by greg » Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:43 am
I just found out why 'ATS' banns its members for no reason and with out explanation. They bann the members so they can get a new account, which adds to>
by the|exx » Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:14 pm
Topics that discuss the Galactic confederation of light are removed from the UFO section and put in an off topic form. 9/11 Conspiracy theories about Holographic planes being used are prohibited
Perhaps because those topics are absolute crap.. I dunno... just throwing that one out there man! If it was my site, I would close down those types of threads too. Anyone who perpetuates that stuff isn't right in the head. You won't find sympathy for that dross here either.
Last edited by the|exx on Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
by the|exx » Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:15 pm
Double Post... my bad!
by RICH-ENGLAND » Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:49 am
got to agree with my old friend thelexx here, anyone that believes the holographic planes and glf nonsense has serious problems, now im gonna be honest, i dont give much credit to manyconspiracies etc but i do think there are some glaring problems with the official 9/11 story but thats for another thread, but some of the stuff that the conspiracy nuts concoct about it is a serious insult to those that died and is not helpful in any real quest for truth.
now just to be clear, i wouldn't put much past ats and the unscrupulous people that run it, but i think the removal of such garbage is welcome and they should do far more to "deny ignorance" in that way....
by m0r1arty » Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:49 pm
A member for 12 days Greg eh?
I think you'll find RU is the antithesis of ATS with regards to general quality of membership, reasoned and accountable moderation and administration, research and analysis of 'paranormal' events being detailed and unbiased with a smattering of goofy comedy every now and then to balance out the mix.
Whilst you are welcome to believe in whatever you wish to, if you expect others here to give credit to your notions then a thread which can stand up to scrutiny or invites important questions is in order.
All in all your first post (this thread) is nice, polite and concise in it's direction - just the ideas presented themselves deserve separate threads to whittle them down to their minutia as they aren't casually taken as being true around here.
by the|exx » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:37 pm
.. Always the statesman m0r!
by m0r1arty » Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:48 pm
the|exx wrote: .. Always the statesman m0r!
And yet still post banned from ATS.
I'm thinking that the only people worth listening to are those who are post banned (present company excluded of course!, and the exception to the rule being our OP Greg here )
by RICH-ENGLAND » Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:20 pm
you banned too mor? and why?.
i noticed maybe... maybe not has been re instated, wonder how that came about!.
i did join again under another name but only to get info on the judy/wayne stuff. i cant stand to look at the ufo/alien forum anymore, its beyond ridiculous...
by m0r1arty » Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:56 pm
Only post banned Rich - have been for about 5 months now.
by Why Not? » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:14 pm
RICH-ENGLAND wrote: i noticed maybe... maybe not has been re instated, wonder how that came about!
by RICH-ENGLAND » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:38 pm
Why Not? wrote: Rich.....
ah, apologies steve, i could have sworn i read or was told you had been banned from ats not long after me, i must have misread or misunderstood something somewhere.
Last edited by RICH-ENGLAND on Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
by RICH-ENGLAND » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:41 pm
m0r1arty wrote: Only post banned Rich - have been for about 5 months now.
lol. post banned may as well be a full ban, 5 months is a bit long if its only meant to be temporary!. or are they expecting an apology for something you shouldn't apologise for?.
by Why Not? » Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:08 pm
by greg » Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:10 pm
'Anonymous' is working on the situation as we speak.
by RICH-ENGLAND » Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:18 pm
greg wrote: 'Anonymous' is working on the situation as we speak.
oh oh.... this will not end well. lol
thanks for heads up greg.
by greg » Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:43 am
I just found out why 'ATS' banns its members for no reason and with out explanation. They bann the members so they can get a new account, which adds to>
by the|exx » Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:14 pm
Topics that discuss the Galactic confederation of light are removed from the UFO section and put in an off topic form. 9/11 Conspiracy theories about Holographic planes being used are prohibited
Perhaps because those topics are absolute crap.. I dunno... just throwing that one out there man! If it was my site, I would close down those types of threads too. Anyone who perpetuates that stuff isn't right in the head. You won't find sympathy for that dross here either.
Last edited by the|exx on Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
by the|exx » Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:15 pm
Double Post... my bad!
by RICH-ENGLAND » Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:49 am
got to agree with my old friend thelexx here, anyone that believes the holographic planes and glf nonsense has serious problems, now im gonna be honest, i dont give much credit to manyconspiracies etc but i do think there are some glaring problems with the official 9/11 story but thats for another thread, but some of the stuff that the conspiracy nuts concoct about it is a serious insult to those that died and is not helpful in any real quest for truth.
now just to be clear, i wouldn't put much past ats and the unscrupulous people that run it, but i think the removal of such garbage is welcome and they should do far more to "deny ignorance" in that way....
by m0r1arty » Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:49 pm
A member for 12 days Greg eh?
I think you'll find RU is the antithesis of ATS with regards to general quality of membership, reasoned and accountable moderation and administration, research and analysis of 'paranormal' events being detailed and unbiased with a smattering of goofy comedy every now and then to balance out the mix.
Whilst you are welcome to believe in whatever you wish to, if you expect others here to give credit to your notions then a thread which can stand up to scrutiny or invites importa
nt questions is in order.
All in all your first post (this thread) is nice, polite and concise in it's direction - just the ideas presented themselves deserve separate threads to whittle them down to their minutia as they aren't casually taken as being true around here.
by the|exx » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:37 pm
.. Always the statesman m0r!
by m0r1arty » Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:48 pm
the|exx wrote: .. Always the statesman m0r!
And yet still post banned from ATS.
I'm thinking that the only people worth listening to are those who are post banned (present company excluded of course!, and the exception to the rule being our OP Greg here )
by RICH-ENGLAND » Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:20 pm
you banned too mor? and why?.
i noticed maybe... maybe not has been re instated, wonder how that came about!.
i did join again under another name but only to get info on the judy/wayne stuff. i cant stand to look at the ufo/alien forum anymore, its beyond ridiculous...
by m0r1arty » Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:56 pm
Only post banned Rich - have been for about 5 months now.
by Why Not? » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:14 pm
RICH-ENGLAND wrote: i noticed maybe... maybe not has been re instated, wonder how that came about!
by RICH-ENGLAND » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:38 pm
Why Not? wrote: Rich.....
ah, apologies steve, i could have sworn i read or was told you had been banned from ats not long after me, i must have misread or misunderstood something somewhere.
Last edited by RICH-ENGLAND on Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
by RICH-ENGLAND » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:41 pm
m0r1arty wrote: Only post banned Rich - have been for about 5 months now.
lol. post banned may as well be a full ban, 5 months is a bit long if its only meant to be temporary!. or are they expecting an apology for something you shouldn't apologise for?.
by Why Not? » Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:08 pm
by greg » Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:10 pm
'Anonymous' is working on the situation as we speak.
by RICH-ENGLAND » Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:18 pm
greg wrote: 'Anonymous' is working on the situation as we speak.
oh oh.... this will not end well. lol
thanks for heads up greg.