(24) ELIMINATION (twice) Fo(tabe'(sushi')(Ken')), Ty(t), ♢ Fo(Ken'), Ty(e) Fo(tabe'(sushi')), Ty(e→t) Fo(sushi'), Ty(e) Fo(tabe'), Ty(e→(e→t)) The above analysis readily solves our first set of the data on the syntactic flexibility of postposing.
postposing may take place at an embedded level.