ConvKB obtains better scores than ConvE on both datasets (except MRR on WN18RR and MR on FB15k-237), thus showing the usefulness of taking transitional characteristics into accounts.
on FB15k-237, ConvKB achieves improvements of 0.394 − 0.316 = 0.078 in MRR (which is about 25% relative improvement) and 51.7 − 49.1 = 2.6% in Hits@10, while both ConvKB and ConvE produce similar MR scores.