Ball State to review atheism course - Topix
P_Smith wrote: As I just posted on that site, though it will probably be censored Actually this linky's even better: http://www.thestarpress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art... The DI shove their boots right in it with their rants and dispel any reasonable doubt that they aren't creationists. Always knew Johnny West was good for something. And then there's the added bonus of them destroying the world's supply of irony meters by claiming it's illegal to promote atheism in schools while they simultaneously push for IDCreationism whenever and wherever they can in states all over the country, and have been for decades.
The Dude wrote: <quoted text>Actually this linky's even better: http://www.thestarpress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art... The DI shove their boots right in it with their rants and dispel any reasonable doubt that they aren't creationists. Always knew Johnny West was good for something. And then there's the added bonus of them destroying the world's supply of irony meters by claiming it's illegal to promote atheism in schools while they simultaneously push for IDCreationism whenever and wherever they can in states all over the country, and have been for decades. Never give up on your irony meters dude. Keep lying about the burden of proof you halfwit. No response is necessary,
-Skeptic- wrote: Spoken like a theist.You still don't understand the burden of proof, but its better for your mental illness to think you've one, because the truth is clearly unbearable to you. Projection. -Skeptic- wrote: To spell it out, The Dude believes that its atheist job to disprove god, instead of theists job to prove it. Wrong. I have repeatedly stated very clearly and concisely numerous times over that it's the job of the person making the positive claim to back it up. Hence any theists claiming to have evidence of God I have demanded they present it. Similarly any fundamentalist atheists who have claimed that God has been falsified I have also demanded they provide evidence. In this case it would be you who is unable to back yourself up.The reason is simple - God is a non-falsifiable and therefore not scientific. You have claimed to have performed scientific testing that have falsified this previously non-falsifiable concept. I want to know what those tests are.However since you ARE a moon-landing denier who also denies the existence of lizards (all still on record by the way) I doubt you will get anywhere now the same you haven't the past year or two. -Skeptic- wrote: This is why he is a dishonest asshat who couldn't think his way out of a room even with a neon exit sign above its door. Of the two of us I have not lied. -Skeptic- wrote: He tries to speak for atheists, but just keeps embarassing himself.Especially after his buddy troll Nuggin left with his tail between his legs for being a similar asshat. I couldn't care less about atheism. It's simply not relevant to science. It's important to you because you are a fundamentalist atheist. A rare breed perhaps, but not mythical. Also it's not just Nuggin who has pointed out your continued error, but Sub-D, Chimney, Katydid, Kong, Dogen - these people are not known for their ignorance, and the only ones who think otherwise are fundies. But nobody takes fundies seriously. Which is why no-one should take you seriously.Remember at any time you are allowed to address the actual content of my posts. You haven't for near two years, but there's always a first time...
The Dude wrote: <quoted text>...Wrong. Really? The Dude wrote: <quoted text>I have repeatedly stated very clearly and concisely numerous times over that it's the job of the person making the positive claim to back it up. Hence any theists claiming to have evidence of God I have demanded they present it. Similarly any fundamentalist atheists who have claimed that God has been falsified I have also demanded they provide evidence. In this case it would be you who is unable to back yourself up. Not quite. It seems reasonable to argue that the absense of evidence of pixies is sufficient proof that they are mere superstition and should be seen as such. Saying that anyone claiming pixies don't exist is 'fundamentalist' is disingenuous or simply muddled thinking. The Dude wrote: <quoted text>The reason is simple - God is a non-falsifiable and therefore not scientific. You have claimed to have performed scientific testing that have falsified this previously non-falsifiable concept. I want to know what those tests are.... So Abrahamic gods and all these.... http://www.godchecker.com/ may quite reasonably be regarded as nothing more than superstitions and to regard them as anything more requires scientific evidence.There's no more proof of any god so far defined than of pixies.
-Skeptic- wrote: <quoted text>Hey Edsed, just doing some cleaning - I noticed this piece of sh*t was still lying around...it's called the dude... I know Skeptic, you've been as obnoxious me in the past. Sorry you feel it's best to be so rude and unpleasant as I think it tends to discredit and embarrass us as a group (e.g Brits &/or atheists).
Total comments across all topics: 254,564,425
Ball State to review atheism course - Topix
P_Smith wrote: As I just posted on that site, though it will probably be censored Actually this linky's even better: http://www.thestarpress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art... The DI shove their boots right in it with their rants and dispel any reasonable doubt that they aren't creationists. Always knew Johnny West was good for something. And then there's the added bonus of them destroying the world's supply of irony meters by claiming it's illegal to promote atheism in schools while they simultaneously push for IDCreationism whenever and wherever they can in states all over the country, and have been for decades.
The Dude wrote: <quoted text>Actually this linky's even better: http://www.thestarpress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art... The DI shove their boots right in it with their rants and dispel any reasonable doubt that they aren't creationists. Always knew Johnny West was good for something. And then there's the added bonus of them destroying the world's supply of irony meters by claiming it's illegal to promote atheism in schools while they simultaneously push for IDCreationism whenever and wherever they can in states all over the country, and have been for decades. Never give up on your irony meters dude. Keep lying about the burden of proof you halfwit. No response is necessary,
-Skeptic- wrote: Spoken like a theist.You still don't understand the burden of proof, but its better for your mental illness to think you've one, because the truth is clearly unbearable to you. Projection. -Skeptic- wrote: To spell it out, The Dude believes that its atheist job to disprove god, instead of theists job to prove it. Wrong. I have repeatedly stated very clearly and concisely numerous times over that it's the job of the person making the positive claim to back it up. Hence any theists claiming to have evidence of God I have demanded they present it. Similarly any fundamentalist atheists who have claimed that God has been falsified I have also demanded they provide evidence. In this case it would be you who is unable to back yourself up.The reason is simple - God is a non-falsifiable and therefore not scientific. You have claimed to have performed scientific testing that have falsified this previously non-falsifiable concept. I want to know what those tests are.However since you ARE a moon-landing denier who also denies the existence of lizards (all still on record by the way) I doubt you will get anywhere now the same you haven't the past year or two. -Skeptic- wrote: This is why he is a dishonest asshat who couldn't thi
nk his way out of a room even with a neon exit sign above its door. Of the two of us I have not lied. -Skeptic- wrote: He tries to speak for atheists, but just keeps embarassing himself.Especially after his buddy troll Nuggin left with his tail between his legs for being a similar asshat. I couldn't care less about atheism. It's simply not relevant to science. It's important to you because you are a fundamentalist atheist. A rare breed perhaps, but not mythical. Also it's not just Nuggin who has pointed out your continued error, but Sub-D, Chimney, Katydid, Kong, Dogen - these people are not known for their ignorance, and the only ones who think otherwise are fundies. But nobody takes fundies seriously. Which is why no-one should take you seriously.Remember at any time you are allowed to address the actual content of my posts. You haven't for near two years, but there's always a first time...
The Dude wrote: <quoted text>...Wrong. Really? The Dude wrote: <quoted text>I have repeatedly stated very clearly and concisely numerous times over that it's the job of the person making the positive claim to back it up. Hence any theists claiming to have evidence of God I have demanded they present it. Similarly any fundamentalist atheists who have claimed that God has been falsified I have also demanded they provide evidence. In this case it would be you who is unable to back yourself up. Not quite. It seems reasonable to argue that the absense of evidence of pixies is sufficient proof that they are mere superstition and should be seen as such. Saying that anyone claiming pixies don't exist is 'fundamentalist' is disingenuous or simply muddled thinking. The Dude wrote: <quoted text>The reason is simple - God is a non-falsifiable and therefore not scientific. You have claimed to have performed scientific testing that have falsified this previously non-falsifiable concept. I want to know what those tests are.... So Abrahamic gods and all these.... http://www.godchecker.com/ may quite reasonably be regarded as nothing more than superstitions and to regard them as anything more requires scientific evidence.There's no more proof of any god so far defined than of pixies.
-Skeptic- wrote: <quoted text>Hey Edsed, just doing some cleaning - I noticed this piece of sh*t was still lying around...it's called the dude... I know Skeptic, you've been as obnoxious me in the past. Sorry you feel it's best to be so rude and unpleasant as I think it tends to discredit and embarrass us as a group (e.g Brits &/or atheists).
Total comments across all topics: 254,564,425