Since Dutch does not mark objects of the verb morphologically, NL-Turkish speakers have difficulty (e.g., unnecessary addition or omission of case markers) in determining the definiteness of the nominal complements in [N V] constructions (Dogruöz and Backus, 2009).
we expect this feature to differentiate well between NL-Turkish and TR-Turkish [N V] constructions and LVCs with yapmak/etmek as verbal complements.