However, the relative performance of the neural methods differs substantially between the two settings.
(1) SIF performs better than an unweighted average on artificial data, but on real data we see the opposite trend, (2) combining rankings with Borda appears to help on the artificial data, but not on the real data, (3) ranking by length is surprisingly effective on the real data, and (4) results tend to be lower on the real data than the artificial (even at lower values of p).