It is a core feature of our methodology that the ordinary rule body of a CG parser is used to choose the contextually most acceptable word from a list of correction suggestions.
the best correction candidates are submitted to morphological analysis on par with the original word form, an the result used as input for the tagging stage 1 of the DanGram parser 2 (Bick 2001), whose about 6,000 rules, with their implicit contextual and semantic knowledge, will hopefully sort out the added ambiguity and single out the correct suggestion 3 .