A two-tailed binomial test suggests that JUDGE 1 and JUDGE 2 both perform better than chance (p = 0.0002, 0.003, respectively), while JUDGE 3 fails to reject the null hypothesis of performing at-chance (p = 0.07).
first, as might be expected, negative emotion terms were more fre-quent, according to LIWC (Pennebaker et al., 2007), in our fake negative reviews than in the fake positive reviews.