831,341 - 831,360 of 1,193,084 Comments
Waxman wrote: <quoted text>Seems to me I recall the ammo shortage started when Obama was elected and got severely worse after the Democrats called for gun control, so you can stop lying now. Gun Lobby, my ars.I know where you can get ammo cheap, but I'm not saying here as I suspect it's only the Dumb Democrats that can't find it at pre-Obama reelection prices. Ammo is scarce simply because of morons like you that are NRA puppets that lack common sense for responsible gun laws. To normal people including more in your state [with good reason]common sense laws are needed, and we prove that as a society daily. Do you or anyone with an IQ over 50 think that the NRA has your best interest at heart? No one has ever tried to take your gun rights away, only common sense rules and regulations. Over %70 of Americans wanted to ban assault rifles and check backgrounds...Only the NRA is against any regulations...Only the most ignorant in our society could possible be against those laws.
John Galt wrote: George W. Bush speech after capture of Saddam Hussein:The success of yesterday's mission is a tribute to our men and women now serving in Iraq . The operation was based on the superb work of intelligence analysts who found the Dictator's footprints in a vast country. The operation was carried out with skill and precision by a brave fighting force. Our servicemen and women and our coalition allies have faced many dangers in the hunt for members of the fallen regime, and in their effort to bring hope and freedom to the Iraqi people. Their work continues, and so do the risks. Today, on behalf of the nation, I thank the members of our Armed Forces and I congratulate them.Barack Hussein Obama speech, Sunday, May 1, 2011:And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as I continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network. Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by my intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly withmy national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan . And finally, last week, Idetermined that I had enough intelligence to take action, and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice. Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad , Pakistan .Notice the difference. The only "I" Bush said was to personally thank the Troops. And O'bama well he went over to Pakistan himself, evidentally, and single handedly killed Osama. I I I me me me my my my. People who talk that way, they are very unsure, and very insecure.
waxywaxturd wrote: <quoted text>Fabulous! I love how I try and confuse the rest of the forum with my lack of cleverness!!! So tricky! Yes my naughty little sockpuppet self isn't fooling anyone but why should I care? If it makes me feel good I say keep it up!! I am doing a wonderful job today, together, who cares if the forum knows I am the same person? It makes it that much more fun!! I'll keep going, I'm doing great today!! But if it's possible, I'll step it up on the judgits!!!! I am not up to par on that today, I hate to admit. I'll try and work on that little detail. Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
John Galt wrote: <quoted text>Edited by you out of your link:"I believe the President�s policies are destructive and will harm our economy, our nation, and our sense of national self long term. I believe his policies have the effect of turning us into subjects of the government, not citizens in charge of it. Because of his expansion of the social safety net funded through class warfare, Mr. Obama�s policies will cause too many Americans� fortunes to rise and fall with those of the government, unable to chart a course for themselves apart from government." next paragraph....But I do not think the President means to do this maliciously. I do not think he is treasonous. I do not hate him. I am not outraged by it. The President has done what he set out to do. I cannot be outraged by him doing what he set out to do. I am far more outraged by the Republicans not doing what they said they would do. http://www.redstate.com/2013/01/20/the-loyal-... Be happy. The anger is unbecoming of the party of Lincoln and Reagan.And if you must be angry, don�t be angry at a President doing what he set out to do, be angry at a Republican Establishment not doing ... well ... much of anything.
Whatever wrote: <quoted text>An opinion piece.The person also states"I believe the President�s policies are destructive and will harm our economy, our nation, and our sense of national self long term. I believe his policies have the effect of turning us into subjects of the government, not citizens in charge of it. Because of his expansion of the social safety net funded through class warfare, Mr. Obama�s policies will cause too many Americans� fortunes to rise and fall with those of the government, unable to chart a course for themselves apart from government."Maybe the person fails to understand that abuse of power or incompetence-whatever is the cause of the current failures- is also just as destructive. We�re off key and off message. We�ve become professional victims dialed up to 10 on the outrage meter. Who the hell wants to listen to conservatives whining and moaning all the time about the outrage du jour? Seriously? Mitt Romney ran a campaign on just how bad things are, but he was rejected by a majority of Americans who felt like he really did not care about them and really had no plans to improve their lives.Bitching about Benghazi doesn�t do that either. http://www.redstate.com/2013/01/20/the-loyal-... the person is Erick Erickson. the new guy at FOX.
Total comments across all topics: 254,557,055
831,341 - 831,360 of 1,193,084 Comments
Waxman wrote: <quoted text>Seems to me I recall the ammo shortage started when Obama was elected and got severely worse after the Democrats called for gun control, so you can stop lying now. Gun Lobby, my ars.I know where you can get ammo cheap, but I'm not saying here as I suspect it's only the Dumb Democrats that can't find it at pre-Obama reelection prices. Ammo is scarce simply because of morons like you that are NRA puppets that lack common sense for responsible gun laws. To normal people including more in your state [with good reason]common sense laws are needed, and we prove that as a society daily. Do you or anyone with an IQ over 50 think that the NRA has your best interest at heart? No one has ever tried to take your gun rights away, only common sense rules and regulations. Over %70 of Americans wanted to ban assault rifles and check backgrounds...Only the NRA is against any regulations...Only the most ignorant in our society could possible be against those laws.
John Galt wrote: George W. Bush speech after capture of Saddam Hussein:The success of yesterday's mission is a tribute to our men and women now serving in Iraq . The operation was based on the superb work of intelligence analysts who found the Dictator's footprints in a vast country. The operation was carried out with skill and precision by a brave fighting force. Our servicemen and women and our coalition allies have faced many dangers in the hunt for members of the fallen regime, and in their effort to bring hope and freedom to the Iraqi people. Their work continues, and so do the risks. Today, on behalf of the nation, I thank the members of our Armed Forces and I congratulate them.Barack Hussein Obama speech, Sunday, May 1, 2011:And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as I continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network. Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by my intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly withmy national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan . And finally, last week, Idetermined that I had enough intelligence to take action, and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice. Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad , Pakistan .Notice the difference. The only "I" Bush said was to personally thank the Troops. And O'bama well he went over to Pakistan himself, evidentally, and single handedly killed Osama. I I I me me me my my my. People who talk that way, they are very unsure, and very insecure.
waxywaxturd wrote: <quoted text>Fabulous! I love how I try and confuse 
the rest of the forum with my lack of cleverness!!! So tricky! Yes my naughty little sockpuppet self isn't fooling anyone but why should I care? If it makes me feel good I say keep it up!! I am doing a wonderful job today, together, who cares if the forum knows I am the same person? It makes it that much more fun!! I'll keep going, I'm doing great today!! But if it's possible, I'll step it up on the judgits!!!! I am not up to par on that today, I hate to admit. I'll try and work on that little detail. Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
John Galt wrote: <quoted text>Edited by you out of your link:"I believe the President�s policies are destructive and will harm our economy, our nation, and our sense of national self long term. I believe his policies have the effect of turning us into subjects of the government, not citizens in charge of it. Because of his expansion of the social safety net funded through class warfare, Mr. Obama�s policies will cause too many Americans� fortunes to rise and fall with those of the government, unable to chart a course for themselves apart from government." next paragraph....But I do not think the President means to do this maliciously. I do not think he is treasonous. I do not hate him. I am not outraged by it. The President has done what he set out to do. I cannot be outraged by him doing what he set out to do. I am far more outraged by the Republicans not doing what they said they would do. http://www.redstate.com/2013/01/20/the-loyal-... Be happy. The anger is unbecoming of the party of Lincoln and Reagan.And if you must be angry, don�t be angry at a President doing what he set out to do, be angry at a Republican Establishment not doing ... well ... much of anything.
Whatever wrote: <quoted text>An opinion piece.The person also states"I believe the President�s policies are destructive and will harm our economy, our nation, and our sense of national self long term. I believe his policies have the effect of turning us into subjects of the government, not citizens in charge of it. Because of his expansion of the social safety net funded through class warfare, Mr. Obama�s policies will cause too many Americans� fortunes to rise and fall with those of the government, unable to chart a course for themselves apart from government."Maybe the person fails to understand that abuse of power or incompetence-whatever is the cause of the current failures- is also just as destructive. We�re off key and off message. We�ve become professional victims dialed up to 10 on the outrage meter. Who the hell wants to listen to conservatives whining and moaning all the time about the outrage du jour? Seriously? Mitt Romney ran a campaign on just how bad things are, but he was rejected by a majority of Americans who felt like he really did not care about them and really had no plans to improve their lives.Bitching about Benghazi doesn�t do that either. http://www.redstate.com/2013/01/20/the-loyal-... the person is Erick Erickson. the new guy at FOX.
Total comments across all topics: 254,557,055