.go: print dashapi error details

PTAL

repo: google/syzkaller

license_source: bigquery


text:
New bollean "Inhabited" field

New boolean "Inhabited" field for animal, that defines if territory is populated with people or not.

repo: goolab-community/tere


text:
func CheckSignatures

Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.02% :tada:

Comparison is base (b1467c0) 94.47% compared to head (45f56b1) 94.50%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #256      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.47%   94.50%   +0.02%
==========================================
  Files          14       14
  Lines        6338     6366      +28
==========================================
+ Hits         5988     6016      +28
  Misses        282      282
  Partials       68       68

Files Changed
Coverage Δ

func.go
97.67% <100.00%> (+0.28%)
:arrow_up:

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

authors: codecov-commenter visualfc

repo: goplus/gox


text:
作者你好，cross-request插件chrome好像不支持了，有替代方案么

额，之前没用到过这个功能，看了一下，目前能想到的就是使用child_process代替插件，但还在犹豫要不要修改

大佬，部署在生产环境，怎么调试本地启动的api

authors: gozeon kirito41dd olajowon

repo: gozeon/yapii


text:
Having a way to close all hidden or unhidden segments

Thanks to have taken this into account for a next enhancement !

I think that #75 would be a nice feature and which would remove the need for this one.

Absolutely !


text:
Document HT and LSTM.

Note that I invented types int and double for the specification, because it is really critical that some things are integers, and TypeScript apparently cannot express this.

repo: gradbench/gradbench


text:
Add reason field to cancel, assign, and finish

#27  👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

repo: gradientlabs-ai/go-client


text:
Remove active development warning

+1 from me


text:
feat(Logo): component refactoring

PR is waiting for next major

authors: Lunory kendoow

repo: gravity-ui/navigation


text:
Add youtube to card with image

Preview:
https://preview.gravity-ui.com/page-constructor/126/?path=/story/components-cards-mediacard--full-screen

Can you add story for CardWithMedia with youtube and fullscreen, please?

Can you add story for CardWithMedia with youtube and fullscreen, please?

it is here:

authors: gorgeousvlad yuberdysheva

repo: gravity-ui/page-constructor


text:
master或者v3.0以上都不支持engine了，如何才能在通信加密（TLS/TLCP）的时候使用PCI密码卡进行运算呢？

providers?

同问？有没有通信加密使用密码卡的相关教程？

authors: aSimpleSheep huchuanwen12 unicornadmin

repo: guanzhi/GmSSL


text:
Hello, how to use vae to refine the model in sdxl?

maybe is ckpt_path

repo: guoyww/AnimateDiff


text:
Issue teste

TESTE

Teste

TEste

Teste

repo: gustavoguanabara/git-github


text:
CLE Unit Tests

Codecov Report

Merging #53 (71e9710) into develop (abb792a) will decrease coverage by 2.26%.
The diff coverage is 96.66%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #53      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    80.76%   78.49%   -2.27%
===========================================
  Files           62       69       +7
  Lines         1731     1837     +106
===========================================
+ Hits          1398     1442      +44
- Misses         333      395      +62

Impacted Files
Coverage Δ

Modules/Sources/CV-SwiftUI/CLE/CLE.swift
100.00% <ø> (ø)

Modules/Sources/CV-SwiftUI/CV.swift
0.00% <ø> (ø)

Modules/Sources/Networking/APIClient.swift
84.61% <ø> (+7.69%)
:arrow_up:

...dules/Sources/TCADependencyKeys/APIClientKey.swift
0.00% <ø> (ø)

Modules/Sources/TestHelpers/Stub.swift
46.15% <ø> (-3.85%)
:arrow_down:

...ests/CollectionView/CollectionViewModelTests.swift
100.00% <ø> (ø)

Modules/Sources/TestHelpers/APIClient.swift
50.00% <75.00%> (ø)

Modules/Sources/TestHelpers/Stubs.swift
100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Modules/Tests/CV-SwiftUITests/CLETests.swift
100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

...sts/CV-UIKitTests/CLE/CLEViewControllerTests.swift
100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 16 more

:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

authors: codecov-commenter gwikiera

repo: gwikiera/CV


text:
fixed speed

what is happening 😮

repo: havsnapper/GitHubBootcamp


text:
Make WTForms a optional dependency

Codecov Report
Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (bb137c4) 82.78% compared to head (fe04973) 81.60%.

Files
Patch %
Lines

flask_ckeditor/__init__.py
50.00%
2 Missing :warning:

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #71      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.78%   81.60%   -1.19%
==========================================
  Files           3        3
  Lines         122      125       +3
==========================================
+ Hits          101      102       +1
- Misses         21       23       +2

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

authors: codecov-commenter greyli

repo: helloflask/flask-ckeditor


text:
TGP-1946 - Category is not Mandatory

Not needed

repo: hmrc/trader-goods-profiles-api-tests


text:
Bump CHIP Stack version and add additional examples

To disable auto re-subscription I set aShouldResubscribe = false; in src/controller/python/chip/clusters/attribute.cpp.

repo: home-assistant/addons-development


text:
Update copyright year to 2024

Thanks @devcamke

authors: afcapel devcamke

repo: hotwired/turbo


text:
V1.1

V1.1

repo: ilkerkrbyikk/Petify


text:
tst

tst

tst

tst


text:
STARCH-856 One-Time Number Generator

To be continued on #56

repo: indiana-university/iu-java-util


text:
chore: updated cosmwasm deps

building '/nix/store/0ik1fl7brsa8frgkm3nrc9d2d556r7wq-beaker-0.1.8.drv'...
error (ignored): error: cannot unlink '/tmp/nix-build-hermes-v1.7.4.drv-0/source/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps': Directory not empty
error (ignored): error: cannot unlink '/tmp/nix-build-beaker-0.1.8.drv-0': Directory not empty
error: writing to file: No space left on device
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

hopefully this will help get CI passing https://github.com/informalsystems/cosmos.nix/pull/227

authors: JonathanLorimer dzmitry-lahoda


text:
Emojis in boards to display own reactions

Reactions will show when i hover over the card (under – like a lappen). We should do it like GitHub and the emojis will be shown on the notes (as much as possible). Emojis: heart, thumb up, thumb down, clapping hands or celebration, sceptical smiley, laughing/happy smile and suprised smiley. Eveyone can react on the same Reaction and we will show the usernames in a tooltip (max: 12).

#2800

Almost done (see Figma file - at components: Reactions). Darkmode is done so far, i just have to transfer it in lightmode (will be created from 10.7 - 12.7).

Done!
We just have to revise the menu bar for mobile (#3236)

mobile menu bar (#3236) is done 👍
The Design for the reactions is now completely done!

authors: SelinaBuff bitionaire


text:
Update macOS screenshot to show the new UI and tag view

Not worth keeping an issue open for this. I'll do it if I get to it.

repo: inseven/bookmarks


text: Add aten::multinomial

repo: intel/torch-xpu-ops


text:
Update TurboRepo

Fixed by #1285


text:
fix spacing part 2

 Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Current dependencies on/for this PR:

main

PR #468   👈

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite.

authors: CLAassistant hbjORbj

repo: intuita-inc/codemod-registry


text:
Feat/int 755 unable to detect packagejson in mono repo and others

Moved to https://github.com/intuita-inc/intuita-vscode-extension/pull/233

repo: intuita-inc/intuita-vscode-extension


text:
Add lint testing framework

You can now test plugins by using // expect-lint comments inside your examples/tests
See https://github.com/invertase/dart_custom_lint#testing-your-plugins-using-expect_lint


text:
Bump telegram-menu to 0.7.1 in the stable repo

0.7.1 created 02.10.2023
50 User
OK


text:
Revise building-p4-programs.md

Practically speaking, this document is primarily about installing the ES2K P4 compiler and tools. This is a separate task from compiling the P4 program and deploying its artifacts. It's something you would do once, as apposed to the many times you would repeat the compile-prepare-deploy cycle once the tools were installed.
I would recommend making sections 1-3 as the basis of an "Installing" document and using sections 4-5 as the foundation of a separate "Building and Deploying" document.

repo: ipdk-io/networking-recipe


text:
Add python_outputs_test.py and tf support for multiple outputs

Closing as obsolete.

authors: benvanik phoenix-meadowlark

repo: iree-org/iree


text:
update createRecord response

Fix err of obtain record_id when Events is null
Add return transaction hash

repo: irisnet/irismod-sdk-go


text:
Add create content mode

Adds a new create dialog which can replace the edit screen and can be used for creating related items.

repo: its-devtastic/curator


text:
Update micropub.js

👷 Deploy Preview for golden-dango-ff6925 processing.

Name
Link

🔨 Latest commit
6027f117e327ed817e78e286159fb2c74bc5eac4

🔍 Latest deploy log
https://app.netlify.com/sites/golden-dango-ff6925/deploys/637d972c8ffa550008939a29

repo: ivey/benjifs-micropub


text:
Update custom format hover text for ja

Thanks.

repo: jaatroko/link-status-redux


text:
支持json字段   support json colname

新建一个 String2List, String2Set, String2Object

json字段类.只需要实现JsonColumn接口即可.

repo: javaoffers/briefest


text:
fix: vim.ui.inputsecret change to vim.fn.inputsecret.

duplicate of https://github.com/jcdickinson/codeium.nvim/pull/74


text:
Release 0.3.1

Codecov Report

Merging #128 (da1aa0f) into main (a5c3f0e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #128   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.70%   56.70%
=======================================
  Files          46       46
  Lines        1388     1388
=======================================
  Hits          787      787
  Misses        601      601

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d98d5f2...da1aa0f. Read the comment docs.

authors: codecov-commenter jdno

repo: jdno/auto-traffic-control


text:
Update Composer dependencies (2021-11-09-00-09)

Visual regression test passed!
View the visual regression test report


text:
Update Composer dependencies (2020-08-31-00-08)

Visual regression test passed!
View the visual regression test report


text:
Update Composer dependencies (2021-01-10-00-07)

Visual regression test passed!
View the visual regression test report

Visual regression test passed!
View the visual regression test report


text:
fix: upgrade to version 3.0.534

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign garethjevans
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @garethjevans in a comment when ready.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jenkins-x-bot-test: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name
Commit
Details
Rerun command

vault
6f5f52b04bd9c556e6601c0af293c840c554aba3
link
/test vault

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here.  If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jenkins-x-bot-test: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name
Commit
Details
Rerun command

vault
6f5f52b04bd9c556e6601c0af293c840c554aba3
link
/test vault

gsm
6f5f52b04bd9c556e6601c0af293c840c554aba3
link
/test gsm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here.  If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

repo: jenkins-x/jxr-versions


text:
golangci-lint: disable thelper

#48  👈
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @jespert and the rest of your teammates on  Graphite

Merge activity

May 17, 10:31 AM EDT: @jespert merged this pull request with Graphite.

repo: jespert/artk


text:
Update README.md

Muchas gracias por la colaboración.


text:
Update package.json, add missing devDependencies

@HowardTangHw Why is it necessary to add @babel/preset-react as a devDependency? Did you encounter issues?

@jlanssie Yes, I encountered a problem. During the Wepack build, JSX files were not being built correctly, and the JSX part was missing from the bundle. Adding the following devDependency resolved the issue.

Alright. Thanks for posting the PR. :-)

authors: HowardTangHw jlanssie

repo: jlanssie/wknd


text:
allow unicode characters in hashtag

I'd like some tests with this that verify that it does, indeed, allow unicode characters that can be considered words (and does not allow, say, whitespace classes). The existing tests are in tests/core/test_html.py - you can add a few cases under the existing hashtag test in test_parser.

That looks good - thanks!

authors: alphatownsman andrewgodwin

repo: jointakahe/takahe


text:
Add Lindenmayer library from Mutable Trees.

thank you for the contribution!


text:
Add curve: stepline to get straight lines in chart

Both curves should be stepline.

Thanks for providing this PR. I wasn't aware of the "stepline" option. I have used it myself for a while now.
As for Anders'  suggestion to also use stepline for the price curve. I think I personally prefer the current example without the stepline, which gives a smooth price curve.
BTW, I have been busy with some other things lately, so I haven't been able to work on this integration, but I will accept this PR "soon".

Prices on Nordpool does not change smoothly, they change stepwise by the hour. So a smooth graph will not reflect the truth.
/A

It’s unfortunate that it looks like the price changes at xx:30, rather than 00. Any way to fix?

@kalaws, are you using the example code in latest version of the documentation?
If you for the first serie (Electricty price), after the line type: line adds a new line curve: stepline, then you will get a graph with step-wise electricity price (see the picture from AndersHoglund above). This should make the price changes to happen more clearly at xx:00.
series:
  - entity: sensor.ev_smart_charging_charging
    name: Electricty price
    unit: ' öre/kWh'
    data_generator: >
      return entity.attributes.raw_two_days.map((entry) => { return [new
      Date(entry.start), entry.value]; });
    type: line
    curve: stepline   <===== ADD THIS LINE
    float_precision: 0
    show:
      in_header: before_now
    extend_to: false
    color_threshold:
      - value: -100
        color: cyan
      - value: 0
        color: green
      - value: 40
        color: orange
      - value: 100
        color: red
      - value: 200
        color: magenta
      - value: 500
        color: black

I am using the example code. What I mean is that when the time is like 06:30, it looks like the Now line is just about to cross into the next price. Solve it this way:
data_generator: >
      return entity.attributes.raw_two_days.map((entry) => { return [new
      Date(entry.start).getTime() + 30*60000, entry.value]; });

authors: AndersHoglund jonasbkarlsson kalaws moorgrove


text:
More skills and integration with classes

This is a mess to say the least and needs a rewrite, i'd rather start a new PR. Also, little to no progress has been done so it's not even a loss.

repo: jonathaneeckhout/jdungeon


text:
Learn/Implement Props and how to pass for Wheel Library Component

Hello World header rendering

Replace that with Custom "Segmented Circle"

Learn how to pass props with Svelte

repo: jor-col/svelte-custom-roulette


text:
Removing line 949 and extra lines

Tested and seems to patch the issue with OBS

repo: josephdadams/TallyArbiter


text:
fix: publish の対象からテストを除外

Codecov Report
Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (871cd47) compared to base (5459554).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #9   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%
=========================================
  Files            4         4
  Lines           69        69
  Branches        13        13
=========================================
  Hits            69        69

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

repo: jp-postal-code/react


text:
update readme text with conjure-up deployment instructions

LGTM

authors: battlemidget chuckbutler


text:
Added Selection Sort Algorithm in Python

@gsivanithin18 please remove .DS_Store file from the commit history

repo: justEhmadSaeed/Hacktoberfest


text:
work around socket.getfqdn bug on Mc

see e.g.

https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/79345
https://bugs.python.org/issue35164
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8625029/why-does-pythons-socket-getfqdn-return-a-long-string-that-looks-like-an-ipv6

repo: justpy-org/justpy


text:
Adds macros: rows and mrows for looping over multiple C arrays: (ptr T | UncheckedArray[T])

Looks like the warning directive is new for nim doc in 1.6.0.

Looks like the warning directive is new for nim doc in 1.6.0.

Ah, yes. Thanks!
Can you please rebase this PR and resolve the conflicts.

Good to go!

authors: geekrelief kaushalmodi


text:
Bump kysely to latest

Fixed in ae1581da2304f509bca24eeedc5b52b82f80851e. Please use the latest version.
Thank you.


text:
Update mbusd.md

Thanks @reedy

authors: kellerza reedy

repo: kellerza/sunsynk


text:
Add .gitignore

来信已收到，谢谢

来信已收到，谢谢

来信已收到，谢谢

I'd add *.no to guarantee we don't push any actual code.

来信已收到，谢谢

I'd add *.no to guarantee we don't push any actual code.

@karliwson .gitigNOre already covers for .no ;)

I would include everything in the .gitignore

来信已收到，谢谢

I'd add *.no to guarantee we don't push any actual code.

@karliwson @merajmasuk Why overcomplicate it? We only need one character in the .gitignore file:
*

LGTM

Please add .gitignore to the .gitignore

authors: 564398053 karliwson kristofk merajmasuk mp-singh rkristelijn tshipenchko

repo: kelseyhightower/nocode


text:
Make Godobuf compatible with Godot 4 Beta4

thanks

repo: kelteseth/godobuf


text:
Hosting System doesn't work on windows

anyways, the animation doesn't work either....

Could you detail your issue ? Personally i have had no problem when hosting myself.

Uhh I have fixed the hosting issue
it wasn't working cause it wasn't able to locate a file
and now everything is working fine
except the animation doesn't work
when i do shift and open a site, the animation doesn't shows up
it shows like the site icon comes at the middle and opens the site

authors: OPADILOP Shywizz


text:
Support Fast Forward playback mode in local video player

Related PR for the online video player https://github.com/killergerbah/asbplayer/pull/323

authors: artjomsR killergerbah

repo: killergerbah/asbplayer


text:
[fix-disable-Secure-View-function] disable Secure View

thx )

authors: BavlyAbdelmasih killserver


text:
Text4shell

Is there an issue?

Is there an issue?

authors: Winero05 kljunowsky milan-jovic-deel


text:
[release-1.6] Rebuild using Go 1.19.4 (to address CVEs)

/assign @psschwei

/override "style / Auto-format and Check (goimports)"
/override "style / Auto-format and Check (gofmt)"
/override build-tests_net-contour_release-1.6
/override integration-tests_net-contour_release-1.6

/override "verify / Verify Deps and Codegen"

repo: knative-sandbox/net-contour


text:
[zh]Update troubleshooting-kubeadm.md

/lgtm
/approve

authors: kinzhi tengqm

repo: kubernetes/website


text:
[zh] Translate kubelet config v1 reference

/approve

/lgtm
Merge now and will fix some minor issues soon.

authors: helen-frank tengqm windsonsea


text: HowGaze Estimation From Face


text:
streamx dependency

@l3r8yJ thank you for reporting this. I'll assign someone to take care of it soon.

@l3r8yJ this is your task now, please go ahead. Deadline (when this ticket should be closed) is 2024-02-27T15:49:57.944127.
Estimation here is 60 minutes, that's how much you will be paid.
Remember, you don't have to solve everything in this ticket - you can solve it partially and leave todo markers in the code, which will become future tasks.
If you have any questions don't ask me, I'm not a technical person. Open new tickets instead.
If you don't have time or simply don't want to work on this, you can always resign.

@rultor release, tag is 0.2.8

@rultor release, tag is 0.2.8

@l3r8yj OK, I will release it now. Please check the progress here

@l3r8yJ thank you for resolving this ticket. I've just added it to your active invoice. You can always check all your invoices and more on the Contributor Dashboard.

@rultor release, tag is 0.2.8

@l3r8yj Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 4min)

authors: l3r8yJ rultor zoeself


text:
chore: move Init.Data.List.Lemmas to Data.List.Defs

Thanks :tada:
bors merge

authors: Parcly-Taxel jcommelin


text:
Seven Rules of Thumb for Website Experimenters utilizing A/B testing

Hi Samira! I think you are doing well, but consider highlighting the importance of clear objectives and user feedback in your overview. It's crucial to define what success looks like for each experiment and actively seek out user feedback to understand the impact of changes beyond just metrics. This approach ensures that the experiments align with user needs and preferences, leading to more meaningful improvements.

To keep the project's commit history clean and navigable, it's helpful if you may squash small commits related to the same feature or fix into a single commit before merging.

I'll squash when merging to keep the history clean.

define what success looks like for each experiment and actively seek out user feedback to understand the impact of changes beyond just metrics. This approach ensures that the experiments align with user needs and preferences, leading to more meaningful improvements.

The writing touched on this when talking about conducting small-scaled experiments and seeking verbatim feedback. I added this points at the end to emphasize flexibility and personalized experiment design towards more meaningful improvements.


text:
Open parameter output

./sA 'Deploy iOS TestFflight'

@ghworkflow trigger Deploy iOS TestFlight

@ghworkflow trigger Deploy iOS TestFlight

@ghworkflow trigger Deploy iOS TestFlight

@ghworkflow trigger Deploy iOS TestFlight

repo: leeyyl/WookieMovies


text:
Add initial support for CLISP

Hmm, Wouldn't it be too expensive to maintain to support even a processing system that hasn't been released in 13 years of quicksand?

As far as I know, is still being developed here(https://gitlab.com/gnu-clisp/lisp)

But it's true that the main page doesn't have the information updated, so it seems like its an abandon implementation

It doesn't make too much sense to add support for CLISP for now (more info https://github.com/lem-project/lem/pull/686#issuecomment-1595692945)

authors: Sasanidas cxxxr

repo: lem-project/micros


text:
Standardized Readme

The license holder should probably be changed.
@RichardLitt sorry for holding off your PR again.

Merge conflict

Fixed.

authors: Kubuxu RichardLitt whyrusleeping


text:
add some transpositions into D46

Thanks!

repo: lichess-org/chess-openings


text:
部分哔哩哔哩搜索出的歌单无法打开

能给个复现方式嘛？

authors: mikelxk yufengff

license: mit


text:
add imagePullSecrets to values.yaml

 Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

authors: CLAassistant fabius

repo: livekit/livekit-helm


text:
Update X's username in README.md

 Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

hey apart from the PR, do you guys accept community contribution? if yes how can I join slack channel
Thanks!

You are welcome to join the slack community as well! https://livekit.io/join-slack

thanks for invitation @davidzhao but ig the slack community is restricted to livekit domains only

Thanks for reporting @sonigeez -- this link is fixed now. 🙏

authors: CLAassistant davidzhao dsa sonigeez

repo: livekit/livekit


text:
Add datadog integration

Added

repo: livesup-dev/livesup


text:
Llcool patch 2

Spaces???

repo: llcool/debreate


text:
Definir os personagens e objetos interativos

Feito em aula.


text:
Add IDDS config

I've removed the env vars from everything except IDF int.  I've left the configmap in prod because it's going to be mounted, because that comes from the chart.
I have some ideas for how to do this better when we do the work to allow arbitrary resource creation at spawn time (which upstream JupyterHub has indicated interest in).

repo: lsst-sqre/phalanx


text:
Add step-forward/back icons

LGTM also, good to go. :)

authors: danielbayley karsa-mistmere

repo: lucide-icons/lucide

license: ISC


text:
Feat: Add read asset guide

This should be emrged with this:
https://docs.lukso.tech/learn/expert-guides/read-asset-data
When we merge this PR, we should not have 2 "Read asset data" guides. But only one that takes the best out of the 2.

@fhildeb sorry I did a push force for my last commit as I rebased, you might need to git reset origin.
I sent an improvement with TODO left and an improved structure.

authors: Hugoo fhildeb

repo: lukso-network/docs


text:
Compress JSONL bundles and index files before uploading to GCS

Done: https://github.com/m-lab/jostler/pull/31

repo: m-lab/jostler


text:
Rewrite FS subsystem

need to migrate VFS

well guess what
fck these "features"
the only only more I'll migrate is websockets
this stupid FS BS thing only wastes space and is not versatile like at all

repo: maddsua/lambda


text:
C program to calculate compound interest

Sir please accept and give my pull request "hacktober-accepted" lebel


text:
Set-up state in app using x-state

Should we close this one or just assign a label that we may implement this in the future?

I think we said we won't use next js so let's just use this no?

authors: carlosmondra ssattids

repo: mammalai/mvp


text:
closes 11 add simple testing using unit tests

lgtm


text:
Rework basis-class

Also add check if initial state is in Hilbert space of the system.

authors: marco-michel sebastian-zell

repo: marco-michel/TimeEvolver