From this figure, we find that SICTF is able to achieve a 14x speedup on average over KB-LDA 10 .
sICTF is not only able to Ablation MEDLINE stackOverflow A1 A2 Avg A1 A2 Avg sICTF 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.96 0.92 0.94 sICTF (λ rel = 0) 0.60 0.56 0.58 0.83 0.70 0.77 sICTF (λ np = 0) 0.46 0.40 0.43 0.89 0.90 0.90 sICTF (λ rel =0, λ np = 0) 0.46 0.50 0.48 0.84 0.33 0.59 sICTF (λ rel =0, λ np = 0, and no non-negativity constraints ) 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.20 0.14 0.17 Table 6: RsI accuracy comparison of sICTF with its ablated versions when no relation side information is used (λ rel = 0), when no NP side information is used (λnp = 0), when no side information of any kind is used (λ rel = 0, λnp = 0), and when additionally there are no non-negative constraints.