While we have chosen Nivre's well-known arceager parser as our baseline, we have shown that these transitions can be added to any stack-based dependency parser, and we are not aware of any specific property of arc-eager that would make them work better in practice on this parser than on others.
the reader should be aware that the purpose of this table is only to provide a broad idea of how our approach performs with respect to a well-known reference point, and not to make a detailed comparison, since the two parsers have not been tuned in homogeneous conditions: on the one hand, we had access to the CoNLL-X test sets which were unavailable System Arabic Danish Nivre et al.