Z. did so, too' The upshot is that, even though some causative idioms involve an MIC like (25) and thus an analysis invoking structural disruption can account for the impossibility of idiomatic interpretations in, say, (20)b, causative idioms like (19)a cannot be analyzed as having the MIC in (25), and the contrast found in (19) remains a problem to the anticausativization approach.
we can conclude that the anticausativization approach fails for the same reason as the causativization approach: it makes too strong predictions concerning idiomatic interpretations.