Jan 8 - U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) Shot at Political Event in Tucson, AZ - Page 11
white people + depression/isolation + twisted philosophy = a lot of people dead
idiots + news story = stupid race comment.
pop pop pop pop pop thats the way it iss
political correctness + news story = overly-sensitive comment
white people tend to shoot up schools, grocery stores, and their jobs (after getting fired) while black people will shoot you on the spot for your chain or wearing the wrong colors....
psychotic, calculating whites vs. impulsive/aggressive blacks
I've seen a study on this...
I'm black and I support this message
MSNBC is leans left but it's not comparable to Fox's position for the right. There are three major libs on MSNBC Ed Schultz, Olbermann, and Rachel Maddow. Joe Scarborough a republican former congressman also has a 3 hr. morning show that usually leans right. The midday stuff is pretty unbiased. Fox News almost never gives a fair depiction of the left center or far left. I think almost all their hosts are conservative. It's their choice though I just think it's stupid they call themselves fair and balanced.
Not to be an a.ss but I'd really like to see an essay on this. Sounds interesting.
heres an interestin article with a look at the shooters past
Mistrust of government was Over time, Loughner became increasingly introspective — what one of the friends described as a “nihilistic rut.”
An ardent atheist, he began to characterize people as sheep whose free will was being sapped by the government and the monotony of modern life.Loughner’s defining conviction, the friends said. He believed the U.S. government was behind the Sept. 11 attacks, and worried that governments were manoeuvring to create a unified monetary system (“a New World Order currency” one friend said) so that social elites and bureaucrats could control the rest of the world.
sounds like a typical member of boxden and most other forums
what the hell is reverse racism screw, foreal? What's the default then?
White people as a whole, are being promoted by some as the problem for not just this incident, but all historical tragedies as a whole.
When whites stereotype all of a race for the actions of some, is that not prejudice and/or racist?
Then why is it suddenly different when we do it to whites?
It's self-righteous, hypocritical bulls**t, and ignorant to the specifics of the situation.
01-10-2011, 05:45 AM #208
Prolly was Michael Moore or The N
yea, i live in tucson...
He looks like your average white dude.
That's what they all look like. Crazy as f**k.
what i said would happen on the first page did happen left vs right blame game. And the blame game all started with the new york times. I guess there little game don't stop even in times tragedy. But as any of us can see this guy acted along he had no agenda but to go after this lady because literacy rates were low in her district. Oh yeah one more thing the democrats had the same map of bulls eye on republican districts in the 2004 election.
White people run the world. Minorities have little to no power, as evidenced by the conditions a lot of us live in.
In America minorities are outnumbered by white people (in the important positions) - specifically white men.
A white person calling a black person a lazy ****** is stereotyping and trying to keep that person (and their race) subjugated, because they stand to benefit.
Minorities (i.e. Blacks) calling white people out aren't racist, they're just prejudiced (understandably so - that's what 400+ years of hearing and being treated like "you ain't s**t" will do to a group).
Being prejudiced doesn't mean you can't be ignorant though....
Anyway, we supposedly live in a world of "colorblind racism" - a world of racists where no one is a racist. Ha, wrap your mind around that...
Last edited by Vdot88; 01-11-2011 at 02:15 AM..
White people of specific bloodlines run the world.
The powers of privilege and a.ssociation rule over black/white any day of the week.
The last 400 years should be a vivid example of how free we truly are today, compared to the past.
But rather than have a moment of clarity based on that fact, we still harp on about the past as a SCAPEGOAT for things not going how we want them to go.
Not to mention, we don't know the first thing about how hard things were 400 years ago, and that we need to stop laying claim to events we have not personally experienced in our own lives.
We have more opportunity now that ever in history, and we need to use it or we will lose it......only difference is, this time, those of other races will lose it as well.
We're all in this together, whether we realize it or not.
So are you saying it was far from hard and rather easy. Therefore it should be forgiven?
Yeah, except white people (males AND females) benefit more than anyone else. I wonder why that is? Are white people just better from the jump? You're right though, white privilege runs the world.
Free in degrees, perhaps. You telling me because black people (and other minorities) are free to live like they please without the scourge of institutional racism, which is somehow better than the centuries of de jure racism?
Pointing to slavery and racism as an avenue of analysis for the present is not scapegoating. That stuff really happened, it happens today, and it has affected and still affects generations of people. But I bet you'd enjoy it if black people just shut up about it and pretended it didn't happen, huh?
Yeah, we do. There are historical documents: first hand accounts, pictures, oral history, etc. You want to deny history - or just the history that doesn't favor a certain (powerful) group?
Yes, white people are just gonna voluntarily give up white privilege...umm, no.
Theoretically you're right. Reality is far from the truth though.
Jan 8 - U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) Shot at Political Event in Tucson, AZ - Page 11
white people + depression/isolation + twisted philosophy = a lot of people dead
idiots + news story = stupid race comment.
pop pop pop pop pop thats the way it iss
political correctness + news story = overly-sensitive comment
white people tend to shoot up schools, grocery stores, and their jobs (after getting fired) while black people will shoot you on the spot for your chain or wearing the wrong colors....
psychotic, calculating whites vs. impulsive/aggressive blacks
I've seen a study on this...
I'm black and I support this message
MSNBC is leans left but it's not comparable to Fox's position for the right. There are three major libs on MSNBC Ed Schultz, Olbermann, and Rachel Maddow. Joe Scarborough a republican former congressman also has a 3 hr. morning show that usually leans right. The midday stuff is pretty unbiased. Fox News almost never gives a fair depiction of the left center or far left. I think almost all their hosts are conservative. It's their choice though I just think it's stupid they call themselves fair and balanced.
Not to be an a.ss but I'd really like to see an essay on this. Sounds interesting.
heres an interestin article with a look at the shooters past
Mistrust of government was Over time, Loughner became increasingly introspective — what one of the friends described as a “nihilistic rut.”
An ardent atheist, he began to characterize people as sheep whose free will was being sapped by the government and the monotony of modern life.Loughner’s defining conviction, the friends said. He believed the U.S. government was behind the Sept. 11 attacks, and worried that governments were manoeuvring to create a unified monetary system (“a New World Order currency” one friend said) so that social elites and bureaucrats could control the rest of the world.
sounds like a typical member of boxden and most other forums
what the hell is reverse racism screw, foreal? What's the default then?
White people as a whole, are being promoted by some as the problem for not just this incident, but all historical tragedies as a whole.
When whites stereotype all of a race for the actions of some, is that not prejudice and/or racist?
Then why is it suddenly different when we do it to whites?
It's self-righteous, hypocritical bulls**t, and ignorant to the specifics of the situation.
01-10-2011, 05:45 AM #208
Prolly was Michael Moore or The N
yea, i live in tucson...
He looks like your average white dude.
That's what they all look like. Crazy as f**k.
what i said would happen on the first page did happen left vs right blame game. And the blame game all started with the new york times. I guess there little game don't stop even in times tragedy. But as any of us can see this guy acted along he had no agenda but to go after this lady because literacy rates were low in her distri
ct. Oh yeah one more thing the democrats had the same map of bulls eye on republican districts in the 2004 election.
White people run the world. Minorities have little to no power, as evidenced by the conditions a lot of us live in.
In America minorities are outnumbered by white people (in the important positions) - specifically white men.
A white person calling a black person a lazy ****** is stereotyping and trying to keep that person (and their race) subjugated, because they stand to benefit.
Minorities (i.e. Blacks) calling white people out aren't racist, they're just prejudiced (understandably so - that's what 400+ years of hearing and being treated like "you ain't s**t" will do to a group).
Being prejudiced doesn't mean you can't be ignorant though....
Anyway, we supposedly live in a world of "colorblind racism" - a world of racists where no one is a racist. Ha, wrap your mind around that...
Last edited by Vdot88; 01-11-2011 at 02:15 AM..
White people of specific bloodlines run the world.
The powers of privilege and a.ssociation rule over black/white any day of the week.
The last 400 years should be a vivid example of how free we truly are today, compared to the past.
But rather than have a moment of clarity based on that fact, we still harp on about the past as a SCAPEGOAT for things not going how we want them to go.
Not to mention, we don't know the first thing about how hard things were 400 years ago, and that we need to stop laying claim to events we have not personally experienced in our own lives.
We have more opportunity now that ever in history, and we need to use it or we will lose it......only difference is, this time, those of other races will lose it as well.
We're all in this together, whether we realize it or not.
So are you saying it was far from hard and rather easy. Therefore it should be forgiven?
Yeah, except white people (males AND females) benefit more than anyone else. I wonder why that is? Are white people just better from the jump? You're right though, white privilege runs the world.
Free in degrees, perhaps. You telling me because black people (and other minorities) are free to live like they please without the scourge of institutional racism, which is somehow better than the centuries of de jure racism?
Pointing to slavery and racism as an avenue of analysis for the present is not scapegoating. That stuff really happened, it happens today, and it has affected and still affects generations of people. But I bet you'd enjoy it if black people just shut up about it and pretended it didn't happen, huh?
Yeah, we do. There are historical documents: first hand accounts, pictures, oral history, etc. You want to deny history - or just the history that doesn't favor a certain (powerful) group?
Yes, white people are just gonna voluntarily give up white privilege...umm, no.
Theoretically you're right. Reality is far from the truth though.